I don't think it's too unexpected that people would leave, @Gowi, when the GM has rapid-fire communication when it comes to snapping back at people bowing out, but when it comes to writing xir own post, moderating the roleplay (by accepting character sheets, updating the thread) or even letting accepted players know that they can post while the opener was still a work in progress, it's dead radio silence.

But you didn't answer my follow up question - what's the purpose in bitching out people announcing that the roleplay's lack of communication is killing it, and prospective interest? It's not on the players to force a GM or moderator to show interest in a project they created. To do so, it requires two-way communication. Otherwise, how would we know?

I try not to make a habit of leaving projects without saying anything, but honestly this is the first time I've ever seen a GM go on the defensive for players giving a modicum of respect to them, even when the roleplay appears silent on both the OOC and IC fronts––before it's even started, at that. It seems like this is the first time where flaking and never posting again would be preferable; nobody would have even noticed I was gone!

I appreciate the response, Jacobite I do. I prefer it to people speaking for someone else.

I admit there was some flow of information that was lost to me, but once I was corrected or informed of it I got around to it rather quickly—or as quickly as happenstance allowed me to.

What is the purpose in bitching out people? I want to vent, which is this threads purpose. It’s really that simple. Sure, I expected some public response and if I didn’t want that I would’ve vented privately.

Anyway, to me there is a difference between someone dropping out respectfully and politely criticizing the GM whilst doing so, at least it is in my view. In the last decade plus of working on collaborative projects I’ve seen a lot of ways for players to leave threads and by my definition this wasn’t done in the nature of a respectful departure. You can disagree, as we all have different perspectives and experiences, of course. Anyway, I went on the defensive because people were criticizing my dedication over presumptions instead of actually talking to me about their concerns—over a post that only took me two or three days to actually complete from when I initially posted a working in progress post to get the momentum going and signal others (as has been done in countless comic book sandbox games, by the way) to get to it.

Instead I got people leaving in the course of a few days for what I personally find insubstantial reasoning.

Ah... I just realised I got hooked by vague-booking. Now I feel like a teenager.

I wasn’t vaguebooking, or at least that’s not my intention. I didn’t even know what that term meant. I just had to look it up. Anyway. a lot of comments in this thread dating back to its inception is about writing posts that open conversation about things they find frustrating, vexing, or tiresome in relation to RPing; thus people reply and create a conversation about it.

It's a bit unfair to say that people are fickle because they decided to leave when they had their own reasons and communciated.

That’s a fair point, but is it fair to state the GM has lost dedication or questioning their activity in a passive tone? Things aren’t fair and fairness is based on how we perceive it. Seems to be a case of the shoe being on the other foot and people not knowing how to take it. I could be absolutely wrong, of course, which is why I am responding to you honestly and directly with no intent of offense.

A decent GM wouldn't immediately dismiss other people's concerns as 'insubstantial reasoning', especially if multiple people left for a similar reason.

A good GM doesn’t necessarily view every problem as a problem worth introspecting about. Challenging your actions is all fine and good, but only when it is needed. I personally believe in the framing of “a vocal minority doesn’t necessitate change”; also if any issues were constructive or communicated to me via PM I may have acted differently.

Had anyone had the inquisitive notion to ask me about things, I definitely would’ve explained what was going on and my plans to do such. Especially considering I viewed all three of them as excellent writers and collaborative partners who could provide interesting perspectives that I was looking forward to reading.

@Gowi

Fair enough.

I think what's important to remember is that a little politeness goes a long way - especially as a GM. It can be tough being in the moderator position and being the bad guy all the time, receiving repetitive questions and so on. Most of us have been there.

But here's some homework for you––something to contemplate. Are your posts in the OOC of your own roleplays as polite as they could be?

I believe most of them are direct and lack hostility, yes. The only time I essentially responded a little “irked” was in 1968. I’ve been pretty easygoing in most of my other projects (Saisei, Polaris, Maximum Comics, Avalon Academy, etc.) with the exception where a situation occurred in Pariah Online that didn’t need to which furthermore escalated privately. Honestly, I would’ve preferred if you and the others could’ve communicated with me and we resolved all our issues but I find that with preceding events unlikely.

It is what it is, I suppose.

It sure is nice to weed out fickle players.

I say this knowing this will get a degree of salt, since this is an open forum, but it is really interesting seeing how the cards fall.

Is it really weeding out fickle players when they announce their leave because the GM has been neglecting a roleplay?

Follow-up question: is this the right thing to do when someone voices their reasons for bowing out to you for future reference?

Everyone has seen it, players in an RP that don't contribute to the improvement, the quality, or the enjoyment. These are people that are probably best to have move on and leave, but as a GM you don't always have the backing reason to say "leave us" without coming across as a tyrant or an asshole.

Keeping that in mind and let's say that there's a slight change and that person is the first to complain and then announces that they are leaving. Did it really need to be announced in such a way or would a PM be in order? Is that person creating a drama based scene because they want attention?

When it comes down to this site the people here are hobby writers. Every... last... one... So the idea of treating this like a hobby is that people will participate in their free time and be helpful. We don't need spiteful or negative people and if they are weeded out, then that's fine by me.

As a GM and someone who's been on the receiving end of callous posts, I believe that while it's important to be direct, it's also just as important to be polite. Like @Jacobite says, a little kindness goes a long way especially as a person in authority. 'Lacking hostility' doesn't mean polite, just as being 'brutally honest' is more brutal than honest. Because you made that distinction however, I think you already know your answer.

I don’t go out of my way to condescend, antagonize, or be glib, if that’s what you mean? I’ve been managing role-playing threads for a very long time, so believe me when I say I’ve made mistakes and have learned from them. I try to be respectful and reasonable. I do believe myself as polite. Outside of one or two missteps, I would probably say outside of venting here the worst I did in the RP in question regarding communicating with other players is not taking the initiative of PMing them and working out their issues like I normally do.

You guys are doing it wrong, being polite.

You're supposed to fistfight your players and teach them to stop being little shits.

God, don't you just hate it when GM's aren't acting mature?

Nah, I'm kidding, I don't do that vague bullshit.

@Gowi

This response is just me defending my... reputation, would be the best word for it I guess? I wouldn't even say I have much of one, but hey ho, when people insult me, I like to defend myself. "Weeding out fickle roleplayers." I mean, first of all, your wording. Weeding indicates you put at least some work into it, and it was the lack of said work that I - and others - decided to leave your roleplay. Could I have been more respectful in my leaving announcement? Sure thing, I definitely could have been nicer, or more vague over my reasons: shame on me, I suppose. Your absence from the OOC was something I could understand, and it didn't bother me that much; but delays on accepting sheets, delays on telling people that they needed to give you a writing sample before even being considered accepted, and then posting a WIP opening post and getting annoyed at us when we don't post after it? The GM traditionally kicks off a roleplay with an opener, an introduction. To put up a WIP and then complain at us when we didn't assume the IC is live - without any kind of announcement - is just... well, poor planning, I guess.

I've pretty much just repeated what others have said here, so I'll leave it there. I'm not a fickle writer (Can't say much for the other guys as I don't know them that well, honestly); rude, I'll accept, because my leaving announcement, as I've said, could have been more respectful. But not fickle. I went from being interested in a roleplay, to seeing not great GMing from the GM, to losing faith in it. It happens, and your actions (or lack of) are part of the reason why, whether you like it or not. And as I said in my post, I wish the best of luck to you and the players! The roleplay was an interesting idea, and it would be nice to see it not die. I just wasn't interested in hanging around as a player and getting involved in said potential stagnation.

Nah, I'm kidding, I don't do that vague bullshit.

But you just did.

This response is just me defending my... reputation

As is your right, I would expect you to defend yourself. But moving on to your actual point to state my thoughts and perspective; starting with the weeding and other matters. Consider the fact, from my perspective at the time, a few things:

• While I had to be reminded about the longstanding Gambit applications, as my determinations had been lost in transit following my stay at the hospital, I did respond within twenty four hours of re-deliberating. It was there I asked for a sample post from remaining parties to be sent to my directly via PM. I never got those samples, but my point of view was you and Hellis would get them to me when the timing suited you, which would be fine. For someone who was getting their bearings back together I thought this was very punctual of me.

• Yes, I was blunt (some may define it as crass or inflammatory) in this particular thread when I decided to vent, but in the thread I feel I was as courteous as I could be despite feeling irked about people presuming my dedication to my own project was wavering. In a long-standing project you may have had a point with, but in something that was just getting off the ground not so much.

• As for weeding taking work, all I had to do was post a status about moving over to a new account (which after discussing with others, doesn’t really effect my other roleplays) for you to rescind and withdraw. The others, from my perspective, just left because they couldn’t wait one week which only told me that they weren’t really receptive of the pace of the RP.

