that is, if you're willing to see only one side of the argument.
i don't see evidence of this, but if you want to think that go ahead.This isn't comic deadpool. THIS Deadpool is desperately embroiled in a game of oneupsmanship and needs every advantage he can get.Actually "4th wall breaking" isn't a thing Deadpool uses beyond the occasional gag. He's certainly never used it to obtain omniscience.And deadpool has that heap load of metagame, now doesn't he? Good lord, how about you stop whining and just watch how the roleplay turns out? Sheesh, i was planning on the try-but-fail scenrio anyhow.It's not jumping to conclusions if you specifically state you want Ghost Rider to come in and attack Ajax right off the bat. And you can't deny that it requires a whole heap of metagame to even find Chaos' body, let alone revive it.jumping to conclusions yet again.well they kind of jumped to a conclusion that obviously wasn't true.What, that you want to murder or otherwise undermine Ajax? Because that's very obviously true. I don't particularly mind, hell the whole Deadpool reviving Chaos stuff could almost be justified by your little spiel about Deadpool leaving no man behind. Almost, since it relies expressly on gross metagaming to recover a corpse he doesn't even know exists, that should've by all rights gone into the magma already, in order to heal a dead, headless person from being dead with a crucible piece. Last I checked death isn't an ailment. Not to mention Chaos' thing was being an unlikeable pest that would readily endanger his own allies, which should collide with Pool's team-survival mindset. So yeah, actually there's a lot wrong with reviving Chaos (I forgot GM actually wanting to do something with the character) beyond like, doing an OOC favor to the player, but whatever, you can almost kind of justify it as something that isn't forming a duo of characters that want Ajax dead. But then you wanted to have Ghost Rider, a literal spirit of vengeance if I may repeat myself, come in entirely with no justification beyond attacking Ajax. That's pretty telling, mate.
Uhh, well shit. You guys do argue a lot. Well I think I might be accepted, maybe? Or am I completely wrong?he looks good to me.
And deadpool has that heap load of metagame, now doesn't he? Good lord, how about you stop whining and just watch how the roleplay turns out? Sheesh, i was planning on the try-but-fail scenrio anyhow.It's not jumping to conclusions if you specifically state you want Ghost Rider to come in and attack Ajax right off the bat. And you can't deny that it requires a whole heap of metagame to even find Chaos' body, let alone revive it.jumping to conclusions yet again.well they kind of jumped to a conclusion that obviously wasn't true.What, that you want to murder or otherwise undermine Ajax? Because that's very obviously true. I don't particularly mind, hell the whole Deadpool reviving Chaos stuff could almost be justified by your little spiel about Deadpool leaving no man behind. Almost, since it relies expressly on gross metagaming to recover a corpse he doesn't even know exists, that should've by all rights gone into the magma already, in order to heal a dead, headless person from being dead with a crucible piece. Last I checked death isn't an ailment. Not to mention Chaos' thing was being an unlikeable pest that would readily endanger his own allies, which should collide with Pool's team-survival mindset. So yeah, actually there's a lot wrong with reviving Chaos (I forgot GM actually wanting to do something with the character) beyond like, doing an OOC favor to the player, but whatever, you can almost kind of justify it as something that isn't forming a duo of characters that want Ajax dead. But then you wanted to have Ghost Rider, a literal spirit of vengeance if I may repeat myself, come in entirely with no justification beyond attacking Ajax. That's pretty telling, mate.
jumping to conclusions yet again.well they kind of jumped to a conclusion that obviously wasn't true.What, that you want to murder or otherwise undermine Ajax? Because that's very obviously true. I don't particularly mind, hell the whole Deadpool reviving Chaos stuff could almost be justified by your little spiel about Deadpool leaving no man behind. Almost, since it relies expressly on gross metagaming to recover a corpse he doesn't even know exists, that should've by all rights gone into the magma already, in order to heal a dead, headless person from being dead with a crucible piece. Last I checked death isn't an ailment. Not to mention Chaos' thing was being an unlikeable pest that would readily endanger his own allies, which should collide with Pool's team-survival mindset. So yeah, actually there's a lot wrong with reviving Chaos (I forgot GM actually wanting to do something with the character) beyond like, doing an OOC favor to the player, but whatever, you can almost kind of justify it as something that isn't forming a duo of characters that want Ajax dead. But then you wanted to have Ghost Rider, a literal spirit of vengeance if I may repeat myself, come in entirely with no justification beyond attacking Ajax. That's pretty telling, mate.
Then the point stands, I don't see any overreaction here, because something like that is a good example of overreacting and nothing of the sort has happened thus far. No, bringing up grievances and discussing things OOC isn't overreacting.well they kind of jumped to a conclusion that obviously wasn't true.
Was it or was it not an overreaction? Pretty sure even you admit that it was.yeah, i do. But i was having bad day at the time, and apologized for my actions the next day.
Y'know, I'm not one to place some kind of intrinsic value on an opinion or train of thought simply because it's held by the majority or even just a group of people, but when like half the active players in a roleplay take issue with you and the rest don't even make a token effort to back you up beyond "arguing is bad gais, plz stop", maybe you're in the wrong here Jon. Having said that, Rokku: I don't see any particular overreaction here. Threatening to drop the RP, saying the site is full of elitist pricks and that you'll call the mods because your feelings are hurt, now that I'd call overreacting. People disagreeing with you doesn't mean you're being picked on and people agreeing with others who disagree with you is not a conspiracy. Jon, however, is most certainly not at fault for arguing to defend himself. I feel he's at fault for other things, such as transparently wanting to undermine my character then using the flimsiest excuses to try and deny it, but arguing his point isn't in itself bad.wow, you're still talking about that? You really don't know what a bad day means, do you?