Yeah I'm cool with that.
SillyPhilly Member
The Mythic Radiance Dragon
- Last Seen: 6 yrs ago
- Joined: 9 yrs ago
- Posts: 104 (0.03 / day)
- VMs: 0
-
Username history
- SillyPhilly 9 yrs ago
Status
User has no status, yet
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
Well alright. But I'm on a phone right now and I didn't realize everythin I pointed out was already pointed out. Did not have the luxury of a full mouse and keyboard. I also did not catch your first warnin so that's a bit unfair to me but whatever.
Tail Spear: Again, you actually can't tribute from the graveyard. Just have it use tributes from tge hand since the in hand cost would balance this out. Also 1000 atk plus piercing on what is effectively a revival card seems a little too strong and your monsters are big anyways.
Supreme Tyrant Dragon: Still needs a once per turn clause and have its attack restricted to only monsters. Better yet have it so it can only attack monsters.
Tyrant Dragon Overlord: The wording you want is "This card can be tribute summoned but tributing dragon-type monsters from your hand and/or banishing dragon-type monsters from your graveyard". Also summon protection is superbusted on card that is also protected from spell-based spot removal.
Edit: Was busy composin when you posted above. Sorry if I got preachy.
Supreme Tyrant Dragon: Still needs a once per turn clause and have its attack restricted to only monsters. Better yet have it so it can only attack monsters.
Tyrant Dragon Overlord: The wording you want is "This card can be tribute summoned but tributing dragon-type monsters from your hand and/or banishing dragon-type monsters from your graveyard". Also summon protection is superbusted on card that is also protected from spell-based spot removal.
Edit: Was busy composin when you posted above. Sorry if I got preachy.
Nah dude. Matchups should be a thing.
@dragonmancer
Wow. Ok. Issues
#1: Because of your fusion monster's name clause you can't actually make it since you can only run a max. of 3 of each card in a deck. This can be solved with just havin it treated at Tyrant Dragon while on the field or in the grave.
#2:It's "attack again" effect is kind of busted. Change it to "attack another monster once again in a row" and put a once per turn clause on it.
#3:Tail Spear just doesn't work. For one you can't tribute summon from the graveyard.
#4. It's activation requires you to have no monsters but then it wants you to tribute monsters from both the field and hand. If you need to have an open field to use it then why have the option to tribute from the field?
#5: 1000 atk is kind of big, especially for a revival equip. Remove this.
#6: The wordin youre lookin for is "if the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead."
#7: Not quite sure why it needs to be treated as a Tyrant Dragon spell when it already has Tyrant Dragon in the name.
#8: What do you mean "tributed from the graveyard"? Don't you mean banished?
#9: It's effect that makes it attack again should require the destroyed monster to be sent to the graveyard.
#10: Once again, since this has a name clause you can't more than 3 of it. You are currently runnin' 6 Tyrant Dragons.
#11: A card that is unaffected by traps AND can attack multiple times AND is a casual plus 1 as soon as it comes out seems terribly broken. Pick 2 and scrap the third.
Wow. Ok. Issues
#1: Because of your fusion monster's name clause you can't actually make it since you can only run a max. of 3 of each card in a deck. This can be solved with just havin it treated at Tyrant Dragon while on the field or in the grave.
#2:It's "attack again" effect is kind of busted. Change it to "attack another monster once again in a row" and put a once per turn clause on it.
#3:Tail Spear just doesn't work. For one you can't tribute summon from the graveyard.
#4. It's activation requires you to have no monsters but then it wants you to tribute monsters from both the field and hand. If you need to have an open field to use it then why have the option to tribute from the field?
#5: 1000 atk is kind of big, especially for a revival equip. Remove this.
#6: The wordin youre lookin for is "if the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead."
#7: Not quite sure why it needs to be treated as a Tyrant Dragon spell when it already has Tyrant Dragon in the name.
#8: What do you mean "tributed from the graveyard"? Don't you mean banished?
#9: It's effect that makes it attack again should require the destroyed monster to be sent to the graveyard.
#10: Once again, since this has a name clause you can't more than 3 of it. You are currently runnin' 6 Tyrant Dragons.
#11: A card that is unaffected by traps AND can attack multiple times AND is a casual plus 1 as soon as it comes out seems terribly broken. Pick 2 and scrap the third.
@Satoshi Kyou
A blue-haired girl, already in her school uniform, had just walked into the center as Rumi was getting ready to leave. Her stomach growled, having only had an apple for breakfast. She was trying to save her money so she could eat a heartier lunch later. As she casually walked by the aroma of the contents of Rumi's basket caught her attention.
"...Free food?"
She ran over to the girl and stopped right in front of her.
"Oh...uh, I can carry that for you if you don't mind. You look exhausted having biked all the way here with that heavy basket. You need to go easy on yourself."
A blue-haired girl, already in her school uniform, had just walked into the center as Rumi was getting ready to leave. Her stomach growled, having only had an apple for breakfast. She was trying to save her money so she could eat a heartier lunch later. As she casually walked by the aroma of the contents of Rumi's basket caught her attention.
"...Free food?"
She ran over to the girl and stopped right in front of her.
"Oh...uh, I can carry that for you if you don't mind. You look exhausted having biked all the way here with that heavy basket. You need to go easy on yourself."
Once again, I have made best girl.
@KOgamingAccepted. Am I?
So am I accepted?
© 2007-2024