<Snipped quote by Valiance>
There are countless dimensions with boundless approaches. It would be arrogant for me to declare one way better than the other. But once you’ve invaded someone else’s experiment, you’ve forfeited your right to your own.
Why do you keep calling these things an experiment? That in itself shows you have a sense of detachment from these things beyond just the goal you've set. But why is it arrogant for you to declare one way better than others on a smaller scale, when you're doing exactly this on a larger scale, and inevitably leaving the same problem to exist in a more broken up manner across smaller scales, all while committing incalculable acts of
genocide to inevitably solve exactly nothing? I'm not sure where your shortsightedness stems from, but you can consider me the opposite of convinced.