[OOC] Fire Emblem: The Sword of Conquest

[Freeshooter92]

FUCK THAT THEY WALK ON WATER.

[Psyker Landshark]

They fucking fight on water.

[Freeshooter92]

So what does gender identity mean, exactly? I gots no idea m8.

[MULTI_MEDIA_MAN]

Freeshooter92 said
So what does gender identity mean, exactly? I gots no idea m8.

I'll go with what I was taught in anthropology (I don't subscribe to the particular theory, but it has its merits): Gender and gender roles are a social construct which have differences between cultures, whereas sex is a biological fact, and barring mutations, is clear-cut male or female. If one doesn't believe their gender matches with the sex they have, they're known as transgender. A transgender man would be, biologically, female, though they identify as a male. It's considered extremely rude to refer to a person by the pronoun set that they don't identify with. Some people think that everybody should ask everybody for 'their pronouns' when they meet. I think the <1% of people I might offend will be mature enough to understand that for the most part, people aren't transgender and use the pronouns that match their biological sex.

[Freeshooter92]

Also, I need more info on Rak'thurr...

Edit: Well... Couldn't we just put something like (Prefers to be referred to as male) by the biological gender instead of adding another category that will (mostly, I don't know) be the same?

[MULTI_MEDIA_MAN]

Freeshooter92 said
Also, I need more info on Rak'thurr...

There is none that we know of. You might be able to create something for the GM to approve and add to the OP.

[Freeshooter92]

MULTI_MEDIA_MAN said
There is none that we know of. You might be able to create something for the GM to approve and add to the OP.

I'll just make assumptions and change if necessary.

[MULTI_MEDIA_MAN]

Freeshooter92 said
Also, I need more info on Rak'thurr...Edit: Well... Couldn't we just put something like (Prefers to be referred to as male) by the biological gender instead of adding another category that will (mostly, I don't know) be the same?

Probably. But if that's how they make the CS, that's how it is.

[StarInaBox]

Wow. The OOC got a lot of posts reeeeally fast.

[Freeshooter92]

Blame meeeeeeeee...

Ah, I see. Starinabox. you are a star. in a box. It's BRILLIANT. GET IT? LIKE A STAR? I'll go back to the idiot corner now...

[StarInaBox]

D: Aw no get out of that you don't need to be there.

[Freeshooter92]

BUT THERE'S COOKIES HERE.

[MULTI_MEDIA_MAN]

Freeshooter92 said
BUT THERE'S COOKIES HERE.

Let me get my amputee soldier from another RP I'm in. He's currently high as balls waiting for the "Cookie fairy" (another PC) to give him a cup for his milk.

[Vincanity]

New Idea for ya:
"
Fighter (Axe)
> Warrior (Axe & Bow) [A hunter and trapper, this seasoned fighter can take down a squad of pikeman and still bring home a deer to feed his family. Great terrain movement]
> Hero (Sword & Axes) [Balanced fighters. Strong and quick with the ability to fight close and distance enemies]
> Marauder (Axe & Dark)[A troubling Axe wielder made for striking first. Terrible aim and defense, but is able to attack two enemies simultaneously with great power]"

So no more axe knight and now you have a galeforced axe user.

As for the Grandmaster setup, I made it like that because it is more viable, IMO at least, that a Grandmaster would be more likely to switch to, say, a random class with a completely different style/weapons because the Grandmaster has a good understanding. Where most of use would have to stay in our range of expertise. A Swordmaster isn't very likely to become a Valkyrie.

[Freeshooter92]

-Post removed for pointless anger-

[MULTI_MEDIA_MAN]

Vincanity said
New Idea for ya:
"Fighter (Axe)
> Warrior (Axe & Bow) [A hunter and trapper, this seasoned fighter can take down a squad of pikeman and still bring home a deer to feed his family. Great terrain movement]
> Hero (Sword & Axes) [Balanced fighters. Strong and quick with the ability to fight close and distance enemies]
> Marauder (Axe & Dark)[A troubling Axe wielder made for striking first. Terrible aim and defense, but is able to attack two enemies simultaneously with great power]"

So no more axe knight and now you have a galeforced axe user.

As for the Grandmaster setup, I made it like that because it is more viable, IMO at least, that a Grandmaster would be more likely to switch to, say, a random class with a completely different style/weapons because the Grandmaster has a good understanding. Where most of use would have to stay in our range of expertise. A Swordmaster isn't very likely to become a Valkyrie.

Awesome and awesome. And now I get it. Basically, they can SWITCH classes to any other class.

[Double]

Okay but... they must retain some of their Tactician swag in the transition, right?

[Freeshooter92]

Please tell me I can have a lord learn magic?

[MULTI_MEDIA_MAN]

Double said
So then, my presumption about gaining a Mount or a new Weapon class was correct?

Kinda. It comes at the cost of swords and magic, though, unless the new class has some of the old weapons. It's basically a straight-up class change a la Awakening.

[Double]

Okay, but the Tactician aspect has to be retained somehow I imagine, yes? In such a case, then I would kind of like Kristoph to have wandered into the Dark Knight class. I mean, a Mounted Unit capable of attacking both physically AND magically? Yes please!