Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by chayden13
Raw

chayden13

Member Seen 7 yrs ago

Here's my nation app


Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Vilageidiotx
Raw
Avatar of Vilageidiotx

Vilageidiotx Jacobin of All Trades

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by chayden13>

I'd like to point out that the usage of muskets makes little sense. Unless everyone forgot that rifling helps with accuracy, then nobody is going to produce a musket over a rifle unless they are in a situation where they don't have access to precision tools. If we have water mills or literally any other reliable way to harness kinetic energy and haven't lost all engineering knowledge from 1860 onwards, then it can be assumed that rifling machines are going to exist in some capacity. This is a practice that technically dates back to the 15th century (although nobody found it particularly useful in the 15th century).

I'd like to bring up the topic of naval vessels for a second here. It's been pointed out that there isn't any diesel or oil coming in for farm equipment, and when we factor in a lack of any large industry then that implies that shipbuilding has been knocked back to at very least the American Civil War. Unless some major steel-working industries remain then ironclads aren't even going to exist. If steam engines are in use (as I've seen multiple people mention as a possibility) then wooden steamers could be the new fleet mainstays. Depending on how much we're willing to accept, older ships could be refurbished to use steam propulsion. If we go that route, of course, any wooden ship would become all but useless in naval combat.

Honestly, this could be an extremely interesting setting. Definitely watching this one.


The only situation I would see muskets coming into use is when you have some place so deprived they have to rely on homemade guns made with basic tools. You might be able to imagine a place so cut off or remote that an unskilled population builds guns based on only a basic knowledge of how they work.

As for ironclads, steel production isn't particularly complex. It's one of those techs that required the discovery, but once discovered would require a disappearance of the knowledge to reproduce, and a lot of the advances in steel production were metalurgical and therefore reproducible up to a point with basic tools. There will be costs due to the lack of industrialized production, but those too would be shifted by the presence of so much scrap steel. I suppose the real question would be about need: what use is a large navy in a world where overseas trade is so limited? Even ironclads were pretty shit at bombarding simple forts.

If you are building a navy for pirate hunting, then wood will work. Pirates, after all, will have limited access to naval equipment and hunting them won't necessarily justify the cost of an iron fleet. For pirate hunting an iron fleet might be a worse idea, since it would cost quite a bit more fuel and would be slower than a wooden ship.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Dinh AaronMk
Raw
OP
Avatar of Dinh AaronMk

Dinh AaronMk my beloved (french coded)

Member Seen 7 days ago

<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>

The only situation I would see muskets coming into use is when you have some place so deprived they have to rely on homemade guns made with basic tools. You might be able to imagine a place so cut off or remote that an unskilled population builds guns based on only a basic knowledge of how they work.

As for ironclads, steel production isn't particularly complex. It's one of those techs that required the discovery, but once discovered would require a disappearance of the knowledge to reproduce, and a lot of the advances in steel production were metalurgical and therefore reproducible up to a point with basic tools. There will be costs due to the lack of industrialized production, but those too would be shifted by the presence of so much scrap steel. I suppose the real question would be about need: what use is a large navy in a world where overseas trade is so limited? Even ironclads were pretty shit at bombarding simple forts.

If you are building a navy for pirate hunting, then wood will work. Pirates, after all, will have limited access to naval equipment and hunting them won't necessarily justify the cost of an iron fleet. For pirate hunting an iron fleet might be a worse idea, since it would cost quite a bit more fuel and would be slower than a wooden ship.


Not to mention the power demand behind retrofitting a container ship to work like a paddle ship or any steam ship of the day.

For example, the Great Western - the first steam ship to make a trans-Atlantic voyage - weighed 1,300-1,700 tons. By comparison a commercial cargo hauler weighs in excess 90,000-100,000 tons empty. So if we're talking retro-modding existing and modern haulers like we use today then the people doing the work will need to consider they're going to need to put an immense and excessive steam engine inside of it, and that would be in itself a very hard task.

Not to mention the efficiency, unless it's linking up with coal stations along the way it's not going to make Europe in one trip.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Dinh AaronMk
Raw
OP
Avatar of Dinh AaronMk

Dinh AaronMk my beloved (french coded)

Member Seen 7 days ago

↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet