I'd love to help you guys, but you're so darn far east that I can't even pretend to try.
If I have decided to stay in Central America, then I would be in a weak state. And that would give Mexico and/or Colombia reason to attack and take land.
<Snipped quote by Pepperm1nts>
Also, if you go for a government in St. Petersburg, we can roll with saying it's funded/supported by the Germans as the "true" Russian government. Don't really have the reach if you go for a Moscow-based one though.
@The Spectre
I think that, by the fifties, the British would be well off enough to retaliate in force to any attempt at their Caribbean territories.
<Snipped quote by Shyri>
To make things funner we can toss a third city into the mix, if my knowledge of the source of the Russian nation banter is correct; though this is in a post-Soviet world.
Folk say it's Saint Petersburg, because that's what Czar Peter built and he's the one that officially founded the Russian state. Muscovites claim it's Moscow because Moscow was at the center of the state Peter was born into and ruled from to found Russia, never mind he moved the capital of the Empire to Sankt Petersburg.
Then there's the people of Novgorod, who have the claim to the Rurik dynasty who came on invitation to impose order and whose dynasty moved out from to seize the lands that made the Rus kingdoms. Though this claim may be nationally small, but that's also because the Soviets repressed Rurik's legacy because it was too foreign, Danish/Swedish in fact.
But in any case since the royal family had ties to the Germans and also invited many Germans to live in the Empire itself the precedent for German involvement in the area is already pretty strong either way.
<Snipped quote by Mihndar>
Apart from the name situation, my only concern after was the time lapsed between the czar's death and the break down of order in Russia itself and curious how you came to this.
I'm sure I alluded to the Russian situation as it were beginning sometime during the later side of 1955, so it's up to you guys to find the precise year.
I won't accept anything where the history is changed prior to World War 1.
@Shyri
I haven't forgotten you, I just don't have time. I'll be back in a couple hours to read the app.
<Snipped quote>
East Poland is Polish. *gasps*
Anyways, it makes little sense that a 5 year old government can maintain control over most of their core territories, half of Belarus, and all of Eastern Poland. Especially when the same government doesn't even have full control of the Ukrainian population. In comparison, Poland as a state has existed long enough to actually hold it's cultural territory.
If you really want to get into it.
That said, I had been talking over the details of Germany over the last couple days with Aaron and Vilage. I didn't just look at what you put down, take a paintbrush to it, and scribble over what you have.
Just because the Cossack Hetmans were elective doesn't mean that the title can only ever be that. You'd just be invoking a title associated with Ukraine's Cossack past for the sake of cultural legitimacy, which is something that Monarchs and Dictators love to do. The constitutional details are whatever you want.
<Snipped quote by Mihndar>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_monarchy
May be better to ally yourself closely to the German Empire by electing a member of German nobility as the King rather than some random general.