@Vilageidiotx
I'll see to it and try to come up with something. Historically accurate? Or we allowed some freeway here with monarchs?
I'll give leeway. They just have to make sense for the period, and for the character. I don't believe character building is that precise a science though, so I'm not going to brow beat.
But, like, I don't want somebody playing Thomas Jefferson to sound like Ron Paul, or a European King to sound like a completely modern republic type. That is the biggest thing I'd be worried about is super-cringey anachronisms.
<Snipped quote by Vilageidiotx>
This George III, I hope.
I'm really wanting to do
.
So, the colonies are still technically in place in North America, but the American Revolution is about to happen, or was, based on the political climate back then. Any plans for that?
That's definitely a question, but a more peculiar one in the context of the weather catastrophe and parliament turning up on the colonies doorstep. This is the enlightenment though, the ideas are still there, they are just going to percolate differently in this context. So whereas the colonists arguing about taxation without representation or the distance between London and the new world are going to be presented with a different math, there is the possibility that idealist Republican types might see the flight of the European monarchies as a chance push for change. Exactly how that plays out is part of what we will have to play with.