http://www.roleplayerguild.com/users/mysterion
If you haven't noticed, there is now a user list/search page, link on the header.
It's like watching two protégés squabble for the favor of their master.But I am the one and only master No, I'm just trying to get my point across. I don't see why such a system is worthwhile, and as I pointed out, if he feels it is important he can work on it himself, once his dev environment is set up.
Mahz will eventually be implementing image uploading. Why would he spend the time to implement a system that allows users to use any avatar they want without them having to worry about the size, when he is going to eventually implement a system that will do the same thing anyways? The opportunity cost of implementing your system which will inevitably be deprecated is so low that it isn't worth it. If you care about it so much, perhaps implement it yourself? I have to disagree that the load will be on the server – but even if it is, it still will inhibit loading times, just to make trust in the user unnecessary. I'd like to think that the community is more than trustworthy enough to wait until image uploading is implemented, unless you think otherwise?<snip>It's a system that'll take less time to implement, won't require server space to implement, since images are stored elsewhere, and it makes it easier on users of the current system.
If you mean doing it client-side on page load, consider the fact that this would have to be done for every profile picture on the page, and done every single load. It would have a devastating effect on load times. Obviously not something that is desirable.Though, cycling back to the beginning of the conversation, we have the ability to resize it in the embedding process.But won't that problem still persist when you include the option to upload pictures to the site directly?No, because the images can be resized during the upload process. Since they currently are stored off-site, this is not currently possible hence us having this discussion to begin with EDIT: @Captain Jordan - to my knowledge, it definitely isn't an if. It is merely far too unimportant to worry about at the time being. Significant features, bug-fixes, etc are far more important, thus image uploading won't really be thought about until it needs to be.
But won't that problem still persist when you include the option to upload pictures to the site directly?No, because the images can be resized during the upload process. Since they currently are stored off-site, this is not currently possible hence us having this discussion to begin with EDIT: @Captain Jordan - to my knowledge, it definitely isn't an if. It is merely far too unimportant to worry about at the time being. Significant features, bug-fixes, etc are far more important, thus image uploading won't really be thought about until it needs to be.
Though, I would personally be careful when saying that something "cannot be done" in a language. I've learned throughout the years of programming that there is often, if not always, a workaround to any problem.Seconded. EDIT: Did some googling, and it seems its actually really easy. In theory, anyway. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/170624/javascript-image-resize EDIT2: actually, that'd be done every time the page is loaded, for every image. Not efficient. But the point remains that it is possible. EDIT3: Too many edits. Anyways, perhaps something like this? No idea how it works, but it looks interesting. http://www.plupload.com/
http://aheckmann.github.io/gm/ I found this with a simple google search, and there are most likely other options out there. Definitely don't need to install a server-side language for it :DAs I mentioned, it doesn't have to be done with PHP. It does have to be done with a server-size language like PHP. Java, .NET, PHP, Ruby, etc., any of these would work. I'm not certain how uploading the image is going to change much, HTML, CSS and Javascript don't have the capabilities to change and store modified images on the server. Something else will have to be used, unless Mahz has a trick up his sleeve that I've never heard of. ETA: No offense taken. It's just a friendly discussion. :)Just because it isn't used doesn't mean it can't be installed on the server. There is no pure node.js way to do it, it would have to be done by a server-side programming language, not a scripting language like JS. At least if you wanted true rescaling (so it creates and stores an image of the correct size on the server) and not just resizing a larger image.Yes, but why would you install something just to implement one feature that will be deprecated once Mahz decides its time to add picture uploading? No offense but I don't see the logic behind it.
Just because it isn't used doesn't mean it can't be installed on the server. There is no pure node.js way to do it, it would have to be done by a server-side programming language, not a scripting language like JS. At least if you wanted true rescaling (so it creates and stores an image of the correct size on the server) and not just resizing a larger image.Yes, but why would you install something just to implement one feature that will be deprecated once Mahz decides its time to add picture uploading? No offense but I don't see the logic behind it.