Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by The Nexerus
Raw
Avatar of The Nexerus

The Nexerus Sui generis

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

Kadaeux said
If a country is "reliant" on sweat shop labour to develop economically, it doesn't deserve to and should be allowed to rot.


What, like the United Kingdom, United States and every other western country?

Industrialization brings about poor conditions for workers compared to the conditions we're experiencing now, but it's an increase from the kind of lifestyle you're living as a subsistence farmer. Working conditions and pay gradually increase. That's what happened in the West, and that's what's already happening in countries like Taiwan. By boycotting sweat shop labour we're preventing the countries reliant on it from phasing out of it.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

The Nexerus said
What, like the United Kingdom, United States and every other western country?Industrialization brings about poor conditions for workers compared to the conditions we're experiencing now, but it's an increase from the kind of lifestyle you're living as a subsistence farmer. Working conditions and pay gradually increase. That's what happened in the West, and that's what's already happening in countries like Taiwan. By boycotting sweat shop labour we're preventing the countries reliant on it from phasing out of it.


((agreeing)) reference (no, I didn't just google it, I took three years of asian economics in college, but you can't exactly hotlink that, so settle).

Generally -- people want better jobs than a factory line. But those jobs don't exist until the economy has developed, and development can't skip steps efficiently. Nobody's lining up to import a Zimbabwe Life Insurance Plan. When you interfere with the natural growth process (like if you applied US labor-union policies to Pakistani textile factories), the immediate result is you just ruin everything, and the long-term is that savvy, rational people do business elsewhere due directly to your policies -- which forever stifles that nation's economic growth.

(edit: clarifying)
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by The Nexerus
Raw
Avatar of The Nexerus

The Nexerus Sui generis

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

Another advantage of the free market.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Kadaeux
Raw

Kadaeux

Member Offline since relaunch

The Nexerus said
What, like the United Kingdom, United States and every other western country?Industrialization brings about poor conditions for workers compared to the conditions we're experiencing now, but it's an increase from the kind of lifestyle you're living as a subsistence farmer. Working conditions and pay gradually increase. That's what happened in the West, and that's what's already happening in countries like Taiwan. By boycotting sweat shop labour we're preventing the countries reliant on it from phasing out of it.


Hold on while I look for how much I care, because for the life of me I can't seem to find any.. :p
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

Kadaeux said
Hold on while I look for how much I care, because for the life of me I can't seem to find any.. :p


Honestly I just want cheaper, cooler shit. It so happens that my rational self-interest is mutually beneficial to the impoverished country I'm buying from.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Vortex
Raw
Avatar of Vortex

Vortex

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

Perhaps it would be so bad if the building they worked in were safe, the machines they use safe, they had workers rights and had a decent minimum wage. But no that will never happen as corporation seem to run the Government these days
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

Vortex said
Perhaps it would be so bad if the building they worked in were safe, the machines they use safe, they had workers rights and had a decent minimum wage. But no that will never happen as corporation seem to run the Government these days


If they ran the government, they wouldn't be doing business in Thailand.

Corporations (like every other entity) are governed by rational self-interest. In other words, they do what makes sense -- that means getting the most for the least expense possible (which is something everyone should aspire to, as I'm sure the environmentalists in the thread would agree). Governments are self-interested as well, both here (which is why they allow free trade and/or pass tariffs in a way that best accommodates their revenue) and abroad (which is why foreign governments allow corporations to invest in building infrastructure and bringing expertise into their country in exchange for lower labor costs). It's easy for us to think 'Well I would never want to work in those conditions!' But remember, even back when Foxconn (the iPhone manufacturer) had all those worker-suicide publicity problems, the line to work in that exact factory was around the block.

Also bear in mind that half of what you hear is information warfare. When American car manufacturers were on the verge of bankruptcy, suddenly we got non-stop reports about Toyota cars malfunctioning (later reports would suggest that the 'malfunction' was actually driver error -- pushing the gas instead of the brakes, and reporting it as a 'possible stuck accelerator'). All that to say.... it's generally wise to spend less time worrying about what you think other people should be wanting, and worry about improving your own life as ethically as possible.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Brovo
Raw

Brovo

Member Offline since relaunch

Note: I didn't go and read through the whole thread because I figured it was the typical back and forth of left and right wingers saying why they believe X and not Y... But there was one quote in particular I -had- to respond to, because it bothered the shit out of me.

