Well...this character
The way everything is laid out is kind of...clunky for starters. Makes it sound like he betrayed Britannia because of the massacre but in reality he was already a traitor and spy a mere month prior. Why even bother saying "It is coincidence" about killing his commander then in the paragraph after explain that a month prior he was already working with the Black Knights? Not good to make character history so jumbled.
Frankly the character just sounds like a traitor who is also a bit of a coward. Don't get me wrong that can actually make for a pretty interesting character but its hard to see how the Black Knights would even think about trusting someone like that. Also the copy and paste bit is in bad taste and I agree with @vancexentan about that.
Also I would think someone like him would be used on the EU front rather than in Japan for starters, seems weird that he'd be over there in the first place. The character just really doesn't seem to fit all that well with the setting ya know?
The way everything is laid out is kind of...clunky for starters. Makes it sound like he betrayed Britannia because of the massacre but in reality he was already a traitor and spy a mere month prior. Why even bother saying "It is coincidence" about killing his commander then in the paragraph after explain that a month prior he was already working with the Black Knights? Not good to make character history so jumbled.
Frankly the character just sounds like a traitor who is also a bit of a coward. Don't get me wrong that can actually make for a pretty interesting character but its hard to see how the Black Knights would even think about trusting someone like that. Also the copy and paste bit is in bad taste and I agree with @vancexentan about that.
Also I would think someone like him would be used on the EU front rather than in Japan for starters, seems weird that he'd be over there in the first place. The character just really doesn't seem to fit all that well with the setting ya know?