2 Guests viewing this page
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Willy Vereb
Raw
Avatar of Willy Vereb

Willy Vereb The Wordy Engineer

Member Seen 3 days ago

@Monochromatic RainbowIf you mean Rods of God kind of mechanism, such satellite systems are actually ridiculously easy to intercept. Both the projectile and just destroying the satellite before it reaches them.
With all the upgrades in energy and the fact propulsion systems run on that I think nukes are going to get fairly frequent use for anything but bombing cities (since that's horrible and banned).
A stray nuclear missile hitting your satellite would destroy it long before it gets into position.
Rods of God are cheap only when the enemy aren't ready to blow the fuck out of your weapon systems.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Antediluvixen
Raw
Avatar of Antediluvixen

Antediluvixen Kemonomimi Dystopia Creator

Member Seen 7 mos ago

@Willy Vereb Who says it's just a satellite?

I was actually thinking railguns in spaaaaaaaaaaaaace, and systems to intercept those missiles. A satellite can be destroyed, so can a missile.
Hidden 9 yrs ago 9 yrs ago Post by Unfortunately
Raw
GM
Avatar of Unfortunately

Unfortunately smug

Member Seen 8 yrs ago

Well, kinetic bombardment would be obviously a weapon of mass destruction and as such will be banned in war. So unless you're a real scum you aren't meant to use that.


Y'all real scums so we can use them

No international law governs the world now because the UN is dead. Only thing keeping people from weaponizing asteroids is that they'll fuck themselves over too. Rods are less apocalyptic so that's more usable.

If you mean Rods of God kind of mechanism, such satellite systems are actually ridiculously easy to intercept. Both the projectile and just destroying the satellite before it reaches them.

Defense systems mofo

Also you could place a god rod launcher farther out in space and missiles will have a hard time taking them out. Even though it requires a few more calculations and some waiting to put the projectile in the right track, it's worth the move.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Antediluvixen
Raw
Avatar of Antediluvixen

Antediluvixen Kemonomimi Dystopia Creator

Member Seen 7 mos ago

@Unfortunately WMD's are a go?

Fuck yeah.

Fear my telephone poles of doom, bitches.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by End Here
Raw
Avatar of End Here

End Here I am a human, not a toaster.

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Is this open?
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Antediluvixen
Raw
Avatar of Antediluvixen

Antediluvixen Kemonomimi Dystopia Creator

Member Seen 7 mos ago

@End Here Should be.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Unfortunately
Raw
GM
Avatar of Unfortunately

Unfortunately smug

Member Seen 8 yrs ago

Already declared running but none still has a nation up yet. Oops.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Willy Vereb
Raw
Avatar of Willy Vereb

Willy Vereb The Wordy Engineer

Member Seen 3 days ago

Um, pure fusion nukes are far less polluting than kinetic bombardment.
Pure fusion doesn't spread radioactive material everywhere. There's just a radiation burst, shockwave and that's it.
Meanwhile your Rods of God would spread metric tons of vaporized heavy metal particles into the air which is a recognized health hazard. Maybe not as bad as old nukes but that's subjective here.
Having higher mass than the nuke also mean it'd be more expensive to ship up to space and it'd spew up orders of magnitudes greater amount of dust with all its negative effects.
Kunetic bombardment also has less AoE albeit much better penetration so they are better against underground shelters.

On the other hand the idea of releasing the rods from further away only makes them far easier to intercept because due to the weaker gravity it'd take exponentially more time to reach the target. Also since rods of god are unguided they require crazy precise positioning and even then they would be less accurate than guided weapons. Worse your location basically telegraphs them whwre are you intending to shoot these.
Kinetic bombardment are the poor man's nuke and you can be sure that they'd be handled by prepared militaries as if they were cheap chinese toys.
Kinetic bombardment would only work if you secured the space for it. Without space superiority they won't be any more than a distraction.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Unfortunately
Raw
GM
Avatar of Unfortunately

Unfortunately smug

Member Seen 8 yrs ago

Bruh

Dust ain't radioactive

Sure health hazard but it's not going to make the place uninhabitable for a millenium

Pure fusion nukes still deliver cancer-inducing radiation

Kinetic bombardment is also propelled by electromagnetic mechanisms, which means it's going to be still powerful to deliver a devastating shockwave with all the kinetic energy it's carrying and is difficult to hit with their immense speed. In addition, that's why I said "more calculations" concering precision. I'm also talking not too far that the Earth is just the size of a penny compared to your hand 1 foot away, just far enough that most missiles will have a hard time intercepting them and you'll need spaceships to take the satellite down.

And since this is science fiction anyway, some things would be more or less in greater measure than in what's true to the real world.

As said:
4. Be realistic. Not too much, but keep it close.

We're trying to keep many things real to keep things balanced and in depth, but we're not going to let overrealism ruin the fun stuff here.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Willy Vereb
Raw
Avatar of Willy Vereb

Willy Vereb The Wordy Engineer

Member Seen 3 days ago

@UnfortunatelySay that to the Dinosaurs.
Dust clouds high in the atmosphere can lead to environmrntal catastrophes including but not exclusive to mini iccice ages.
Also dust powder in your lungs is a very serious healh issue, just ask people who know about volcanic catastrophes.
Heavy metal particles are even worse and nah, they would contaminate the landscape for long and you won't be happy for it. Check reports on the Gulf War's efects.
BTW, people are alreafy living in Hiroshima and and Chernobyl. You confuse radioactive materials with viruses and neurotoxins. Thing is dangerous but its effects are more subtle than some super lethal zone which you can't approach without dying.

Lastly, point your hair drier and laser pen at yourself, just for a minute. If you caugut cancer I am so sorry and I pay your treatment. If not then that's exactly what you can expect with pure nukes. Sure, unlucky dudes caught in the close proximity of the detination may suffer fromadiation poisoning but that's like saying frag grenades are contaminating because a stray sharpnel can wound people. Pure fusion nukes aren't exactly Disney Land and there coule complications wr didn't considered before but from what we know they are sure as hell more eco friendly than meteor impacts and kinetif bombardment.

As for launching kinetic rods via railgun mechanism. It may help but it defeats the whole point on them being cheap. The system would still cheaper per shot than a nuke but you're getting dimnishing returns. That abd you can only get so far by accelerating a multi-ton projectile. Try how crazy amount it needs by just inputing the KE formula of E= 0.5m*v^2
That and even if it's fast it ravels in a straight line for entire hours. More tnough time to predict its course and shoot it down.

I don't wish to turn this game into a number crunching science fair. I am merely giving you the correct answers.
Hidden 9 yrs ago 9 yrs ago Post by End Here
Raw
Avatar of End Here

End Here I am a human, not a toaster.

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Nation Name: United Australian Coalition
Flag:
Map Location:
Government Info: Constitutional Oligarchy














-----------------------------------------------------------
Done
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Willy Vereb
Raw
Avatar of Willy Vereb

Willy Vereb The Wordy Engineer

Member Seen 3 days ago

@UnfortunatelySay that to the Dinosaurs.
Dust clouds high in the atmosphere can lead to environmrntal catastrophes including but not exclusive to mini iccice ages.
Also dust powder in your lungs is a very serious healh issue, just ask people who know about volcanic catastrophes.
Heavy metal particles are even worse and nah, they would contaminate the landscape for long and you won't be happy for it. