Avatar of Sanctus Spooki
  • Last Seen: 7 yrs ago
  • Joined: 8 yrs ago
  • Posts: 734 (0.25 / day)
  • VMs: 8
  • Username history
    1. Sanctus Spooki 8 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

7 yrs ago
Current You bastards killed Momu194!
7 yrs ago
Holy Cow, guys I think the bot might actually be sentient. I might actually cry at this beautiful sight... all it needed was a friend! Really though I'm amazed it actually shut up...
1 like
7 yrs ago
You can try all you want. I know I am far too biased to ever believe otherwise.
7 yrs ago
If you are concerned with power, popularity or control, yes your reputation matters. Regarding truth, morality, and such, less so. Off topic, but CREED II is gonna be awesome.
2 likes
7 yrs ago
Well, that depends on what you are concerned with.

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Banned for forgetting the greatest role Tom Cruise ever had.
I am going to allow this, merely to discover my detractors' and to grind them into dust.

Vote at your own peril.
In Spam 7 yrs ago Forum: Spam Forum
@FreeElk

Up until this moment, I believed that the great Kingdom of Spooki had no need for a national anthem. Now I see that I was blinded by my own shining darkness. Truly I have been a fool. This king is humbled, and bows before you, wise woman.

SUBJECTS!

REJOICE!
The Spooki Army grows by the hour.

@Neo Is Delight You shall have an honoured place among the faithful once my kingdom finds peace.
"Ayyy Gurl! How 'bout I show you my lock, stock and smoking barrel?"
I'm the dude playing a dude disguised as another dude.

You may refer to me as 'Your Majesty" or 'Your Holiness'
As a devout Anglican, being the king makes me the equivalent of the Pope. No need for an election.

Now that I think of it though... I do need an Archbishop.
Well, to begin, I enjoy the subtle disparaging comments of the author of the article. I am also a tad curious as to the omitted hyperlinks and graphs.

I began to try and read the entire thing, until after awhile I realized that he was essentially just reiterating what numerous other people have attempted to explain before (whether it be incorrect/correct) I ended up scrolling to the bottom, expecting there to be a reply from Google HQ, lo and behold, I was right, and the general message of the reply basically informed everyone that Google would be dismissing this memo, and was hoping to sweep it under the rug. Pretty much par for the course whenever someone attempts to broach this conversation.

One thing I did think was clearly wrong however, (before I lost my patience and skipped to the end) was the argument that men are more status driven. This just seems silly, you could perhaps argue that men and women attempt to achieve status in different ways, but to outright say that men have a higher drive for status, seems a bit... whats the word? Whatever, fill in the gap.

I feel so bad for the man who wrote this though. He's undoubtedly going to suffer in some way for this.
Is this one not a homicidal maniac? It's occurred to me that if my bloodline is to continue, some of them will actually need to survive. And not Jimmy. He rustles to much.
@Sanctus Spooki

Today you are older than yesterday, but not older than you will be tomorrow. 2017 has blessed you with another marker of your birth, but the future may not be so kind. Savor what you have while you have it, for someday you and everything around you will die.


Truly your powers of divination leave one awestruck. Have you ever considered a career as the Imperial Soothsayer?
© 2007-2025
BBCode Cheatsheet