Durandal

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

^ Bloody Quebec.

<Snipped quote by MetalLover>

Lovely.

Great Britain now has a population approx. 141,000,000, and includes Australia and New Zealand as constituent countries.

@The Nexerus

Crowding problems.
That's a lot of people in such a small space

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

Is Denmark part of any country?

@Mihndar

The GEC, yes

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

May i get a list of claimed European countries?

@duck55223

France is also unclaimed.

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

No, we are "defending the Marionites in Lebanon."

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

<Snipped quote by Nerevarine>

Hear, hear.

@Iluvatar

I second this motion.

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

Muhahahah... Now we are unstoppable >:)

It's odd how religion is shaping things already - interesting though.

Anyone for a Crusade? :P

@Iluvatar

How about no? The Reich disapproves.

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

I have Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan besides Russia of course. Though with the OP'S permission I would like to request also having the rest of Soviet Central Asia and the Caucasus, considering I am bordered by a nation that controls all of East Asia and the more than two billion people there and you know, a country that is half of Europe.

@Mihndar

I may be half of Europe more or less but not particularly powerful. There are consequences to being a battleground. :P
Although I do have my untested defensive network.

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

<Snipped quote by Durandal>Sure, why not?
20 years is a long time.

@Willy Vereb

Considering the GEC's economic independence initiative, any treaty would likely have been political or military in nature rather than economic. Perhaps a pact of mutual defensive support in which one country aids the other in the case of one of the two being invaded?

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

@Willy Vereb
Do you suppose any form of agreements or treaties would have been made between Neo-Hungaria and the GEC before 2050?

Age of Rebirth (Post WW3)

<Snipped quote by Durandal>Both are apparently allowed.
Solid-state lasers aren't THAT big and decades of development can certainly shrink them down.
We already have laser point defenses thanks to Rheinmetall. They are sure not as OP as portrayed in sci-fi. They are a nice way to compliment your already long list of countermeasures.

As for Railguns...well, they have issues in general.
Power requirements (same as big lasers in the MW range), wear on the rails (IIRC about 30 shots prior to replacement) and issues with the ammunition options.
Actually, I think I may stick with the "conventional" cannons.
The navy is interested in railguns because it'd give them a cheaper alternative to missiles and rocket-assisted projectiles when bombarding from range. The raw velocity of the projectile turns it into an explosive.

@Willy Vereb

I'm familiar with some of these things. Though I think I may stick with conventional cannons as well. I completely forgot about weapons companies in Germany and Italy, though who knows how man of their employees I would even have left. Employees that matter, at least. But then, I in no position for war so whatever.