<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>
Can you reduce that statement a bit to clarify?
Havent seen a post from anyone since I took a break for work and yardwork. Youve even resorted to posting to yourself.
<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>
Can you reduce that statement a bit to clarify?
<Snipped quote by Webmaster>
Havent seen a post from anyone since I took a break for work and yardwork. Youve even resorted to posting to yourself.
<Snipped quote by souleaterfan320>
I figure that people are working on end of term stuff. I am too, but I get on intermittently. I think it'll get better when summer hits.
Hey Sven. Things looking up at all?
<Snipped quote by Host>
I'd wager yes only because it's a week until I get to go home, at least.
<Snipped quote by Multifarious>
I get that feeling. Ready to be done with this garbage of a semester?
<Snipped quote by Host>
I'm ready for the easy days.
Danny Phantom should get a mature reboot/continuation like Samurai Jack did. It could work so well.
<Snipped quote by DarkwolfX37>
You keep referencing the "Infinty Problem" without explaining exactly what it is. It isn't known in spacetime theory, at least not by that name.
Still, an infinity Existence becomes problematic because it would require infinite matter and energy, which would also make it boundless. That brings up another set of issues, and there's no real reason to consider it infinite. A finite Existence fits into calculations much better without a lot of the issues an infinite land brings up.
The problem with 25% = 50% is rationalized by the idea that a quarter of endless is endless and half of endless is still endless, so if there are two enldlesses that fit into one endless space, one half of them must be one and one half the other. However, infinity is a set and not a value, and sets break simple algebra. If every fourth element of the set is 3 and the rest are 2, no matter how far along the set you go, the ratio will remain 3:1. It doesn't become 1:1 at any point just because it is infinite; they remain in a ratio regardless of the size of the set.
Numbers are a pure concept; that's why they make most scenarios totally impossible. I understand that you're saying it's totally restructured, but even in a restructure, it must follow certain mathematical principles to avoid collapse. Virtually every scenario beyond ours leads to total destruction, with few exceptions.
Parallel Source dimensions can be explained the same way differing Source dimensions can. The Nobility System did have a filter; most of the time, filters are passive rather than actively created and enforced by the System owners.
He could, but it's also really really hard to determine all of the balls that are spinning the wrong direction, especially when mixed in with other ones that aren't. The idea isn't that Ma'at can't differentiate them, but it's intended to use up all of her concentration, just like it would for the shipper, trying to notice all of the balls moving in the wrong direction. It would also be super easy to end up confusing the two directions when seeing them side by side enough, regardless of how well they know them.
nestofthought.tumblr.com/post/16018604..
I'm so glad that "'" doesn't work in urls.
battleforthenet.com
<Snipped quote by DarkwolfX37>
I'd rather the ISP free market be restored by breaking up the monopolies. They got the power they have by lobbying and forcing the government to stick their hand in the internet, and I'd much rather the internet become open without any government influence. We got to this point because of government intervention and while net neutrality is the ultimate goal, I don't think the answer to government influence is more government influence.