Avatar of Meth Quokka
  • Last Seen: 2 yrs ago
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1584 (0.40 / day)
  • VMs: 5
  • Username history
    1. Meth Quokka 7 yrs ago
    2. ████████ 11 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

4 yrs ago
Current The world may crack, the sky may fall, but here you will find us amongst it all.
1 like
7 yrs ago
Happy 10th birthday RPG. You've got to enjoy my company for 8 years now, bask in that glory. PS: I do not have an ego
1 like
8 yrs ago
So this is what it is like to be a regular user again. At least I can now browse on my mobile without accidentally hiding posts.
6 likes
8 yrs ago
I would like to thank every member of the guild for their support over my last three years as a mod. I hope I made as good of an impression on the guild as it did on me. Now, please don't ban me :)
24 likes
8 yrs ago
My reaction to seeing spambots: youtube.com/watch?v=ofFH3rDu..
1 like

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

[redacted]


That damn secretive government!
Well this is the end of that conversation.

It’s obvious you two can’t get along so just avoid interacting before this thread has to be closed againz
Chill the fuck out, keep it impersonal,
This thread has always had a tenuous grip to life.

Don't ruin it by bringing up a recently locked thread.
For clarification, you are allowed to disagree on the OP's argument but don't throw personal insults around. Same goes for the other way around, the OP's opinion is not golden or closed to criticism. Criticise the idea, not the person. I am closely monitoring this thread.
I'm cutting this off before it goes anywhere sour. Discussions are fine but circular arguments tending towards flaming is not.
<Snipped quote by Odin>

"nothing to do but flame him"

Because stopping isn't a choice


Commenting after a mod asks for the conversation to cease is not a smart ofea, keep that in mind in the future.
The topic does have an interesting balance in terms of copyright protection in terms of intellectual property; in most cases it must be patented/trademarked depending on the exact nature of it.

End of the day the reuse of images is so rife in our society that it's pointless to argue that writers should never use images made by someone else if they don't explicitly say not to. Look at the comparison for memes, how many of us share and repost memes, yet never reference their original creator?

The underlying issue I see is there is often a misunderstanding from the artists perspective of when these images are used, they're somehow being claimed by the person using them rather them then going oh look, here's an image that perfectly suits the world/character I'm trying to create. That is based off my experience interacting with artists who have joined to complain about the misuse. They can't be surprised at the image being reused as it is in the public domain and often has no watermark or private use statement. I've used other images from google searches like this in the past because they capture that setting/flavour of the idea I may feel I'm not properly portraying in words.

However end of the day, this isn't a in court legal argument, it's more a commonality of respect among artists; we don't claim credit for other people's work and if the original artist has an issue with it, then we remove it.

On the topic of people being reprimanded over the use of plagiarism in contests, that is because there was prewarnings on the contest entries that it had to solely be your own work for the single purpose of the contest. Additionally this was done for the purposes of gain by cheating the system.
@Kangaroo be in my thread like:


I am indeed known for my propensity for a beer.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet