• Last Seen: 7 yrs ago
  • Joined: 10 yrs ago
  • Posts: 19 (0.01 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. Cantankerous_Arthropod 10 yrs ago

Status

User has no status, yet

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Of course, I was thinking more of human rights violations.
So, individuals may only be represented by organizations, is that correct?
@Aaron: I totally missed the treaty establishing the Third International. May cases be brought before the IPC by individuals, or groups of individuals, in something akin to a class action, as is possible before the European Court of Human Rights, in the case of the state itself violating their rights?
It could be interesting for the IPC to actually be opened to states not members of the International, so as to provide a formal institution for international conflict resolution.

@Vilage: Is the USSA storyline still canon? If it is, we could expect the socialist president to have at least begun addressing the problem of segregation.
Antisemitism would realistically be a major issue in post-czarist Russia, the social turmoil leading to massacres and fearmongering.
As pertains to Spain, it could be possible the increased and prolonged involvement of women in warring Europe in fact accelerated the liberation of women. History could really have gone either way. In any case, it would seem feminism is firmly implanted in Persia, which could be passed off as a consequence of the socialist party's strength and the Shah's modernism. As radical Islam is a much less potent force, the opposition to feminine emancipation would be notably weaker, though far from weak.

I recall some posts concerning the Jewish question in Palestine. What ever happened there?
So Europe is still more or less a crapsack world for Jews, with the US not that far behind.
European women would certainly have played a major role in the war effort, especially with the war itself having lasted so much longer. We could expect feminism to be much stronger in the old continent than in the new, unless the times of unrest would have caused a return to more conservative values.

Do you think anything analogous to the Civil Rights movement or Stonewall could have occurred? I have serious doubts, especially concerning the latter. That and 2nd and 3rd wave feminism are fights of the postmodern world, which is certainly not a stage PoW has reached yet. The only aspect in which PoW might be better than our reality, is religious extremism, which hasn't yet picked off.

I just remembered most of what we call human rights don't have much legal or even conceptual existence here. The distant Hague conventions of 1899 and 1907 are not so present in the minds.



All this is rather problematic though, as Persia has already enacted what now seem ultraprogressive laws, like sanctions against sexual assault, financial independence for women, the depenalization of homosexuality, a minimum wage, and so on. If the debate doesn't exist yet, I could hardly conjure the solutions out of thin air.
Something just dawned upon me: with the timeline divergence, were women enfranchised in the UK and USA, and thereafter throughout the western world, was there are any feminist movement in the 60s, a queer movement akin to the one which followed Stonewall; for that matter, were the Jim Crow laws ever repealed, or is Segregation still very much alive? In the same vein, is antisemitism still as prevalent as in the late XIXth century, with pogroms in Eastern Europe and jewish quotas in the Ivy league?
Always the video.
Victory, I have posted. Posting again is an altogether different matter. I can't believe I already have 5 other storylines in mind. T_T
May 24th, 1980

Esfahan, Persia

Mahmud Hotami, first delegate of the cabinet and chairman of the Socialist Party of Persia[retcon, not the Communist Party anymore or ever], couldn't help but have a bout of incredulity each time he looked outside the glass walls of his office. 30 years in clandestinity followed by 10 in the official opposition had left their mark in his character. At times he would find himself looking suspiciously at his aids, wondering to what extent they could be trusted. This habit wasn't an entirely bad one in politics, especially not in the current times. He was to meet his secretaries of foreign affairs and of defense in a few minutes' time on the issue of the imminent war in Africa. As he stared at the brown, burnt rooftops of the city, he was left to ponder whether the world was on the verge of a new conflagration. The nuance, this time, was that weapons were far deadlier, and the actors even less honorable. There was no doubt that at the first occasion, VX would be used to exterminate the civilians of the other side. It seemed to the first delegate, who would have been grandfather had his children not been 'taken' in their youth by the agents of the ISIIS, a long time ago - when he was presented with the opportunity to learn the truth, he had preferred to leave all that in the past - that human life was worth even less nowadays than in his own youth. Even they who had caused the Great War felt some reluctance to send the youngsters of their nation to death, whereas the leaders of today seemed to play war like a game. And in this game, none was ever sure of his friends and foes. Persia was still considered little more than a colony by the capitalists whose industry it fed, and even after the victory of the forces of progress at home, China did not seem to so much as notice the existence of its brothers and sisters. Hotami held a particular grudge against China, which had time and again rejected his party's plea for help. Perhaps it wasn't such a bad thing, though, seeing how subservient it expected its 'allies' to be. Socialist as he was, he also believed his people deserved respect- all peoples, for that matter, which is why he gravitated towards the SPP in the first point- and would not accept hegemony and imperialism in any form, whether bourgeois or supposedly proletarian.
'The time of lofty idealism is long gone,' did he correct himself, knowing full well that in what was to come isolation would not be an option.

