14 Guests viewing this page
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by souleaterfan320
Raw
Avatar of souleaterfan320

souleaterfan320 Abel: Grand Warrior of Old

Member Seen 6 hrs ago

I'm glad im not the only one who is busy XD
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Techspert
Raw
Avatar of Techspert

Techspert Star

Member Seen 18 days ago

I'm glad im not the only one who is busy XD


Really? I'd feel the opposite.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Mammalia
Raw
Avatar of Mammalia

Mammalia Ruby Jean Fitz

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

I have a cold, so I'm going to attempt to take a nap. sorryyyyyy
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Techspert
Raw
Avatar of Techspert

Techspert Star

Member Seen 18 days ago

I have a cold, so I'm going to attempt to take a nap. sorryyyyyy


Get well soon.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by DarkwolfX37
Raw
GM
Avatar of DarkwolfX37

DarkwolfX37 Absolute L User

Member Seen 17 days ago

<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

If God did tell someone what to write, then there is no reason to believe there are errors. If God is all powerful and all knowing, then there is even less, because he would know how to set up the variables correctly to achieve the results he desired. If you want what Dark said

<Snipped quote by DarkwolfX37>

Here, he's incorrect. But it should be interpreted literally unless there is reason to believe otherwise.

<Snipped quote by DarkwolfX37>

To the first four, we're discussing the NT; the OT is essentially ubiquitously Hebrew. If you want to claim someone made up words, find an example. Burden of truth.

Historians care what the past was, including the documentation of alterations in literature. To use that example, it would be like you saying Harry Potter was originally a Thomas the Tank Engine fan fiction with no legitimate sources to back it up.

I say "primarily in Greek" because I don't know of any books that weren't written in Greek, but I'm not certain that there aren't any. But there literally is no translation issue.

The key is that it doesn't. I don't recall saying this, but it's a hypothetical that means literally nothing. The Bible is either a book of truth or a book of lies, and a hypothetical like that entirely undermines the premise of the debate, making it invalid. You have no sources to back up your argument and I have a plethora peer reviewed documents that I've linked several times.

I wrote this as I went and don't feel like putting all of the effort to waste. Besides, it's a cheap tactic to end it after making all sorts of claims.


I have an example but it's not going to matter to you because I don't know the source the person I heard it from used.

And there are plenty of historians that agree that there were several translation errors. But that's not the forefront of what they do. They're more interested in fucking events that happened, not whether or not the stuff was translated correctly.

Yes it does. There are tons of verses that all say "the earth is flat" but you choose them as verses that aren't supposed to be literal because if you took them as literal the way you're supposed to, you'd have to reject all scientific knowledge so far, and you don't want to do that.

And no, it's not black and white. It can be a book with truth and lies in it. There are all sorts of books like that. Look at islam, it's got tons of true shit in it and tons of lies in it. The bible isn't any different.

I probably took a screenshot but it was years ago, back around the time of the nye ham debate. "Almost photographic memory."

Well one of us is going to do it and I'm more stubborn than you. Again, we know how this ends, we know this goes on forever, and we know we're both stubborn enough to keep going so long that we veer off into completely unrelated topics and argue for days or weeks over what could eventually turn into fucking plant science or something else equally unrelated, and we've been really good about not dominating the OOC with long pointless arguments, so
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 12 days ago

Mom: You know people have been playing that Pokémon Go and pulling into people's driveways and stuff to catch those Pokémen.
Brother: It's Pokémon.
Mom: What?
Brother: Pokémon.
Mom: What did I say?
Dad: Pokéchus.
Me: Get me out of this car.
1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Techspert
Raw
Avatar of Techspert

Techspert Star

Member Seen 18 days ago

Mom: You know people have been playing that Pokémon Go and pulling into people's driveways and stuff to catch those Pokémen.
Brother: It's Pokémon.
Mom: What?
Brother: Pokémon.
Mom: What did I say?
Dad: Pokéchus.
Me: Get me out of this car.


I don't get it.

@DarkwolfX37

I beg to differ.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Heroic
Raw
Avatar of Heroic

Heroic Zoey

Member Seen 2 mos ago

<Snipped quote by Galaxy Raider>

I don't get it.

@DarkwolfX37

I beg to differ.


Everyone saying it wrong.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Techspert
Raw
Avatar of Techspert

Techspert Star

Member Seen 18 days ago

<Snipped quote by Techspert>

Everyone saying it wrong.


Ah, got it. Pokerman is pretty easy to say, though.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Heroic
Raw
Avatar of Heroic

Heroic Zoey

Member Seen 2 mos ago

<Snipped quote by Heroic>

Ah, got it. Pokerman is pretty easy to say, though.


Don't think I've ever heard that one.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Techspert
Raw
Avatar of Techspert

Techspert Star

Member Seen 18 days ago

<Snipped quote by Techspert>

Don't think I've ever heard that one.


Really? Must be regional.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Heroic
Raw
Avatar of Heroic

Heroic Zoey

Member Seen 2 mos ago

<Snipped quote by Heroic>

Really? Must be regional.


Eenteresting.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Techspert
Raw
Avatar of Techspert

Techspert Star

Member Seen 18 days ago

<Snipped quote by Techspert>

Eenteresting.


Yeah. But anywho.
Hidden 8 yrs ago 8 yrs ago Post by Darlit Glitch
Raw
Avatar of Darlit Glitch

Darlit Glitch Nix (human form)

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Mammalia
Raw
Avatar of Mammalia

Mammalia Ruby Jean Fitz

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Darlit Glitch
Raw
Avatar of Darlit Glitch

Darlit Glitch Nix (human form)

Member Seen 3 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by Darlit Glitch>

Perfect timing. I have just returned.


Yay.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 12 days ago

A perceptive question gets a penalty but a question for spoilers gets nothing?
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Efficacy
Raw
Avatar of Efficacy

Efficacy Bryson

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

A perceptive question gets a penalty but a question for spoilers gets nothing?


Uh, that was a bonus.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 12 days ago

<Snipped quote by Galaxy Raider>

Uh, that was a bonus.


I didn't understand. It said minus.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Galaxy Raider
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Galaxy Raider

Galaxy Raider Kat

Member Seen 12 days ago

<Snipped quote by Efficacy>

I didn't understand. It said minus.


Or deducting, rather. Sounded like a penalty the way it was worded.
↑ Top
14 Guests viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet