I like the idea. It -- hypothetically at least -- allows people to not squat on certain characters and keep them inactive.
How attached is everyone to the character rotation idea? I'm having second thoughts about it and might restructure the RP to a more traditional apply for the character you want.
I like the idea. It -- hypothetically at least -- allows people to not squat on certain characters and keep them inactive.
Could be other ways to ensure people don't squat on characters such as limiting how many characters one can have and putting rules on supporting cast lists. Some of the sheets in previous games have laid claim to so many characters it's gotten ridiculous.
The other thing we can do is apply a rule about posting frequency and if a player hasn't posted in a certain amount of time then their character goes up for auction.
<Snipped quote by Lord Wraith>
On another site I was involved in, we gave people two weeks to post before they got it taken from them.
@Lord Wraith I think that posts should remain camon though, as retconning all the time makes a mess. Maybe also a mandatory arc completion before collaboration?
@Lord Wraith that sounds acceptable to me. Also the idea of keeping supporting cast to actual close legacies rather than far off distant ones? As you said it got kinda silly.
Me being me, could I theoretically do a story set in Gotham before Batman? As long as I don't play with the timeframe and say it's someone who shouldn't have existed before Batman came around.