Well thats one spammer down.

[Jorick]

Raxacoricofallapatorius said
Jorick is pretty level-headed and (usually) a good judge of character. I'd vote for him.(Even though there's always the chance that power would corrupt his heart--if he has one--and we'd all be doomed except for maybe Sherlock)

Nahhh, I wouldn't go mass banning just for shits and giggles. I'd ban the fuck out of anyone that actually stepped over the line, no playing favorites or leniency, but that's not really a bad thing.

Doivid said
Jorick, according to his own words, would be more like an eager Stannis, not really a Joffrey, given modship.I bet I don't even have to explain what that entails. geeks.

Hah, yeah, that's pretty accurate.

[Raxacoricofallapatorius]

Hm, Jorick is too closely tied to the mods and other influential members, tyranny would be (is?) too easy. We should elect someone from outside their circle.

[Beatrix]

Goldmarble said
Nah, not just you, but you are at the top man.You, Nargle, Dervish, Drago, Drakel, Holmes and Toellner.MDK maybe.I'd say Bea, Bela, Kuro and Squee...but they ain't here much anymore anyways.

I've been posting more.

[Drakel]

Doivid said
stannis=lawful good where you get hanged for petty theft (but not really, one guy only got parts of his fingers cut off for being a smuggler). Basically if you step out of line in any small way, you get punished, but he's not unnecessarily abusive.joffrey=chaotic evil, just straight up torture and rape.

I think Jorick would be more on the lines of Lawful Evil... Manipulating the laws behind the scenes to better benefit him and take out anyone he seriously dislikes from the picture (ME!) while still staying within the law...

AKA I think Jorick would be corrupt until everyone he dislikes or would dislike is banned in one way or another... Perma-Bans for little shit without care or mercy for everyone he deams as an "idiot." or just plainly dislikes... But He'd still stay within the law, just... too much and only when it benefits him.

[Raxacoricofallapatorius]

Drakel said
I think Jorick would be more on the lines of Lawful Evil... Manipulating the laws behind the scenes to better benefit him and take out anyone he seriously dislikes from the picture (ME!) while still staying within the law...AKA I think Jorick would be corrupt until everyone he dislikes or would dislike is banned in one way or another... Perma-Bans for little shit without care or mercy for everyone he deams as an "idiot." or just plainly dislikes... But He'd still stay within the law, just... too much and only when it benefits him.

This sounds frighteningly accurate, actually.

[natsumehack]

Drakel said
I think Jorick would be more on the lines of Lawful Evil... Manipulating the laws behind the scenes to better benefit him and take out anyone he seriously dislikes from the picture (ME!) while still staying within the law...AKA I think Jorick would be corrupt until everyone he dislikes or would dislike is banned in one way or another... Perma-Bans for little shit without care or mercy for everyone he deams as an "idiot." or just plainly dislikes... But He'd still stay within the law, just... too much and only when it benefits him.

So in other words he is a evil overlord, and a group of spammers set out to stop him.

But being jorick he is dangerously savvy, and tries his best to use his knowledge of tropes, and cliches to his advantage?

[Jorick]

Y'all nerds clearly don't know shit about me. Even David got it wrong. I wouldn't be Lawful Evil, or Lawful Good (which Stannis is not, btw). I would be Lawful Neutral, just banhammering those who need it without regard for whether it is a good or bad thing. Fuck using it for personal gain, fuck being nice and giving passes, bans for all who deserve them.

[Doivid]

Drakel said
I think Jorick would be more on the lines of Lawful Evil... Manipulating the laws behind the scenes to better benefit him and take out anyone he seriously dislikes from the picture (ME!) while still staying within the law...AKA I think Jorick would be corrupt until everyone he dislikes or would dislike is banned in one way or another... Perma-Bans for little shit without care or mercy for everyone he deams as an "idiot." or just plainly dislikes... But He'd still stay within the law, just... too much and only when it benefits him.

That's plausible but honestly what I know of him, he's a little bitch for technicalities and will adhere to rules when it's practical (WOTM, general behavior outside spam) and I feel like the whole power hungry angle is 'below' him, if you know what I mean. smug little shit.

[Raxacoricofallapatorius]

Sometimes the most just rulers are the most hated.

[Doivid]

Jorick said
Y'all nerds clearly don't know shit about me. Even David got it wrong. I wouldn't be Lawful Evil, or Lawful Good (which Stannis is not, btw). I would be Lawful Neutral, just banhammering those who need it without regard for whether it is a good or bad thing. Fuck using it for personal gain, fuck being nice and giving passes, bans for all who deserve them.

I guess it is more about law than good or bad with him, but show!stannis did let Davos do a lot of stuff as his 'conscience' so he can't be all neutral.

[Jorick]

Doivid said
That's plausible but honestly what I know of him, he's a little bitch for technicalities and will adhere to rules when it's practical (WOTM, general behavior outside spam) and I feel like the whole power hungry angle is 'below' him, if you know what I mean. smug little shit.

Of course it's below me. I don't need to abuse power for all to know my greatness. Only worthless little shits need to throw their weight around to get respect or fear.

Doivid said
I guess it is more about law than good or bad with him, but show!stannis did let Davos do a lot of stuff as his 'conscience' so he can't be all neutral.

He started off Lawful Neutral, but he's been sliding toward Lawful Evil a bit.

[ActRaiserTheReturned]

Raxacoricofallapatorius said
Hm, Jorick is too closely tied to the mods and other influential members, tyranny would be (is?) too easy. We should elect someone from outside their circle.

I'm a good idea.
Everyone ignores me.

[Doivid]

Raxacoricofallapatorius said
Sometimes the most just rulers are the most hated.

lol and I'm just bsing btw, I don't think it should be another skype club member or someone perceived to be in the in-crowd by a lot of people, if there was to be another one.

[natsumehack]

Jorick said
Y'all nerds clearly don't know shit about me. Even David got it wrong. I wouldn't be Lawful Evil, or Lawful Good (which Stannis is not, btw). I would be Lawful Neutral, just banhammering those who need it without regard for whether it is a good or bad thing. Fuck using it for personal gain, fuck being nice and giving passes, bans for all who deserve them.

I image you are a game show host, and you give out bans as a prize.

WOHOOH YOU WON A BAN HERE YOU GO.

HERE A BAN FOR YOU YOUNG LADY!

I GOT BANS FOR ALL, BANS COMMING OUT THE WAZOO!

[Doivid]

ActRaiserTheReturned said
I'm a good idea. Everyone ignores me.

you make bait threads and I've seen some erratic emotional behavior from you, so I can't see it. sorry, no offense meant.

[Raxacoricofallapatorius]

Doivid said
lol and I'm just bsing btw, I don't think it should be another skype club member or someone perceived to be in the in-crowd by a lot of people, if there was to be another one.

The dark horse mod.

[Jorick]

Guys, we should campaign to make Goldmarble a mod. That crotchety old fuck would probably be an amusing rule enforcer.

[Drakel]

Doivid said
That's plausible but honestly what I know of him, he's a little bitch for technicalities and will adhere to rules when it's practical (WOTM, general behavior outside spam) and I feel like the whole power hungry angle is 'below' him, if you know what I mean. smug little shit.

1) LOL
2) Maybe though I prefer him in WOTM and without a banhammer or nametag with the word "MOD" on it... I already stated that I personally think Jorick would be lawful evil more than anything else. Maybe with a tad a lawful neutral when it comes to general shit but still.

[Goldmarble]

Jorick said
Guys, we should campaign to make Goldmarble a mod. That crotchety old fuck would probably be an amusing rule enforcer.

......

The fuck? Hell no.

That would mean I would actually have to look through threads that, just by the fucking title, I ignore on instinct.
I would actually have to read each, and every goddamn one of Nat's posts (Not that they're bad, just so fucking many).
I would actually have to read each, and every goddamn one of Broby's posts (Not that there's that many, just that they're all so stupid and he'll probably need a ban sometime)

Fuck you Jorick, and the horse you rode in on.

[stark]

Goldmarble said
Fuck you Jorick, and the horse you rode in on.

I laughed way harder at this than I should have.