Avatar of FrankenDaughter
  • Last Seen: 3 yrs ago
  • Joined: 7 yrs ago
  • Posts: 209 (0.08 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. FrankenDaughter 7 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

5 yrs ago
69
2 likes
5 yrs ago
@LetsFly I'm still big gay. Found a poetry circle in my city so cool I might not do RPs for a while.
5 yrs ago
Letty, my mood is all Cacedas and gose. What's your mood?
5 yrs ago
Yikes Crew Stands for LeeRoy, he most in denial.
2 likes
6 yrs ago
@Poo How are mods selected? I don't even know.
1 like

Bio

I have been roleplaying for fifteen years through various formats from at the dinner table to PbP to RTC. I strongly prefer for mechanics to drive narrative in live roleplay sessions, but in PbP and RTC I'm creative enough that I prefer for creativity to drive narrative instead. To that end, you will probably never talk me into the tabletop subforum, and I can't imagine being dragged easily into Arena or Nation roleplays either.

Preferred size: Anything not exceeding 10 players. I've engaged in very chaotic and bloated playercounts for PbP before and am not eager to engage in that level of discord in the near future.
Preferred genres: Anything. I often enjoy having the opportunity to genre clash, a thing you will notice with my practice work in Expanding Horizons.
Preferred roles: I do not have the patience to build and maintain attractive hub posts for roleplays, which to me is a valuable skill... in GMs. I have co-GM'd in the past both officially and unofficially, and would be happy to do so again.
Quality standards: Any, though I do prefer to interact with players that have a firm understanding of english grammar.

Play Status: Seeking group RPs. Solicitations welcome. 1x1s considered on request, not guaranteed.
---Participant in Allaria: Chapter 5 ARP
---Found regularly practicing on Expanding Horizons PWRP

Most Recent Posts

@Mao Mao Probably hours before I was informed that the proposal had gone through. q:

I was holding off celebrating until the changes went live. So, tonight, I get to go drinking and eat something fancy.
We did it.

I want to express a sincere thank you to everyone who added their voice to the proposition that lead to this amendment. A lot of eloquent and thoughtful motherfuckers really came out of the woodwork and helped refine/expand the scope of what needed to be done. Good-good stuff.

Hopefully the next step, holding one another accountable, will reinforce the groundwork accomplished this month.

GGs.
Legitimate question: What attacks have been going on toward marginalized groups on this site? Maybe my social circles here just haven't overlapped with those that have seen it, but I've never come across anyone who's here to terrorize or belittle someone from the groups mentioned above. I've also got some concerns about policing speech on the Guild unless this issue extends beyond one or two jackasses who could be dealt with by alerting the mods about their behavior. Adding rules doesn't stop people from being bigots, after all, and there will probably always be a few skulking around.

As the discussion on the Discord server has become quite in-depth and involved recounting some of the history you're asking about, I'm loath to retread that history here when I am actively managing participation at present. If someone else wants to, I welcome them to do so.

Second question: If this issue is prevalent enough to warrant action, what solutions are being suggested to handle it? I'm interested in hearing the specifics.
[/quote]
The immediate proposal is exactly what it says on the tin. Support for marginalized groups should be included in the rules. It affords both community members as well as staff accountability for themselves and one another.

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))_

Y'know I was about to quote

  • Respect all members. Be pleasant to each other and treat people how you would like to be treated. Remember that respect comes in all forms and should be applied in everything that you do. When disagreements arise in discussion be sure to address them in good faith, ensuring that you avoid escalating them into any unnecessary conflict.


as being an anti-harassment rule but, as it turns out, this one is worded super lax. Still, I think the spirit of a rule called "respect all members" naturally umbrellas into "also respect the members of a more marginalized identity", don't you?

No, because the spirit of that rule's laxity does nothing to expose/speak to implicit bias. On the one hand, members are expected to make the same decisions staffers have to with vague rules on matters they may have little to no understanding of. This occurs every time they might speak out in a channel and every time they feel inclined to PM a staffer. On the other hand, staffers' implicit biases are fit to come on display whenever they decide to take a proactive role in enforcing the rules. This is the precident by which such abuses of power have been carried out, both by members and staffers.

Otherwise I mostly agree with Dagger here; if there's harassment, I haven't seen it. If it's private enough, then I'm sure the members in question should be reported and dealt with accordingly. The mods on this site are pretty open folk; I really doubt it's a systemic problem. I'd also really like not to be stalked on this site; people can report me if my conduct is out of line (though most of my warnings come from the status bar, so I'm basically painting a target on myself, really)

I'm not ruling out the possibility of there being nasties on this site, but I really doubt they're ubiquitous enough to be much of a "root cause" problem.

I'm inclined to believe that the main site is, at present, much less likely to be seething with subtle bigotry than it used to be. But I have not been an active member for some time outside of the Discord. I am still a writer, but I am in between my days of writing for roleplay. What I am not is an absentee. I have seen enough history on guild ti know that it has not always been so tame as it is now.

I am not under the impression that the calling out of individual abusers or bigots is necessary at present--I will state explicitly now that I have no interest in this. But setting more explicit standards by which we can hold one another accountable to will make it less likely we will need to do so in the future.
(This is a mirror post. Another has been posted in the Off-Topic forum, but, as this is likely a time-sensitive manner, I felt it worth the effort to post here as well.)

An open discussion on our Discord is presently being held. For years, RPG's staff and members have had a difficult time enforcing the rules regarding respect for individuals when attacks against such people could be veiled as attacks on specific groups. The examples over the years of this kind of bigotry are myriad. I have taken it upon myself to give voice to our concerns--ones that I think center around the future accountability we deserve to see from site staff as well as an improvement in our community's ability to care for and reassure one another.

Because of the open nature of the discussion, I am asking marginalized peoples throughout the site to come and offer their support for this endeavor. Staff should be made to witness the difficulties that this has caused for POC, queerfolk, disabled persons, and marginalized peoples the world over. RPG is an international community. It should be held to intersectional standards of accountability for the safety of its members. Please come join the discussion.

(Remember you need to be signed in through the Discord link at the top of the bar in order to view our discord server.

The channel in question and the beginning of the discussion:
discordapp.com/channels/3139427885364…

A more coherent restating of the case for changing the language of our rules to support marginalized groups, and a TL;DR for those not willing or able to sift through the first day's talks:
discordapp.com/channels/3139427885364…

I would also encourage anyone who would like to post here to use this as another avenue of discussion. I have no idea how many people don't use our Discord server, but I assume that number is at least a little higher than those that do.
An open discussion on our Discord is presently being held. For years, RPG's staff and members have had a difficult time enforcing the rules regarding respect for individuals when attacks against such people could be veiled as attacks on specific groups. The examples over the years of this kind of bigotry are myriad. I have taken it upon myself to give voice to our concerns--ones that I think center around the future accountability we deserve to see from site staff as well as an improvement in our community's ability to care for and reassure one another.

Because of the open nature of the discussion, I am asking marginalized peoples throughout the site to come and offer their support for this endeavor. Staff should be made to witness the difficulties that this has caused for POC, queerfolk, disabled persons, and marginalized peoples the world over. RPG is an international community. It should be held to intersectional standards of accountability for the safety of its members. Please come join the discussion.

(Remember you need to be signed in through the Discord link at the top of the bar in order to view our discord server.

The channel in question and the beginning of the discussion:
discordapp.com/channels/3139427885364…

A more coherent restating of the case for changing the language of our rules to support marginalized groups, and a TL;DR for those not willing or able to sift through the first day's talks:
discordapp.com/channels/3139427885364…

I would also encourage anyone who would like to post here to use this as another avenue of discussion. I have no idea how many people don't use our Discord server, but I assume that number is at least a little higher than those that do.
Unto inferno, vastaya
In hillo 5 yrs ago Forum: Introduce Yourself
hello
Posting this character in its current state to clear their magical ability with the showrunners herein. Let me know if its within bounds.

Also, should I bring Poet in again? I wouldn't be porting in her old intro--she'n Doorman would be working as a twosome this time around. I could also just work them in as Guilders if there's a disparity to correct for.

Doorman & ???




There can definitely be ambiguity within each faction.

Also, uh, heya. I'm willing to give this another go.
Eternity lies
ahead of us and behind.
Have you drunk your fill?
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet