49 Guests viewing this page
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

Host said
Uh, this is just sounding like the superscript charge. Aka: Valence electrons needed to be gained/loss to achieve an octet (or duet in the case of hydrogen) shell.


Not really that. It's basically when you have a reaction where charge is just altered in general, and you have to balance both the number of atoms and the charge on both sides.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Host
Raw
Avatar of Host

Host Noir

Member Seen 8 days ago

THESE ARE LITERALLY JUST IONIC BONDS
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Host
Raw
Avatar of Host

Host Noir

Member Seen 8 days ago

Multifarious said
Not really that. It's basically when you have a reaction where charge is just altered in general, and you have to balance both the number of atoms and the charge on both sides.


IONIC BONDS. YOURE SPEAKING OF IONIC BONDS.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

whizzball1 said
I wouldn't think you would. =P


I hate it so much.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

Host said
IONIC BONDS. YOURE SPEAKING OF IONIC BONDS.


That's the type of bond, but the reaction I'm talking about is a redox reaction. Single replacement, double replacment.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Host
Raw
Avatar of Host

Host Noir

Member Seen 8 days ago

Multifarious said
That's the type of bond, but the reaction I'm talking about is a redox reaction. Single replacement, double replacment.


YOU COULDVE JUST SAID THAT.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

Host said
YOU COULDVE JUST SAID THAT.


Like I knew what would trigger that in your head.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Host
Raw
Avatar of Host

Host Noir

Member Seen 8 days ago

Multifarious said
Like I knew what would trigger that in your head.


BUT WE DIDNT CALL IT THAT
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by whizzball1
Raw
Avatar of whizzball1

whizzball1 Spirit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Multifarious said
I hate it so much.


I absolutely love dealing with all the intricacies of English grammar. Not many others do, though, it can be really infuriating. Bleh.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Host
Raw
Avatar of Host

Host Noir

Member Seen 8 days ago

whizzball1 said
I absolutely love dealing with all the intricacies of English grammar. Not many others do, though, it can be really infuriating. Bleh.


I like it.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

whizzball1 said
I absolutely love dealing with all the intricacies of English grammar. Not many others do, though, it can be really infuriating. Bleh.


Host said
I like it.


You're both weirdos.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Host
Raw
Avatar of Host

Host Noir

Member Seen 8 days ago

Multifarious said
You're both weirdos.


But grammar is beautiful.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Spiritblitz
Raw
Avatar of Spiritblitz

Spiritblitz Eclipse

Member Seen 23 days ago

Host said
But grammar is beautiful.


English never agrees with me. And when it does, it's at times when it is useless.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Host
Raw
Avatar of Host

Host Noir

Member Seen 8 days ago

Spiritblitz said
English never agrees with me. And when it does, it's at times when it is useless.


What about Spanish?
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

Host said
But grammar is beautiful.


Decent grammar is good, but to treat the English language like it's a science is incredibly dull and boring.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Dynamics
Raw
Avatar of Dynamics

Dynamics Magic Steve

Member Seen 8 days ago

Multifarious said
Decent grammar is good, but to treat the Wnglish language like it's a science is incredibly dull and boring.


As a scientist, I disagree.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

Dynamics said
As a scientist, I disagree.


A scientist doesn't have to enjoy every branch of science out there.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Dynamics
Raw
Avatar of Dynamics

Dynamics Magic Steve

Member Seen 8 days ago

Multifarious said
A scientist doesn't have to enjoy every branch of science out there.


Says you.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by whizzball1
Raw
Avatar of whizzball1

whizzball1 Spirit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Host said
I like it.


:D
Multifarious said
You're both weirdos.


:D
Multifarious said
Decent grammar is good, but to treat the English language like it's a science is incredibly dull and boring.


I'm a scientist. Treating English as a science works perfectly fine for me. =P Although opinions are subjective so it's silly to argue about them.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Multifarious
Raw
Avatar of Multifarious

Multifarious Rea

Member Seen 24 days ago

Dynamics said
Says you.


They can, but they don't have to. I'm one who particularly doesn't like Biology, and is indifferent when it cones to Meteorology.
↑ Top
49 Guests viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet