NarcolepticSailor

World in Revolution: 1861

Denmark and Switzerland are available as well. Switzerland is pretty much strictly a diplomatic roll though, don't see any logical reasoning for them tossing aside their neutrality.

World in Revolution: 1861

It'd likely be easier to just continue on with 1900 with MagOne and Ab GMing if they're both up for it.

World in Revolution: 1861

Whatever they want to do, really. Wasn't sure if anyone had intention on picking up 1900.

World in Revolution: 1861

It appears that 1900 may not be continuing as well, which may make MagOne a candidate for assisting in GMing if he ends up wanting to. We all know he's more than capable of taking up the roll of Co-GM.

World in Revolution: 1900

Dutchbag said
Running this game takes up a lot of my time. Time I'm afraid I won't have as the year progresses. Currently, I'm considering stopping this game and do something that requires less of my time. Not only does this work in the interest of my schedule, but it's better than doing it at the last moment when we're invested more in the game, maybe even in the middle of a war. What do you say?

If you don't think you'll be able to have the time to effectively GM this as the year goes on it may be best to just put this aside before the ball really gets rolling.

World in Revolution: 1900

Pepperm1nts said
You ain't gonna do shit by just calling the Tsar a meanie in letters.

Well, it seems something has come out of it so far. Though in the mean time I am wondering where some of our other players are so far since there hasn't been any sign of them. Namely; France, Italy, Turks, and Belgian Waffles.

World in Revolution: 1900

Pepperm1nts said
Quit your warmongering >;I

I'm not the one chomping into Manchuria! Japan wishes to uphold the territorial integrity of the Qing.

World in Revolution: 1900

Pepperm1nts said
Posted IC.Get yer asses to Vienna. Let's settle this like gentlemen.By this I mean, let me know if you'd like to attend and I'll whip up a PM where we can all take turns speaking on behalf of our country. We can throw in some neutral countries if you want. The point is to settle the matter in an organized and diplomatic fashion.

Can't we just have an international slap fight instead?

World in Revolution: 1861

Ab said
We did a WiR 1776 right before 1920 Mk II. It was... lacklustre; although I enjoyed it. Tbh earlier-period WiRs don't seem to fare well, although WiR 1810 or something might be interesting. You could also do an RPG version of 1920; that time period has astounding versatility. Frankly thoygh, I think a 1861 reboot is the best bet.

Would you be willing to GM a reboot of 1861? I don't believe anyone else here really has any experience running one of these.

World in Revolution: 1861

Ab said
I disagree. WiR is never the same. To take the Paradox WiRs as an example, 1861 Mk I and 1861 Mk II were completely different; as are 1920 Mk I and the ongoing Mk II. Different people playing different nations half the time, lessons learned from Mk I taken into account, different agendas etc. I'd be fine continuing and helping you all out -- 1861 is my far my fave time period for WiR -- but starting afresh isn't half bad either.

Exactly this. If you don't want to slog through the same thing again just pick a different nation, everyone has learned a lot from the last one and it'd give you a new point of view on the events going on around the world.