83 Guests viewing this page
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by whizzball1
Raw
Avatar of whizzball1

whizzball1 Spirit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by whizzball1>

By the concept of imaginary numbers, by definition, cannot be achieved in real life. And the problem with quantum theories is that they're nearly pure assumptions, and beliefs in particles that "have to be there" because we have no other explanation, currently, similar to Dark Matter.


What is the concept of imaginary numbers such that they cannot be achieved in real life? They're only called imaginary because of the derogatory term for it. Rather, discard your conception of these numbers being imaginary and work from there to see if they really are imaginary or not. Complex numbers are simply numbers that involve the square root of a negative number--which we get if a particle moves faster than light. There are no mathematical objections to the idea of a particle moving faster than light other than saying that a particle can't have an "imaginary" mass. But there's no way to say that a particle can't have an "imaginary" mass unless you have the preconception that imaginary masses must be imaginary.

Before I put any thought into this, I made sure not to bias myself toward the idea that the concept of imaginary numbers must be imaginary, per their name. Discard that bias and then look at my logic--there is nothing to say we can't have a complex mass unless you say a particle can't move faster than light.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Vampyr
Raw
Avatar of Vampyr

Vampyr

Member Seen 10 yrs ago

I'm back, sorreh for the late post:(
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Etcetera
Raw
Avatar of Etcetera

Etcetera David Dynamo

Member Seen 14 days ago

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

What is the concept of imaginary numbers such that they cannot be achieved in real life? They're only called imaginary because of the derogatory term for it. Rather, discard your conception of these numbers being imaginary and work from there to see if they really are imaginary or not. Complex numbers are simply numbers that involve the square root of a negative number--which we get if a particle moves faster than light. There are no mathematical objections to the idea of a particle moving faster than light other than saying that a particle can't have an "imaginary" mass. But there's no way to say that a particle can't have an "imaginary" mass unless you have the preconception that imaginary masses must be imaginary.

Before I put any thought into this, I made sure not to bias myself toward the idea that the concept of imaginary numbers must be imaginary, per their name. Discard that bias and then look at my logic--there is nothing to say we can't have a complex mass unless you say a particle can't move faster than light.


No, it's called imaginary because no number can be squared to return a negative number; you would be forced to invent an entirely new number system- which someone did. I hold that equations could likely be solved with another formula, using strictly real numbers. Regarding faster than light, there is no reason a particle moving at that speed would somehow change formulas to include imaginary principles, and while there may not be mathematical objections (technically), there are physics objections, due to anything traveling at the speed of light would require infinite energy, or no mass. Because, in this aspect (due to formulas and concept) mathematics and physics are intertwined, there is no way of separating them, causing a concept violating physics to violate mathematical laws, and vice versa.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Etcetera
Raw
Avatar of Etcetera

Etcetera David Dynamo

Member Seen 14 days ago

I'm back, sorreh for the late post:(


It's fine.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Vampyr
Raw
Avatar of Vampyr

Vampyr

Member Seen 10 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by Vampyr>

It's fine.


Ridley will be back, just for future reference.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Vampyr
Raw
Avatar of Vampyr

Vampyr

Member Seen 10 yrs ago

ERIC CLAPTON IS A GOD.

REASON:LAYLA.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 22 hrs ago

Sjin: More than a Clown.

Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by whizzball1
Raw
Avatar of whizzball1

whizzball1 Spirit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by whizzball1>

No, it's called imaginary because no number can be squared to return a negative number; you would be forced to invent an entirely new number system- which someone did. I hold that equations could likely be solved with another formula, using strictly real numbers. Regarding faster than light, there is no reason a particle moving at that speed would somehow change formulas to include imaginary principles, and while there may not be mathematical objections (technically), there are physics objections, due to anything traveling at the speed of light would require infinite energy, or no mass. Because, in this aspect (due to formulas and concept) mathematics and physics are intertwined, there is no way of separating them, causing a concept violating physics to violate mathematical laws, and vice versa.


