Why Women (And Feminism) Suck

[Larfleeze]

I'm not looking to get laid though :(

@Azarthes

lies aza hungers

@Halo

ohhoho

[mdk]

Feminism works great, when it can stand on the shoulders of the accomplishments of vastly successful patriarchy. Now if you applied the same conclusion to atheism, an interesting thing happens.......

[TheMusketMan]

*Enters thread cautiously. Reads article. Reads replies from participants.* ...I'm surprised no radical feminists have shown up yet. I thought for sure there'd be a war going on.

[Robeatics]

Hey, I'm not a radfem but if you want me to start waving a sword around I can. (Or I can groan. That seems to be the only thing I can do in Hank's presence.)

[aza]

Waving a sword around on the internet is akin to stabbing yourself in the gut

[Robeatics]

Waving a sword around on the internet is akin to stabbing yourself in the gut

@Azarthes

Damn. Groaning it is. Hank you suck. Goodnight.

[Gwazi Magnum]

*Enters thread cautiously. Reads article. Reads replies from participants.* ...I'm surprised no radical feminists have shown up yet. I thought for sure there'd be a war going on.

@TheMusketMan

Nah. Radical feminists are rather rare of the Guild. Most of whom basically left for Iwaku anyways.

[Robeatics]

*Enters thread cautiously. Reads article. Reads replies from participants.* ...I'm surprised no radical feminists have shown up yet. I thought for sure there'd be a war going on.

@TheMusketMan

Nah. Radical feminists are rather rare of the Guild. Most of whom basically left for Iwaku anyways.

@Gwazi Magnum

I don't think I've seen any radical feminists here, if you mean the kind who believe trans women aren't """"real women"""" and that men suck, yadda yadda.

[Hank]

Does it really take that much effort to make it a link you're ruining my life.

@ImANargleHunter

Fixed.

Hank you suck. Goodnight.

@Robeatics

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

[Robeatics]

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

@Hank

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

[Hank]

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

@Hank

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

@Robeatics

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

[Robeatics]

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

@Hank

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

@Robeatics

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

@Hank

Satire still wants to prove a point. If you think the author isn't on one level or another trying to say that he thinks women would never function in a manless society then you need to review the definition of satire.

[Hank]

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

@Hank

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

@Robeatics

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

@Hank

Satire still wants to prove a point. If you think the author isn't on one level or another trying to say that he thinks women would never function in a manless society then you need to review the definition of satire.

@Robeatics

It's what he's superficially saying but I doubt that it's the true point of the article. Have you read the little author synopsis to the left of the article? I interpreted the whole thing as lancing the dragon ("making fun of" -- Dutch proverbs are weird) with men trying to prove the patriarchy is superior based on evidence as flimsy as this.

[Primal Conundrum]

I have a feeling that those women were probably from the city. I grew up in the middle of the damn country, I like building stuff and setting up shelter and the like. Those women best be glad I wasn't involved there, I would have either kicked their asses into doing work or else gone off to live on my own and left them to their fate. Holy shit they sound completely inept.

[Robeatics]

Don't yell at me, I'm just the messenger.

@Hank

But are you actually trying to prove anything or are you just trying to work people up? If it's the former then you've got a pathetically lacking source.

@Robeatics

It's a satirical article, but clearly too subtle for you.

@Hank

Satire still wants to prove a point. If you think the author isn't on one level or another trying to say that he thinks women would never function in a manless society then you need to review the definition of satire.

@Robeatics

It's what he's superficially saying but I doubt that it's the true point of the article. Have you read the little author synopsis to the left of the article? I interpreted the whole thing as lancing the dragon ("making fun of" -- Dutch proverbs are weird) with men trying to prove the patriarchy is superior based on evidence as flimsy as this.

@Hank

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments. Jesus, I'm gonna get a headache. This article is to misogyny what Bloodwulf is to 80s ultraviolence.

[Hank]

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments.

@Robeatics

I deliberately didn't.

[Robeatics]

That is a very valid interpretation, but by the author posting it up on a fervently anti-feminist website filled with men who insist womens' struggles don't exist sort of makes it more like a parody of anti-feminist parodies in that it means everything it says. Just read the comments.

@Robeatics

I deliberately didn't.

@Hank

I wish I'd done the same, to be honest. </swordwave>

[Hank]

To clear up any potential confusion, I don't actually agree with the superiority of the patriarchy, I just found the article funny.

[Robeatics]

To clear up any potential confusion, I don't actually agree with the superiority of the patriarchy, I just found the article funny.

@Hank

I disagree on the funny part (it jabs some sore spots), but to be honest I wish it could be said that everyone reading that article also took it as something stupid and flimsy. Blegh.

[Halo]

Holy shit, someone actually took this seriously. If you can't laugh at the article, laugh at the fucktards who actually believe this stuff. Their desperate insecurity and the resultant half-self-loathing, half-self-centred narcissism they all exhibit is fucking hilarious.