Kadaeux

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Magic Magnum said
I'm reading this before my placement startsin a few minutes and I still have a page to go before replying in full.But to address two things quickly right now...1. Kadaeux. Lay off on the insults. You're not getting anywhere.2. We did not evolve from todays monkeys. We and modern day monkeys evolved from a common ancestor. Like how many breeds of dogs evolved from wolves.

There are no insults. If you think anywhere in my posts there has been an insult I suggest you get out more, or look at Yog Sothoth's posts which do in fact contain actual insults, generalised ones to boot.

RPG Been Tripping, Or have I been?

Nytem4re said
Lately it seems that double posts happen frequently now, and posts sometime take around 3-7 minutes to actually show up...

Anyone else having these problems or am I just high as a kite and imagining all of this?

You may very well be high as a kite.

But you're not imagining it.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Yog Sothoth said
nice way of showing how much of an asshole you are. you're just proving my point about how atheist like you are ignorant dicks like the religious extremists. you sir are sad and pathetic

*Slowclap*

Nice job dumbass. I'm not an Atheist.

And it's not being an "asshole" to point out that your argument is unintelligible to the point that any so-called "philosophy" you've applied is diluted to the point where it ceased to be philosophy and started to be just a dumb, poorly formatted, poorly thought out opinion.

Yog Sothoth said
being articulate applies more to talking real life, and I don't think be absolutely grammatically correct makes you a better philosopher, just the same as you don't have to be a J.R.R Tolken to be a writer, it is called having your own style.

There is a difference between "not being absolutely grammatically correct" and "molesting the English language with a rusty rake." Of which you are doing the latter consistently.

You don't "have your own style" unless your idea of "style" is to bunch up a lot of words into a rough brick-like shape and bludgeon people in the face with it.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Yog Sothoth said
nice job with showing how much of an asshole you are. like i said, atheists like you are the reason why people get pissed at atheism. keep responding like that and you're just proving my point.

*Slowclap*

Nice job dumbass. I'm not an Atheist.

And it's not being an "asshole" to point out that your argument is unintelligible to the point that any so-called "philosophy" you've applied is diluted to the point where it ceased to be philosophy and started to be just a dumb, poorly formatted, poorly thought out opinion.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Yog Sothoth said
nice job with showing how much of an asshole you are. like i said, atheists like you are the reason why people get pissed at atheism. keep responding like that and you're just proving my point.

*Slowclap*

Nice job dumbass. I'm not an Atheist.

And it's not being an "asshole" to point out that your argument is unintelligible to the point that any so-called "philosophy" you've applied is diluted to the point where it ceased to be philosophy and started to be just a dumb, poorly formatted, poorly thought out opinion.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Yog Sothoth said seriously? you're calling me not a philosopher because of your grammar Nazism? a philosopher is someone who studies philosophy, it doesn't say anywhere about grammar. the insult about my grammar is the sign of using bad tactics to win an argument.

A significant part of philosophy isn't just learning it, it's the ability to understand it and CONVEY it to other people. Your complete lack of ability to do so means that if you ARE a philosopher you should give it up and take a career more suited to your natural talents. Like Janitor. I would have said McDonalds Burger Flipper, but I'm not sure you'd be able to convey the customers orders adequately.

I'm not "using bad tactics to win an argument" I'm pointing out your inability to form a coherent and easily understood sentence means you don't HAVE an argument.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Yog Sothoth said
seriously? you're calling me not a philosopher because of your grammar Nazism? a philosopher is someone who studies philosophy, it doesn't say anywhere about grammar. the insult about my grammar is the sign of using bad tactics to win an argument.

No. A philosopher is someone who studies philosophy and can articulate themselves clearly enough to others. You clearly cannot articulate yourself clearly. You accuse others of conducting personal attacks, and yet you're the first to do so.

I'm not saying you're not a philosopher. I'm saying that if you are, which I doubt, you're so painfully terrible at conveying information that you should give it up, sooner than later.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Yog Sothoth said
I'm calling bullshit on you saying I'm terrible at articulating myself. the Africa and Middle East part theory could happen, you never know. once again I don't share your opinion and you insult me for it. hypocrite much?

You call bullshit? Sure. I present Article 1 of Evidence you're incabable of properly articulating yourself.

Yog Sothoth said
interesting post, but it won't matter, atheism will be gone in about fifty years when the populations shift and Africa and the middle east become the dominant powers. religion has seen worse than most people can imagine and it's still here, so regardless of how much atheists insult or argue, faith and belief come naturally to us, it has been proven. also since when does something always have to be fact to be the right course of action? no one can make an absolute prediction, also science is mostly guess work and not always correct. religion is asking for people to trust in it and have belief in it. we as a species put faith in each other to do the right thing and are never always sure what the outcome of a decision is. my opinion, evolution is still believed because it has yet to be disproved, but for all we know it could be disproved in the next ten years. before you guys jump on me and call me a religious moron like many atheist jerks do, I'm not religious, I'm a philosopher and i laugh at how hypocritical atheists are nowadays by calling people stupid and retarded. it proves how hateful human beings who don't truly understand knowledge are and just use it to feel superior.

We have zero counts of sentences properly beginning with capital letters.
We have multiple counts of large run-on sentences.
We have multiple counts of criminal abuse of a comma.
We have numerous accounts of baseless supposition.

Oh yes. And the PRIMARY piece of said evidence.

A giant block of text that should have been broken up into multiple paragraphs.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

Yog Sothoth said
interesting post, but it won't matter, atheism will be gone in about fifty years when the populations shift and Africa and the middle east become the dominant powers. religion has seen worse than most people can imagine and it's still here, so regardless of how much atheists insult or argue, faith and belief come naturally to us, it has been proven. also since when does something always have to be fact to be the right course of action? no one can make an absolute prediction, also science is mostly guess work and not always correct. religion is asking for people to trust in it and have belief in it. we as a species put faith in each other to do the right thing and are never always sure what the outcome a decision is. my opinion, evolution is still believed because it has yet to be disproved, but for all we know it could be disproved in the next ten years. before you guys jump on me and call me a religious moron like many atheist jerks do, I'm not religious, I'm a philosopher and i laugh at how hypocritical atheists are nowadays by calling people stupid and retarded. it proves how hateful human beings who don't truly understand knowledge are and just use it to feel superior.

Religion and Faith =/= Knowledge.

I mean did you even read what you wrote? If you're a philosopher I suggest you give it up because you're clearly terrible at articulating yourself, let alone even formatted.

Not to mention the ridiculous doomsaying "Africa and Middle East becoming dominant powers" nonsense.

♘Evolution vs. Creationism☼

ActRaiserTheReturned said
Chinese history cannot be damning towards the Creation hypothesis. The Chinese don't exactly like to share their mythology/religions and the entirety of their culture with the rest of the world.

This argument is so weak Steve Urkel could arm-wrestle it into submission.