Theoretically, governments aren't even necessary to manage the world today.

@Normie
Catchamber's original statement was arguing that humans today have the technology that makes government obsolete if we'd but utilize it.

<Snipped quote by catchamber>
It was my challenging that thesis that led to this discussion. And from what all of history, archaeology, and anthropology have shown us is that we as a species are in need of some form of societal structure.

You're the one defending the eternal necessity of governments, Then you have to admit that functional anarchy can exist.

Prove that there will always be a leader in every group.

Prove that groups can't form without the conscious effort to do so.

Prove that there can't be order without a solid direction.

Prove that everyone constantly wants more.

Prove that all of that's true in every possible circumstance.

And have yet to provide counter evidence of your own.

"Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.

"Sometimes I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true."

I'll admit, I'm just perplexed but intrigued by that gif and it's purpose. :I

...I have nothing more to add.

What actual human instances we have were in between having strong leadership and no strong leadership, people would willingly choose the latter category.

Well yeah, a SHITLOAD of people voted for Hilary.

<Snipped quote by mdk>
They loved her so much they voted for her multiple times! _{[citation needed]}