He heard someone knock on the door.

"Agha Hotami, General Ganji and Khanom Kowsar have arrived." announced the secretary.

"Let them in."

The two came in, nobly, with a steely gaze, albeit for opposite reasons. Without a word, Hossan summoned them to his desk. Very matter-of-factly, he asked: "Well, you know the situation. Agha Ganji, what do you have to say?"

"The High Command refuses any intervention against Spain. It is not our war, and even if it were, we would stand no chance." His point was clear, to the very least.

"Khanom Kowsar?"

"As a citizen of Persia, as a proud human being, I say this aggression is unacceptable." Her taunt was obvious. No military man could be attacked on his pride. "Spain has proven, once again, that all it seeks is global domination and the enrichment of its oligarchs. It is an imperialistic power which imperils the stability of the entire world, not to mention freedom and human dignity. It cannot be allowed to pursue its expansion, or it will devour us all. Already it has re-enslaved a third of Africa; soon it will close off the Mediterranean, to no one's benefit but its
own. Spanish rule would mean a return to the dark age."

The general promptly fired back: "Whose dark age would you rather have ? May I remind you just a few years ago Persia was at war with China's minions?"

"Does resistance to Spain mean surrender to anybody else? Who here exactly is supposed to protect Persian territory? Do you mean you..."

Hotami could sense his friend about to make a disastrous comment. It was time to bring back order to the discussion. "Enough!" he commanded. "It is our nation's interests which are at stake here. It is no time to settle your personal misgivings. Pray remind me what is at stake, and what we have to lose or gain. I dare hope it will bring back some sense to you."

Ganji argued: "As far ar the army is concerned, it is a conflict between two states with which we are neither allied nor in conflict. We have no obligation to act."

Leila Kowsar, fiery as always, though slightly more composed than previously: "A foreign power with few interests aligned with ours, and in fact oftentimes conflicting, as concerns oil, Armenia, Africa, is attempting to invade a friendly state with which we have cooperated in Arabia, the Ottoman Empire and Armenia, with which we have ever closer economic ties, and which has been, just as us, a consistent foe of imperialism. Ethiopia fights alongside Persia for respect and control of its destiny."

"Yet we are not Ethiopia." countered the ageing man. "And we are not free to send troops around the globe. We must already maintain order in Azerbaijan and Arabia, not to mention India. We are already overstretched. For all your talks of dignity and respect, you must realize Persia is not as powerful as the West. We are not in measure to directly confront one of the strongest and most advanced armed forces in the world. India was a proxy war, where no one was willing to directly get involved. That is what allowed us to match the ASB."

This show of humility was certainly surprising to Hotami and Kowsar. The premier, bringing back the subject to what he had intended to speak of first and foremost, advanced: "All this talk is good, but perhaps before projecting any sort of action, we must ask what is at stake. What may happen from now? Agha Ganji, for all your reservations, what is the most plausible course of events, at least from a strategic point of view?"

"Ethiopia has proven its capabilities in the past, but never before has it had to face such an opponent as Spain. It has rarely fought a symetrical war; Egypt had been in disarray for decades, its army was underfunded and attacked on two fronts. It is a given Spain will secure the canal. Thereafter the Red Sea will be open to reinforcements. I suppose the goal is Addis Abeba. A pincer movement is probable. That is where Ethiopia might balance the rapport de force. Once in Ethiopian territory, the Spanish army will be vulnerable to guerilla. It remains to be seen, but France and Germany could get involved."

The Secretary of Foreign Affairs voiced her fear of such a scenario. "That would be a disaster. It would mark the second colonization of Africa. The Mashriq, still in the aftermath of the Ottoman Empire's demise, would be the easiest of targets. It would be miraculous if they do not try to stir trouble in Arabia and Iraq. Spanish companies have been regularly attempting to tap into oil fields well on our side of the border. In any case, an ethiopian defeat would mean a radical upsetting of the global balance of power."

"What must I make of this?" said the frustrated Hotami. "One of you tells me military intervention is impossible, and the other that action is indispensable. You are dismissed. I will reconvene the council at a later time."

After their departure, brooding as he gazed outside, a fleeting thought crossed his mind.

"Where are we now?"

I've been thinking this for a few months: doesn't it seem to you that world politics are becoming almost as crazy as PoW? The power play in Ukraine or the proclamation of the Caliphate appear to come right out of our twisted mind. Putin used exactly the same justification as I did when Persia invaded Arabia, c'mon!
The Wall! The Wall! The Wall! Inverted!

This day is exceptional: I have started writing my post. I just have to finish those 4 plotlines I had in mind. *sigh*
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet