I'm not looking to get laid though :(

lies aza hungers

Waving a sword around on the internet is akin to stabbing yourself in the gut

*Enters thread cautiously. Reads article. Reads replies from participants.* ...I'm surprised no radical feminists have shown up yet. I thought for sure there'd be a war going on.

*Enters thread cautiously. Reads article. Reads replies from participants.* ...I'm surprised no radical feminists have shown up yet. I thought for sure there'd be a war going on.

Nah. Radical feminists are rather rare of the Guild. Most of whom basically left for Iwaku anyways.

Does it really take that much effort to make it a link you're ruining my life.

Hank you suck. Goodnight.

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

Satire still wants to prove a point. If you think the author isn't on one level or another trying to say that he thinks women would never function in a manless society then you need to review the definition of satire.

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

Satire still wants to prove a point. If you think the author isn't on one level or another trying to say that he thinks women would never function in a manless society then you need to review the definition of satire.

It's what he's superficially saying but I doubt that it's the true point of the article. Have you read the little author synopsis to the left of the article? I interpreted the whole thing as lancing the dragon ("making fun of" -- Dutch proverbs are weird) with men trying to prove the patriarchy is superior based on evidence as flimsy as this.

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments.

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments.

I deliberately didn't.

To clear up any potential confusion, I don't actually agree with the superiority of the patriarchy, I just found the article funny.