Eternal_Flame said
since my army cap is larger now.

Not hugely sure what you're asking, but army replenishment stays the same. 2000 troops per season, no matter how many territories you have. It just increases the max troops you can have.

NewSun said
Not hugely sure what you're asking, but army replenishment stays the same. 2000 troops per season, no matter how many territories you have. It just increases the max troops you can have.

let say that i have an army consist of 10k troops, attacking a region and claimed it, my army caps is risen to 15k am i right?
can i add those 5k extra to my existing 10k army assuming that the loss will stay the same?

Eternal_Flame said
let say that i have an army consist of 10k troops, attacking a region and claimed it, my army caps is risen to 15k am i right? can i add those 5k extra to my existing 10k army assuming that the loss will stay the same?

No, you will have to build them from scratch.

No no.
Lets say you have a single army of 10k, and you claim a territory. That would raise the total number of troops you could have in your nation in total, not that army, and it would not grant an immediate extra 5k soldiers.

A better example would be if you attacked with an army of 20k, your maximum possible army size. You claim a territory, and your army cap goes up to 25k. You would still need to keep adding 2k soldiers per season to get up to that max.

Syrianhampster I have replied to the private message you sent me. I am of the utmost willingness to do either of the things detailed therein. But I must know which course to take.

NewSun said
No no. Lets say you have a single army of 10k, and you claim a territory. That would raise the total number of troops you could have in your nation in total, not that army, and it would not grant an immediate extra 5k soldiers. A better example would be if you attacked with an army of 20k, your maximum possible army size. You claim a territory, and your army cap goes up to 25k. You would still need to keep adding 2k soldiers per season to get up to that max.

Correct.

This prevents players from a sustained blitzkrieg, creates the need for diverting troops to crisis points and creates realistic defensive scenarios.

That was the plan anyways.

SyrianHamster said
Correct.This prevents players from a sustained blitzkrieg, creates the need for diverting troops to crisis points and creates realistic defensive scenarios.That was the plan anyways.

ok i see that, thanks :D

Just to clarify to everyone, the seasons work in this order:

WINTER // SPRING // SUMMER // AUTUMN // WINTER // YEAR CHANGE // WINTER // SPRING // SUMMER // AUTUMN // WINTER // YEAR CHANGE ETC

Yes, there's two winters a year - this is because Christmas/New Years fall right in the middle of it.

Do not question my logic or I shall smite you.

WINTER IS COMING with exceptional frequency

NewSun said
WINTER IS COMING

Hahaha... you're a funny man.

Murdered, forced into labour, raped and used as vile offspring factories, the desperate women of the former Kingdom of Poland have risen up in arms against their Isarimer masters. Though seemingly a pitiful attempt at liberty from the outside, this movement has garnered strength across the region, as more women flock to the cause in a bid to escape a fate worse the death. Taking note of the situation, the Slavic Lords to the south have assembled their forces for an attack to coincide with the civil strife.

There. I can also strike though words, AND PEOPLE.

But no, in all seriousness that is not going to happen. OR IS IT? Be funny again and find out. Wonder how the Isarimer would deal with a resurgence of the black plague? *maniacal laughter*

SyrianHamster said
Hahaha... you're a funny man. There. I can also strike though words, AND PEOPLE. But no, in all seriousness that is not going to happen. OR IS IT? Be funny again and find out. Wonder how the Isarimer would deal with a resurgence of the black plague? *maniacal laughter*

Heh.

Heh.

Heheheh.

For all you know, isarimer women could be tiny, walking wombs. Beware the resurgence of the 90% vestigial bodies!

No, but I could have easily have made isarimer females a part of the regular population. I suuuuure hope I don't get punished for a fluff choice that was made simply to be unique and different ;)
Aw black plague? How lovely of you! But considering these people eat rotting corpses that are literally piled tens of feet into the air, their resistance to infection might be quite high. Or low.
I hadn't considered it.

Have I ever told you that you're my best friend and I love you and I like that shirt you're wearing today?

EDIT: Maybe a bit too strong for some of the younger members.

Anyways, catch y'all in about 16 hours.

SyrianHamster said
It's fine, George R R whatever his name is made rape and the oppression of women okay in fantasy settings somehow. It's not a taboo anymore. It's medieval, and women don't got nothing. Seriously, every book I've read that has been written recently has that same theme, and I don't know why. Sure its a truer depiction of the bleakness of the times, but meh. It's like we've taken a step backwards; I liked my testicle tearing Amazons, sure as Hell beats the real life annoying creature that leaves a mess everywhere and THEN ACCUSES ME OF NOT TIDYING UP THE BITCH GJGSJFJ£K!"$!$!"/ But yeah back to the main subject: I'm not wearing a shirt ;) I'm going to bed now,Night all!

I think he is only able to get away with it because he has some pretty sound reasoning: the things that happen in a Song of Ice and Fire are in no way worse than the atrocities that occur in real life and have continued to do so throughout human history. The tragedies and horrible treatment, segregation and prejudice against certain groups has, and will, always be worse in real life than it is in his or any other person's fiction. Though I do feel the need to defend my creative process (LOL) in this instance as while most fantasy novels at the moment are drawing on GRRM as thematic inspiration because of it's success, I wasn't even considering it. I was just being lazy as fuck and couldn't be bothered to think up, describe and find pictures depicting the women (as horrifying and manly as they probably would be), and realised that it actually fits the culture somewhat. Lets face it, if a mysogonistic society could get away with things like that today, they would do the exact same thing. Hell, i'd be willing to bet that extreme feminists would also do the same to men. So that makes it okay, promise ;)

(I know you're not wearing a shirt. That's why I like it.) (We're running the risk of bromance here. Don't tell my lady friend and I won't tell yours)

Erm, maybe I stumbled into the wrong thread...

Do you have a link to the current map that isn't on this website. My phone won't load and no access to internet on my computer.

If you don't can you please load it onto a website like imgur, china is dreadfully boring and I have been playing ck2 for so long that it's getting boring.

I should be getting up a post this afternoon.

The Vrael are good to go, as is Byzantium. Now I go sleep, for real this time.

Season ends tomorrow.

Ak! I will get my post up immediately.

Wait, we can have leader traits without being hiveminds?

So Boerd said
Wait, we can have leader traits without being hiveminds?

I was actually thinking on what to give you, to even things a little.

- Champion of Mankind = -10% losses against Gorikan races to armies led by this man // Army immune to Isarimer's horrifying trait.