Jannah said
But we can't overlook the fact that capitalism continues to kill people every day. It's not a one-way street. We can't pretend like Marxism is some evil demon here.


Capitalism doesn't kill people. Greedy people kill people, and greedy people will always exist. It's the reason Lenin's vision of the USSR failed. It's the reason why Mao's ideology resulted in the deaths of millions. Communism and socialism are idealistic but don't account for human nature.

In the end game of communism, (which is both a political and economic theory with both parts inseparable from one another), you don't have a government, so enforcing laws and the like would be up to cowboy diplomacy: Which isn't fair, it isn't just, and it isn't morally correct. Not to mention the host of other issues with communism, such as the fact that every attempt to produce it thus far have failed, usually to the extreme detriment of the people living in the country. Cuba is arguable the only example of a country that benefited from attempting communism, and even they aren't actually communist: They have a dictatorship government, which communism discards after a while.

In the end game of socialism, the government has a choke hold on the economy and decides what should and shouldn't be produced, and what the populace should and shouldn't get. It's fairer to say that the USSR was a despotic one-party socialism than it was ever a communist state because it never passed the dictatorship stage of the communist theory. Socialism is more realistic than communism: There's a government to maintain universal police forces, health care, firefighters, teachers, and so on. However, socialism is crippled by the fact that we have a finite amount of resources to give, and that a few people at the top can quickly corrupt the system without proper checks and balances, which are themselves prone to spreading corruption.

Then, of course, there's the problem that no matter how many checks and balances are put in, someone will find a way to jerryrig the system to benefit themselves, ergo the continual expansion of more checks and balances, or replacement checks and balances. As the old saying goes: "The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy." --Oscar Wilde

Now, that's not to say capitalism is perfect. It's not. No system is perfect. Just like how democracy is far from the perfect political system... However, capitalism does two things that no other system does.

#1: When the people en masse "vote" with their currency for or against a product (by purchasing or ignoring a product), the company, entity, or otherwise that produces that product is forced to innovate or change to meet the demands of the people.

This is the main reason multi-billion (some even multi-trillion) dollar industries seemingly change all the time. Take gaming: People really hated the direction triple AAA titles were going, so the indie scene exploded, flash games became a legitimate medium through facebook and the like, phone games burst out onto the scene, retro gaming found a market, and so on. Fashion, something I'm less familiar with, tends to change all the time: Fashion trends that were acceptable in 2005 will look tacky in 2015, and so on and so forth. These are industries that could easily order your assassination if they wanted to, they're that bloody powerful, but they're forced to change because people didn't like what they were providing after a while and thus had to change.

Not all industries behave like this, admittedly, some are harder to change than others, but again, no system is perfect.

#2: Empowers people to make their own decisions. So long as there is at least some level of protection for smaller corporations from bigger ones, anyone can start ye olde coffee shop, or become a mechanic, a writer, an artist, a police officer, firefighter, soldier, pilot, and so on. Education for some of these are expensive, but that's a different issue to tackle at a different time: Capitalism, at its core, always lets you choose who you want to be.

Now. That being said, I'm still a socialist, I will always be a socialist. It's just who I am... However, I'm not going to pretend that capitalism is this evil entity that kills people and enslaves millions and etc etc etc. Capitalism is an economic system. One day, when resources are nigh infinite, and automation can take over for humans in the majority of mundane tasks, that will be the day socialism will likely take its place, because then a socialistic government no longer has to concern itself with whether or not there will be enough bread to feed everyone, or enough doctors to heal the sick.

tl;dr: So seriously. Capitalism doesn't kill people. Greedy people kill people.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Jannah
Raw
Avatar of Jannah

Jannah

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Brovo said
tl;dr: So seriously. Capitalism doesn't kill people. Greedy people kill people.


Capitalism creates the poverty that continues to kill millions. Also, the fact that corporations overlook safety regulations in their sweat shops ends up with people killed. That's all I'm going to say on this subject though since I know most of this site is never going to agree anyway.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Brovo
Raw

Brovo

Member Offline since relaunch

Jannah said
Capitalism creates the poverty that continues to kill millions. Also, the fact that corporations overlook safety regulations in their sweat shops ends up with people killed. That's all I'm going to say on this subject though since I know most of this site is never going to agree anyway.


#1: Capitalism doesn't create poverty. Human nature does. Long before there was capitalism, there was poverty. There was poverty in the USSR, there is poverty in China and Cuba, there is poverty no matter which side of the spectrum you are on. With finite resources comes the inevitable: Some will have more, some will have less.

#2: Corporations =/= Capitalism. Two people can exchange goods using currency, that's capitalism. Corporatism may be what you're targeting here.

As for sweat shops, ask Ukraine all about that. I'm sure they have more than a few stories about what the USSR did to them, and the USSR was extremely left wing.

Like it or not, greedy people kill people... Whether that's in the USSR, in a communist state, in the USA, or in a capitalist state. That will never change.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Dervish
Raw
Avatar of Dervish

Dervish Let's get volatile

Member Seen 18 days ago

Kadaeux said
Hold on while I look for how much I care, because for the life of me I can't seem to find any.. :p


Chances are, a lot of what you personally own was created in those exact conditions. Food for thought.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Jannah
Raw
Avatar of Jannah

Jannah

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Brovo said
Capitalism doesn't create poverty. Human nature does. Long before there was capitalism, there was poverty. There was poverty in the USSR, there is poverty in China and Cuba, there is poverty no matter which side of the spectrum you are on. With finite resources comes the inevitable: Some will have more, some will have less. Corporations =/= Capitalism. Two people can exchange goods using currency, that's capitalism. Corporatism may be what you're targeting here.As for sweat shops, ask Ukraine all about that. I'm sure they have more than a few stories about what the USSR did to them, and the USSR was extremely left wing.Like it or not, greedy people kill people... Whether that's in the USSR, in a communist state, in the USA, or in a capitalist state. That will never change.


"Human nature" is a social construct, but that's a discussion that is entirely irrelevant to the OP. So back to the OP, which I am yet to actually comment on... Yes, corporations should be held responsible for their pollution. Many don't seem to realize it, but if we continue at this rate we will only have about a few decades before Earth is no longer able to sustain life. I'm more and more convinced that humanity itself will bring about its own extinction.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Dervish
Raw
Avatar of Dervish

Dervish Let's get volatile

Member Seen 18 days ago

Jannah said
"Human nature" is a social construct, but that's a discussion that is entirely irrelevant to the OP. So back to the OP, which I am yet to actually comment on... Yes, corporations should be held responsible for their pollution. Many don't seem to realize it, but if we continue at this rate we will only have about a few decades before Earth is no longer able to sustain life. I'm more and more convinced that humanity itself will bring about its own extinction.


More than a few decades, but weather patterns are getting worse. It's a combination of human activity and Earth's natural cycles that are causing it. Try as we might, anything short of completely nuking the planet entirely won't be a world-ending event. While it's possible we could kill off humanity, Earth will survive. It's been through worse extinction events than runaway pollution.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Jannah
Raw
Avatar of Jannah

Jannah

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Dervish said
More than a few decades, but weather patterns are getting worse. It's a combination of human activity and Earth's natural cycles that are causing it. Try as we might, anything short of completely nuking the planet entirely won't be a world-ending event. While it's possible we could kill off humanity, Earth will survive. It's been through worse extinction events than runaway pollution.


Well even if earth itself survives humans won't, which is the point I'm trying to get at. Environmentalism is actually a more important issue than many people think.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by The Nexerus
Raw
Avatar of The Nexerus

The Nexerus Sui generis

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

Jannah said if we continue at this rate we will only have about a few decades before Earth is no longer able to sustain life


Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Jannah
Raw
Avatar of Jannah

Jannah

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

The Nexerus said



Oh, you're one of those people.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by The Nexerus
Raw
Avatar of The Nexerus

The Nexerus Sui generis

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

Jannah said
Oh, you're one of people.


What specifically do you believe is going to exterminate humanity within "a few decades"?
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Dervish
Raw
Avatar of Dervish

Dervish Let's get volatile

Member Seen 18 days ago

Jannah said
Well even if earth itself survives humans won't, which is the point I'm trying to get at. Environmentalism is actually a more important issue than many people think.


Environmental health is an issue I'm very much well-versed on. I'm an environmental technology major. My current career is a reflection of that.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by mdk
Raw

mdk 3/4

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

Dervish said
More than a few decades, but weather patterns are getting worse.


Leftist-darling Warren Buffet recently got excommunicated for saying that's just a ploy to sell hurricane insurance.
Hidden 11 yrs ago Post by Vortex
Raw
Avatar of Vortex

Vortex

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

And is is why we need to spend more money on science to help find cleaner more renewable energy
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet