Alright, Drag is writing his post.
LeeRoy said
Name any magic spell and I can come up with a piece of technology that would equal the same power without the added physical exhaustion.
Green said
Technology is in no way inferior to magic, nor vica versa. They both have their pro´s and cons. Technology can be prepped just as much as magic can, and in most cases come out superior in that field, as it often becomes the item itself charging, and not the wielder (allowing the wielder to do other moves unhindered), of course, this can be done with magical artifacts as well.Vordak has a great point on the weight issue.
GreivousKhan said
You guys of course are talking about sci-fi theoretical technology.
GreivousKhan said
So you agree you have to make up some sci-fi tech in order to compensate.
Schradinger said
Just to be clear, Khan, you're not arguing that magic is better than tech because most high-end tech doesn't exist in the real world, are you?
GreivousKhan said
It basically means T1 benefits powers/high-tech over most modern technology.
Schradinger said
Only if you're using them wrong. Preps aren't everything, and there ARE ways to prep modern tech. Such as pulling out a magazine of armor piercing ammo in one post, reloading the gun in the next, and then opening fire in the third. That's a whole magazine of bullets with two preps behind it.
Schradinger said
Where exactly are preps defined as being exclusive to attacks that can gain more raw power? There would be no point to preps if they relied solely on the inherent power of each attack, since that would mean that any attack that delivers more damage than an equally (or higher) prepped defense could absorb would automatically break through the defense. Going back to the armor piercing ammo example, this would mean that an AP round with zero preps could blow through a stone barrier with two preps behind it because stone isn't going to stop a depleted uranium bullet.
LeeRoy said
Oi, Khan. TheBiddz is at work, don't jump to conclusions.Also: Keezi just fucking vanished.
Schradinger said
Where exactly are preps defined as being exclusive to attacks that can gain more raw power? There would be no point to preps if they relied solely on the inherent power of each attack, since that would mean that any attack that delivers more damage than an equally (or higher) prepped defense could absorb would automatically break through the defense. Going back to the armor piercing ammo example, this would mean that an AP round with zero preps could blow through a stone barrier with two preps behind it because stone isn't going to stop a depleted uranium bullet.
ImportantNobody said
I like fights that use that logic. You can't prep a tissue paper for 2 turns and expect it to block a no prep bullet.
GreivousKhan said
.....How in the world is that going to make the armor piercing rounds more powerful? Why should they not have had the same destructive force without the benefit of this special reloading. I think one has to remember preps are only really needed for very powerful special abilities, you don't need a special ritual to shoot a gun, you just do. Hence the benefit of guns and such in the first place.Edit: So with Keezheekoni and seemingly now Kholodny gone, I could probably just say they were captured and hence ho the Empire will learn about the omnicron.
GreivousKhan said
That's basically what I have been saying. You can't expect to fondle a bullet for a post or more and expect it to defeat a more logical prepped defense.