BrobyDDark said
You're not the New Nat because the old Nat is still around and still being himself. If anything you're third in line to be Nat once he stops coming around. IF he stops coming around.

Shall I kill him for his place?

Larfleeze said
Shall I kill him for his place?

No. His time isn't up yet.

BrobyDDark said
You're not the New Nat because the old Nat is still around and still being himself. If anything you're third in line to be Nat once he stops coming around. IF he stops coming around.

you HAVE to admit though... Bottles is a good candidate for our future NAT. He hold ALL of the qualities of NAT and holds a bit of a cheery attitude. So he is like 4/5 star nat.

Drakel said
I think you completely misunderstand the situation but that is okay. There wasn't even hate until things escalated and even then (since this is obviously more so pointed at me) I was joking. I'll admit that I dislike him on a more personal level that you probably don't understand at all YET nor would care about (or should). Though as I said before I wasn't angry or anything, just pointing out he over-killed the joke I made on Jorick. If you read you could even see small hints of me still joking as well.

It was actually more directed at those hating on him just because they saw the opportunity to bitch about him, personally attacking him from out of the blue despite the fact that he'd done precisely eff-all to them to deserve it. Case in point is handily provided below by Broby. Yeah, okay, having a go over "killing your joke" is petty as shit, and if the joke was any good it'd stand on its own regardless of what Larfleeze said - the only thing that "killed the joke" is your whining about the joke being killed - but at least you had some reason for ragging on him. The others, not so much.

BrobyDDark said
You're not the New Nat because the old Nat is still around and still being himself. If anything you're third in line to be Nat once he stops coming around. IF he stops coming around.

A) Thanks for being a handy example.
B) Nat is not a position. Please stop encouraging the view that any of his nonsense is special or deserving of recognition in some way. I don't have anything real against Nat, but feeding randumb people negative attention is like giving rabbits an unlimited supply of viagra and Bugs Bunny porn and leaving them to themselves for a whole summer: they breed.

Drakel said
you HAVE to admit though... Bottles is a good candidate for our future NAT. He hold ALL of the qualities of NAT and holds a bit of a cheery attitude. So he is like 4/5 star nat.

Yeah, first candidate for Nat 2.0 is Bottles. It wouldn't even change the dynamic of Spam, except for the fact there would be less pony threads, although that is a good thing.

Larfleeze said
Shall I kill him for his place?

When you play a Game of Nat, you win or you die. There is no middle ground.

So kill him now...fulfill your destiny...and take your place on Nat's throne.

Halo said feeding randumb people negative attention is like giving rabbits an unlimited supply of viagra and Bugs Bunny porn and leaving them to themselves for a whole summer: .

Nah you got to remove the porn otherwise the rabbits wouldn't breed, they would rather lazily masturbate to Bunny Porn than spend any effort trying to convince the opposite sex to fuck them.

Halo said
It was actually more directed at those hating on him just because they saw the opportunity to bitch about him, personally attacking him from out of the blue despite the fact that he'd done precisely eff-all to them to deserve it. Case in point is handily provided below by Broby. Yeah, okay, having a go over "killing your joke" is petty as shit, and if the joke was any good it'd stand on its own regardless of what Larfleeze said - the only thing that "killed the joke" is your whining about the joke being killed - but at least you had some reason for ragging on him. The others, not so much. A) Thanks for being a handy example.B) Nat is not a position. Please stop encouraging the view that any of his nonsense is special or deserving of recognition in some way. I don't have anything real against Nat, but feeding randumb people negative attention is like giving rabbits an unlimited supply of viagra and Bugs Bunny porn and leaving them to themselves for a whole summer: .

I don't hate Larfleeze, or want to give him negative attention. What people hate about him is his tendency to show up randomly, insult people, and then continue doing it for the sake of getting a laugh when people respond. Kind of like before we stopped blaming Nat for everything. As for the "Nat being a position or title" thing, this is more of a joke that new people in Spam tend to be cheery indivisuals who post random stuff because why not. It's more of a trope than anything, and definitely not anything offensive because, again, we stopped whining about Nat doing that stuff.

Okay

Halo said
It was actually more directed at those hating on him just because they saw the opportunity to bitch about him, personally attacking him from out of the blue despite the fact that he'd done precisely eff-all to them to deserve it. Case in point is handily provided below by Broby. Yeah, okay, having a go over "killing your joke" is petty as shit, and if the joke was any good it'd stand on its own regardless of what Larfleeze said - the only thing that "killed the joke" is your whining about the joke being killed - but at least you had some reason for ragging on him. The others, not so much.

Again, most of that was joking if you actually read. Plus he left quite a huge sour taste in everyone else's mouth by being a prick to other people in other threads. Part of the reason why so much negativity is being directed at him is because he self inflicts by him himself by insulting others who really don't deserve it, even when they try to joke with him. And as I said right now it is all jokes but I do have a very legitimate reason in heavily disliking him. Right now though? Nope.

I do agree that this wasn't the time or place to take aggression against him since in this thread there wasn't much done other than him "killing my joke" and me making flat ans stupid rape jokes off of it. In another thread and another time though, maybe other people's aggression towards him is justified. So I guess we do agree on that point.

So glad ya'll's debate over people have buried some goodbyes. Good going.

Edit: but this is spam, so it's all whatever.

Beatrix said
So glad ya'll's debate over people have buried some goodbyes. Good going.

That's why I stopped replying.

Beatrix said
So glad ya'll's debate over people have buried some goodbyes. Good going.Edit: but this is spam, so it's all whatever.

Agreed. Things were going really well for some time too.

Lets get back to our goodbyes, laughs and games like we were 10 minutes ago.

When did Broby stop being considered Nat 2.0? Cause I'm pretty that was a thing at some point.

Wait so is Drako not one of the people everyone expects to come back in a few weeks? Because it seems like there's a lot of super-sincere reactions here.

mbl said
Wait so is Drako not one of the people everyone expects to come back in a few weeks? Because it seems like there's a lot of super-sincere reactions here.

He's a lot more mature than many of the others who've expressed intentions to depart, so we give him the respect he deserves.

mbl said
When did Broby stop being considered Nat 2.0? Cause I'm pretty that was a thing at some point.

That was never a thing.

Halo said B) Nat is not a position. Please stop encouraging the view that any of his nonsense is special or deserving of recognition in some way. I don't have anything real against Nat, but feeding randumb people negative attention is like giving rabbits an unlimited supply of viagra and Bugs Bunny porn and leaving them to themselves for a whole summer: .

Discussion of non-amputee porn in Drago's leaving thread? Disgraceful!

Anyway bye Drago, enjoy yourself.

Peace drago, hopefully you still hang around Skype so I can tune into your occasional broadcast.

Imma cry