• Also, I was only annoyed when people left prior to taking initiative. Which brings me to this—I’ve written in the superhero sandbox games onsite for a little over four years and I am used to people knowing that they can post at any given point in time once it begins. My mistake was not clarifying this since a lot of this RP was comprised of a newer group as presumptions are never valid grounds of excuse.

See, I don’t mind people bowing out; but like I said when things are thrown back onto me in what seems like a surprising notion, I act accordingly. I defend myself with rational and logical counterpoints so that remaining players can see I’m active and responding to an issue with some clarity. I need to show that confidence as a GM, I owe it not only to myself but aforementioned players.

It happens, and your actions (or lack of) are part of the reason why, whether you like it or not. And as I said in my post, I wish the best of luck to you and the players! The roleplay was an interesting idea, and it would be nice to see it not die. I just wasn't interested in hanging around as a player and getting involved in said potential stagnation.

I just find it odd when you say you were/are interested in the idea and hope it succeeds only to say you don’t want to help it stagnate when you could do the exact opposite as a contributing writer. Regular posts are what prevent stagnation, and leaving as you did only seems counterproductive to that point.

But you just did.

I just find it odd when you say you were/are interested in the idea and hope it succeeds only to say you don’t want to help it stagnate when you could do the exact opposite as a contributing writer. Regular posts are what prevent stagnation, and leaving as you did only seems counterproductive to that point.

No amount of regular posts will keep a roleplay alive without an effective leader. I've seen it happen plenty of times before (Not with yourself, a different GM) where they've started a roleplay, and it's stagnated because they didn't put the required effort in. Hell, even I've done that before with some of my earlier roleplays, I'll admit that. As I already said, I left because I didn't want to get stuck in the stagnation and attempted resuscitation of it, because I've been sick and tired of doing so in the past. I invite you to prove me wrong - keep the roleplay alive for a few months, and I'll happily eat my words. But really, the main responsibility of keeping the roleplay directed properly belongs to the GM(s), not the roleplayers. When I say direction, I don't necessarily mean of the plot – I mean of the roleplay as a whole, IC and OOC. When a GM leaves their roleplayers floundering for something to do, waiting for the IC to appear finished - without letting them know they can post for whatever reason - it's a failing on their part, even in a sandbox roleplay. In my opinion, you weren't directing and leading to a standard I like in my roleplays. I say again, feel free to prove me wrong in that - time will tell, and it'll prove one of us right.

without letting them know they can post for whatever reason

You have a fair enough point, I should’ve tacked on a sentence. But again I’d like to mention I had gotten used to the superhero sandbox community onsite that tends to participate in my games (as they have since 2012); people who don’t necessarily need the green light because it persists as a sort of unspoken rule. I should have recognized, as a veteran role-player, that with a largely newer group I should adjust my expectations and be more clear where before I didn’t need to be. That is my failing and I take full ownership of that fact.

In my opinion, you weren't directing and leading to a standard I like in my roleplays.

In my opinion, you weren’t giving me chance to. We both failed on communicating upon issues and expectations, either one of us could’ve took the initiative to PM one another and get things sorted. Instead we snarked at each other which is hardly ever productive.

On that note, I’d like to publicly apologize for demeaning yourself (and by extension Jacobite and Sodomite) publicly. Even if I was frustrated I should’ve communicated better than venting like an adolescent, but everyone is human and makes ill judgements at times. I have led a lot of RPs before, with mixed success rates, and this is one of the cases where I seem to be doubting myself after the fact. At least we communicated like adults as a byproduct of frustrations than what this thread generally turns into.

@MiddleEarthRoze @Gowi

Now kiss.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

>mfw a gm is so shit he won't let me have a full grown leg jut out of the ass of my character as a safety precaution for when she falls



0/10 would never rp with this fgt again

>mfw a gm is so shit she won't let me have a full grown leg jut out of the ass of my character as a safety precaution for when she falls



0/10 would never rp with this fgt again

too afraid to @ me huh

you wanna tussle, fag

@Grimhildr

I did you one better, I fucking linked it to you loser

@Grimhildr

I did you one better, I fucking linked you it loser

ye cause ur a pussy

@Grimhildr

fite me

you'll have a third leg in your ass

@Grimhildr

fite me

you'll have a third leg in your ass

pedo