HWNDU chapter 7 is happening. Let's see how long it takes them to get it this time.

HWNDU chapter 7 is happening. Let's see how long it takes them to get it this time.

That means a new Internet Historian episode is to be released in the future as well. What a great series this has been thus far. Better than anything you could pay to see, I think. In fact, the second chapter I at one point was right by - too bad at the time I wasn't familiar to the events and that it was taking place there. A bit disappointing, I might say.

As I was driving home from work, I was thinking of this. And suddenly I find an article on the subject. Though this newest one claims it's neatly impossible that we're living in a computer simulation. I've been thinking that, but I was no expert in the subject.
pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/physics/physic…

@POOHEAD189 If you want to have a go with mind theories, just explore the Brain in a vat theory.

Addition: I think I had a debate with someone about this here once. It was about truth being subjective or objective. My statement is that the truth is always objective, personal truths aren't really truths so much as they are perspectives/opinions. And, the proof of objective truth is the simple and inarguable premise that somewhere there is existence. We may be figments of an imagination, but there has to be an imaginer beyond that.

And that's all there is to that, lol, way to get me going on philosophy.

This is perhaps the one opportunity I will be able to post a relevant cat meme, of which is courtesy of Julian Assange.

Trump's America

"Yeah that's right, pregnant, grieving widow. Grow a pair."

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/355972-miss-school-named-for-confederate-leader-to-be-renamed-after-obama

Jackson Mississippi :P

I suppose a whole new generation can take up the Thanks Obama meme.

Now that is some IRL trolling.

@POOHEAD189, @Dynamo Frokane

We are downgrading this from fake news to very fake news. So fake that it might hurt, yet that is what happens when you are attempting to run a smear campaign. But certainly, let us attempt to exploit tragedy with feigned "outrage" over a comment that is totally unverified and goes against what is accepted as the general practice of a person's business, let alone supposed proof.

There's no way this can possibly be a distraction from all of this, which seems to be the Russia we were looking for. @mdk's link is down, but do not worry, there's plenty of it circulating at the moment. I am certain the mainstream media will be right on that; they are well known for their honesty, believe me.

@The Harbinger of Ferocity I completely agree. Mostly because the guy he said it about was black. Those articles you posted aren't on the soldier in question.

@Andreyich Not sure if you remember this, but a few weeks back you scoffed at the notion of the sidesword and backsword being put into the same or similar category. I remembered it tonight and got somewhat curious on your reasoning since I'll be writing my sword article soon. Was it a historical perspective, or how they were used?

They are character statements and supporting evidence, word against word as it were, @POOHEAD189. Is it not a bit odd that not a single other person is corroborating this story and that by and large, everything is contrarian to what is being told? It is almost as if there's a motive here to spin the truth in a favorable direction.

And do trust me, I am very keenly aware of those we lost and the way one of them is being exploited by the media to further their narrative. In fact, let's put a picture up of these men.

@POOHEAD189, @Dynamo Frokane

We are downgrading this from fake news to very fake news. So fake that it might hurt, yet that is what happens when you are attempting to run a smear campaign. But certainly, let us attempt to exploit tragedy with feigned "outrage" over a comment that is totally unverified and goes against what is accepted as the general practice of a person's business, let alone supposed proof.

There's no way this can possibly be a distraction from all of this, which seems to be the Russia we were looking for. @mdk's link is down, but do not worry, there's plenty of it circulating at the moment. I am certain the mainstream media will be right on that; they are well known for their honesty, believe me.

No, no, the left is SUPER genuinely concerned about the troops. Just look at it.

It's totally a coincidence that they've suddenly discovered moral outrage now that a dead soldier can be used as a football, on the same day that their nuclear goddamn treason went public. Total coincidence. Pay no attention to the man behind the corner.

The congresswoman and the family in question confirmed the report. Here.

Though I will say that I agree the media itself is taking too much of a spotlight on this. That is also somewhat disrespectful, even if letting people know the standards of a president are important. I will say that liberals can also be batshit crazy like in your articles as well, sir. @mdk

I will say that liberals can also be batshit crazy like in your articles as well, sir. @mdk

And I'm in danger of attributing that crazy to the left in general, because I generalize, so apologies in advance if I wind up getting there.

Yes, they confirmed their own reporting, which is not unexpected in the slightest. They made a claim and are choosing to dedicate to it, to which I might add is almost assuredly a losing battle. On a tangent however, I severely doubt this was an act of the media to "know the standards of what is presidential", so to speak. If there is a group of people that haven't any idea what that is, that is the mainstream media, who have been so downgraded that some of them are now seated in the back rows of the foreign press section; that is the level of incompetence and lack of credibility they have shelved and resigned themselves to. This is utterly ignoring that the backing person in question is a known enemy of the President of the United States and his administration, which creates a bit of conflict of interest, but the short can be summed up with this:

"I'm not the only person that was in the car, and I have proof, too. This man is a sick man," she said. "I have no reason to lie on the president of the United States with a dead soldier in my community."

Which is competing with this:

Later Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said there were no recordings of the call, but explained that Trump's "proof" amounted to there having been "several people in the room from the administration that were on the call, including Chief of Staff John Kelly."

By quality of claim alone, and that if it were to be hypothetically investigated, the statements of those in the office with President Trump are likely to be of greater magnitude and credibility, let alone number. I am going to err on the previously demonstrated examples and contrary claims by others that this is nothing more than a swipe at the President using a proxy - the widow - in order to distract from the fact that bigger things are bubbling up from the depths of the swamp.