[OOC] Myriad Reality

[whizzball1]

Dynamics said
I figured that complete was implied. Just because I don't specify every last detail doesn't mean I don't mean every last detail.

Sometimes I can see implied things, sometimes I fail miserably at doing so xD

[Dynamics]

whizzball1 said
Sometimes I can see implied things, sometimes I fail miserably at doing so xD

But never deny the fact of Go. Best sentence.

[whizzball1]

Dynamics said
But never deny the fact of Go. Best sentence.

Yesssss

[Dynamics]

whizzball1 said
Yesssss

What if someone said nothing but "yes," "no," or "go?"

[whizzball1]

Dynamics said
What if someone said nothing but "yes," "no," or "go?"

Yes and no are only correct with context, so unless he was always being asked questions, that would be ungrammatical. Or he could just say go XD That would be insane.

[Dynamics]

whizzball1 said
Yes and no are only correct with context, so unless he was always being asked questions, that would be ungrammatical. Or he could just say go XD That would be insane.

I never said he was anything else XD

[whizzball1]

Dynamics said
I never said he was anything else XD

Haha, yeah.

[whizzball1]

whizzball1 said
There could end up being three ways. *giggles*

You never answered meeee

[Dynamics]

whizzball1 said
You never answered meeee

Did I not?

[Multifarious]

Dynamics said
Never done. Unless it was another name.

Oxidation-Reduction reactions.

[Host]

Multifarious said
Oxidation-Reduction reactions.

Wasn't on our curriculum.

[Multifarious]

Host said
Wasn't on our curriculum.

What the heck, man. It's one of the three thped of reactions involving ions: Redox, precipitation, and Acid-Base reactions. I don't understand how it isn't.

[whizzball1]

Dynamics said
Did I not?

Nope

[whizzball1]

Multifarious said
Oxidation-Reduction reactions.

What do youuuu think about pro-sentences

[Host]

Multifarious said
What the heck, man. It's one of the three thped of reactions involving ions: Redox, precipitation, and Acid-Base reactions. I don't understand how it isn't.

Unless our terminology is way off from each other, we didn't because of that whole Tx vs Wv thing that you're ignoring. What was the process involved?

whizzball1 said
Nope

Yeah I did.

[Multifarious]

whizzball1 said
What do youuuu think about pro-sentences

They're eh. But I am not getting into the technicalities and intricacies of English.

Host said
Unless our terminology is way off from each other, we didn't because of that whole Tx vs Wv thing that you're ignoring. What was the process involved?Yeah I did.

But Chem is Chem, and you'd think with something that basic...

And the process involved in calculating it is what we call "Half reactions". Need more explanation?

[Host]

Multifarious said
They're eh. But I am not getting into the technicalities and intricacies of English.But Chem is Chem, and you'd think with something that basic...And the process involved in calculating it is what we call "Half reactions". Need more explanation?

Basic by your standards.

Yes.

[Multifarious]

Host said
Basic by your standards.Yes.

This is the first thing that popped up, and it's not a bad explanation by any means.

[Host]

Multifarious said

Uh, this is just sounding like the superscript charge. Aka: Valence electrons needed to be gained/loss to achieve an octet (or duet in the case of hydrogen) shell.

[whizzball1]

Multifarious said
They're eh. But I am not getting into the technicalities and intricacies of English.But Chem is Chem, and you'd think with something that basic...And the process involved in calculating it is what we call "Half reactions". Need more explanation?

I wouldn't think you would. =P