The entirely new number system exists just as the irrational numbers were entirely new, but they exist as well. We invented the irrationals to square the circle. We invented the complex numbers to take the square root of negative numbers. The real numbers are either positive, negative, or zero. Any negative number multiplied by itself is positive, just as any positive number, and 0 squared is 0. No real number can be squared to arrive at a negative number. Thus, we came up with the complex numbers. But people didn't like that, and they called it imaginary. The imaginary numbers are no more imaginary than the irrational numbers are irrational--that is, not at all.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Etcetera
Raw
Avatar of Etcetera

Etcetera David Dynamo

Member Seen 14 days ago

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

The entirely new number system exists just as the irrational numbers were entirely new, but they exist as well. We invented the irrationals to square the circle. We invented the complex numbers to take the square root of negative numbers. The real numbers are either positive, negative, or zero. Any negative number multiplied by itself is positive, just as any positive number, and 0 squared is 0. No real number can be squared to arrive at a negative number. Thus, we came up with the complex numbers. But people didn't like that, and they called it imaginary. The imaginary numbers are no more imaginary than the irrational numbers are irrational--that is, not at all.


Untrue. Imaginaries don't have a place in real world mechanics, because the real world only deals with real concepts. Imaginaries take a concept that cannot even be done in numbers (without creating a new system), and because of the way that system is constructed, it cannot be achieved.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Araby264
Raw
Avatar of Araby264

Araby264

Member Seen 2 mos ago

ERIC CLAPTON IS A GOD.

REASON:LAYLA.


YES!!
I DID A COVER OF THAT SONG FOR MY GIRLFRIEND BECAUSE HER NAME SOUNDS SIMILAR AND IT WAS EPIC!!!
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by whizzball1
Raw
Avatar of whizzball1

whizzball1 Spirit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by whizzball1>

Shinji:

*looks to Maddie*

We're going to destroy genesis. I need sjin to hack into his program drive and limit his powers, so we can destroy him. Let's just hope he hasn't gotten stronger...


This was to Mister Strange.
Hidden 10 yrs ago 10 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 22 hrs ago


>Be me
>Decide to turn Sjin into a philosopher for a post.
>Liz is the only one who answers.
>herewego.png
>She says exactly what Sjin said, only shorter.
>Uses Sjin's logic to try to debunk Sjin's logic.
>Was only trying to do that for some sort of comedic effect
>mfw I failed miserably
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Etcetera
Raw
Avatar of Etcetera

Etcetera David Dynamo

Member Seen 14 days ago


>Be me
>Decide to turn Sjin into a philosopher for a post.
>Liz is the only one who answers.
>herewego.png
>She says exactly what Sjin said, only shorter.
>Uses Sjin's logic to try to debunk Sjin's logic.
>Was only trying to do that for some sort of comedic effect
>mfw I failed miserably


>Liz's statement is misinterpreted
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 22 hrs ago

<Snipped quote by Galaxy Raider>

>Liz's statement is misinterpreted


Watchu mean? The way I'm reading it, she is saying the same thing as Sjin when he said basically everything's been seen or done.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Etcetera
Raw
Avatar of Etcetera

Etcetera David Dynamo

Member Seen 14 days ago

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

Watchu mean? The way I'm reading it, she is saying the same thing as Sjin when he said basically everything's been seen or done.


She's saying very, very little has been done. It's easy to make new events, because almost every universe is just a copy of another, while few are unique.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 22 hrs ago

<Snipped quote by Galaxy Raider>

She's saying very, very little has been done. It's easy to make new events, because almost every universe is just a copy of another, while few are unique.


I reread it with that explanation in mind and I'm still not getting that out of it.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Extra
Raw
Avatar of Extra

Extra Maki

Member Seen 21 days ago


>Be me
>Decide to turn Sjin into a philosopher for a post.
>Liz is the only one who answers.
>herewego.png
>She says exactly what Sjin said, only shorter.
>Uses Sjin's logic to try to debunk Sjin's logic.
>Was only trying to do that for some sort of comedic effect
>mfw I failed miserably


Avis replied.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Extra
Raw
Avatar of Extra

Extra Maki

Member Seen 21 days ago

Night.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Etcetera
Raw
Avatar of Etcetera

Etcetera David Dynamo

Member Seen 14 days ago

<Snipped quote by Etcetera>

I reread it with that explanation in mind and I'm still not getting that out of it.


Except that's bogus, considering most experiences are extremely similar, and there are only a handful of truly unique paths of circumstance.

Most experiences are similar -> Most universes are copies
Only a handful of truly unique paths -> Most universes are copies

Ergo, it's easy to do something new when not much has been done.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Etcetera
Raw
Avatar of Etcetera

Etcetera David Dynamo

Member Seen 14 days ago

Night.


Night, laters.
↑ Top
83 Guests viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet