And as for the amorality of objects in general, I agree with the principle, but assuming we aren't worried about justice for inanimate objects, everybody across the board generally agrees we should police objects on some level. Like, no matter how right wing anybody is, I doubt you could find many people who would defend an average citizen's right to own a fully armed nuclear bomb. It is an object too, and a completely amoral one, but allowing just anybody to have one is irresponsible. Once we've all agreed that property rights have some reasonable limitations, the goal for all of us is to find what degree of limitation is best for the common good.
Like, no matter how right wing anybody is, I doubt you could find many people who would defend an average citizen's right to own a fully armed nuclear bomb. It is an object too, and a completely amoral one, but allowing just anybody to have one is irresponsible.
defend an average citizen's right to own a fully armed nuclear bomb.
own a fully armed nuclear bomb.
own ... nuclear bomb.
