no fuck you everything about you turns to poops
Sup nerds
<Snipped quote by Doivid>
tfw learn that you lost because your competitor [redacted] if she didn't win
<Snipped quote by Azarthes>
you're right
if i hadn't left rpg for long
maybe... maybe it wouldn't be in the state it is today
it's a weight i have to bear daily
the thought of the rpg that could have been
<Snipped quote by Frizan>
the only one with all the good people
delete aza
What do you think?
I think most people would say no. Maybe claiming that a breach of privacy makes them feel uncomfortable. It would constantly nag at their mind. Plus they simply wouldn't like the idea of not being able to get away with dishonesty.
As odd as it sounds, I think that allowing a person to lie or cheat is an essential part of life. The freedom to do something wrong when someone isn't looking and possibly get away with it has been a part of the human experience since the beginning.
But is it essential? Would we be less "human" without it?
Maybe these changes in the norm are less important than we think. There are many vast differences in culture across the world. Other people live their lives in ways we don't fully understand.
Are one of these ways any better than the others? I mean, one has to be, right?
Is it the one with the most happiness overall? Or are they really equal? You can't measure potential happiness based on hypotheticals, though, can you?
In summary, I wonder if one "framework" of a human life has more value than another.
I wasn't going to say, but I started thinking about this sort of thing while thinking about politics. My idea was about having a government where leaders had to be under constant surveillance in order to prevent corruption.
That led to all sorts of questions about how the specifics would work, this thread being related to one of the questions.
<Snipped quote by Azarthes>
(^: