<Snipped quote by Host>
Did you not catch how I specified my reasoning. He's a regular human, which are incredibly predictable. You're also ignoring the time frame again, actually, you're just ignoring it constantly, and the very likely part about Dark either being able to spy on him and/or steal knowledge from anyone working for him he came across.
It's 100% probability. Monkeys and typewriters will eventually write the works of Shakespeare, countless Darks with countless time will have already done 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of all the things Dynamo will ever do.
Your analogy is immeadiately wrong with that because it's not that you're hitting me with a rock, it's that you're hiding behind a boulder when a nuke hits. And it's still void because I've never been arguing a tech difference aside from for the specifics of why David's thing couldn't have come about anyway, I've been arguing that Dark would already know how it's made, how it works, countless ways to improve it, and countless ways to get past it, which he would have prepared for and armed Mio with.
The thing is that Dark's done enough to be able to let the rock hit him and have it hit where he wants, so that it shatters upon contact with him. If we're going to do the tech side of why this isn't logically possible, you're basically saying that a fist sized rock blocked a nuke, destroyed the plane that carried it, blocked an antimatter explosion, survived a neutron star being dropped on it, and then hit someone on the other side of the milky way all at the same time. It's like saying that you're pouring water in a bowl and that the water caused all of the quantum particles to behave in the exact way that it takes to turn the bowl into a cat, when all you actually did is carry a dog into a room and spill root beer. It doesn't work. The analogy doesn't work either, but I'm bored and need something to keep from blehing.
You claim that I'm "ignoring" when that's exactly what you're doing.
Cliche and somewhat disputed example. Stop trying to make Dark an MR god, because he's not. Get over yourself because neither you nor your writing is perfect.
Don't give me an analogy that doesn't work. Your only argument is "he's Dark, so he must have been able to beat what you're doing (despite me not knowing what it is). I'm not making a technology argument, I'm making an argument that you just can't stop it the way you're going about it. Accept that and move on.
