Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Green
Raw

Green

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

GreivousKhan said
Does remind me I need to get a great sword later for one of my characters.


You and me both.

Can't help but love over-sized weaponry.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by GreivousKhan
Raw
Avatar of GreivousKhan

GreivousKhan Deus Vult

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

Green said
You and me both. Can't help but love over-sized weaponry.


Wait for a current character or for a new one. I don't remember any of your PC's being sword users.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Rifle rounds are not sharp. They mushroom and blunt themselves quickly.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Tantalum
Raw

Tantalum

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Oversized weapons are truly great. I'd easily take a giant hammer/mace over a sword although. Gonna be sure to test one out if I ever bother writing another character for this.

GreivousKhan said
Giant swords for the win. You see, the main reason I thought it was big for him is the fact it is called a claymore....Why make such a massive handle/guard if you only use it one handed?
A counterweight would still be desirable there, I figure..? Unless the sword in question didn't have that either.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by GreivousKhan
Raw
Avatar of GreivousKhan

GreivousKhan Deus Vult

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

It's of funny to think that last Omniverses banned guns, and when they did allow them they could not pierce the skin. XD
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MelonHead
Raw
Avatar of MelonHead

MelonHead The Fighting Fruit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

GreivousKhan said
It's of funny to think that last Omniverses banned guns, and when they did allow them they could not pierce the skin. XD


Hmm, that's because it was a more fantasy orientated Omniverse, I prefer it personally. Swords and sorcery is a lot more interesting than 'I pull the trigger of my Uzi lolololol.'

Frankly, it seems like people interested in those sorts of weapons are only interested in winning, but each to their own.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MelonHead
Raw
Avatar of MelonHead

MelonHead The Fighting Fruit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Also Khan, there's a certain wizard you're neglecting.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by GreivousKhan
Raw
Avatar of GreivousKhan

GreivousKhan Deus Vult

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

MelonHead said
Hmm, that's because it was a more fantasy orientated Omniverse, I prefer it personally. Swords and sorcery is a lot more interesting than 'I pull the trigger of my Uzi lolololol.'Frankly, it seems like people interested in those sorts of weapons are only interested in winning, but each to their own.


Says the first person to enter with a gun.

Albeit a weird kind of gun.

(I did also come to the gun=possible winner conclusion though from what I have seen, ppl who like melee weapons tend to like overly flashy interactive combat, I.E Rule of Cool)
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by ASTA
Raw
Avatar of ASTA

ASTA

Member Seen 3 mos ago

MelonHead said
Hmm, that's because it was a more fantasy orientated Omniverse, I prefer it personally. Swords and sorcery is a lot more interesting than 'I pull the trigger of my Uzi lolololol.


I'd rather read about a US or German soldier caught in the Battle of the Bulge than about some wizard mowing her way through a horde of Tolkien-style mook orks. In order to fully take in the story potential behind firearms, you need to write more about what the user is feeling while under fire or when they're the one doing the shooting. Appropriate portrayals of modern warfare can be just as engaging, if not more so, than your run-of-the-mill fantasy story.

The weapons or the world aren't what make something interesting to read; it's about how it's written.
Frankly, it seems like people interested in those sorts of weapons are only interested in winning, but each to their own.


I see this more with people who don't use firearms, honestly.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Frankly, it seems like people interested in those sorts of weapons are only interested in winning, but each to their own.


It's not like the strongest characters in the NS dump aren't magic or anything.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by bushidoxisamu2
Raw

bushidoxisamu2 Underdog Shido

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Did I miss the tourney? :p
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by ASTA
Raw
Avatar of ASTA

ASTA

Member Seen 3 mos ago

So Boerd said
It's not like the strongest characters in the NS dump aren't magic or anything.


That too^
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Schradinger
Raw
Avatar of Schradinger

Schradinger

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

I'm fairly certain Arty's swords, at least when wielded by himself, would stand a decent chance of piercing armor. Monomolecular edge and all that... Plus the 20 tons of strength behind them when he's got his armor on. He's also got guns (with depleted uranium bullets), but thus far hasn't used them because he can't get any more ammo if he runs out.

And speaking of sorcery, if everyone decides not to raise the strength limits I'll probably go with an Asha'man character from the WoT for my first high tier. That or a revamped version of my Noir Cyclops. Thoughts?
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by GreivousKhan
Raw
Avatar of GreivousKhan

GreivousKhan Deus Vult

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

ASTA said
I'd rather read about a US or German soldier caught in the Battle of Bulge than about some wizard mowing her way through a horde of Tolkien-style mook orks. In order to fully take in the story potential behind firearms, you need to write more about what the user is feeling while under fire or when they're the one doing the shooting. Appropriate portrayals of modern warfare can be just as engaging, if not more so, than your run-of-the-mill fantasy story. I see this more with people who don't use firearms, honestly.


If your interested more in gun fights, which I too enjoy, especially the Stony Man series. That's understandable, but to say the story and writing of one is superior to the other cause reasons, is quite silly really. It's easy to make board statements without any truth to it before one eventually start believing their own exaggerated lies.

Cause yo, all Anime is about giant bewbs and never have any good writing ever.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by LeeRoy
Raw
Avatar of LeeRoy

LeeRoy LeeRoy Brightmane

Member Seen 4 days ago

Bushido, this is the Multiverse Arena, and yeah. Y'missed the tournament.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by GreivousKhan
Raw
Avatar of GreivousKhan

GreivousKhan Deus Vult

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

Schradinger said
I'm fairly certain Arty's swords, at least when wielded by himself, would stand a decent chance of piercing armor. Monomolecular edge and all that... Plus the 20 tons of strength behind them when he's got his armor on. He's also got guns (with depleted uranium bullets), but thus far hasn't used them because he can't get any more ammo if he runs out. And speaking of sorcery, if everyone decides not to raise the strength limits I'll probably go with an Asha'man character from the WoT for my first high tier. That or a revamped version of my Noir Cyclops. Thoughts?


I keep reading that as L.A Noire, but i have no idea what this Asha'man character is like, and only vaguely understand that this cyclops is based on the marvel version.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by ASTA
Raw
Avatar of ASTA

ASTA

Member Seen 3 mos ago

GreivousKhan said
If your interested more in gun fights, which I too enjoy, especially the Stony Man series. That's understandable, but to say the story and writing of one is superior to the other cause reasons, is quite silly really. It's easy to make board statements without any truth to it before one eventually start believing their own exaggerated lies. Cause yo, all Anime is about giant bewbs and never have any good writing ever.


Try telling Melon this first.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by bushidoxisamu2
Raw

bushidoxisamu2 Underdog Shido

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Aww poo, I was itching for a fight. I had so many ideas that were wasted >.< should have came back sooner.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by GreivousKhan
Raw
Avatar of GreivousKhan

GreivousKhan Deus Vult

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

bushidoxisamu2 said
Aww poo, I was itching for a fight. I had so many ideas that were wasted >.< should have came back sooner.


And another familiar face I remember.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Green
Raw

Green

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

The only times I've seen someone actually lose to a firearm, was when they got repeatedly caught out of cover and kept charging their foe head on without any attempt at evening the odds.

Just because you bring a knife to a gun fight, doesn't mean you lose.
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet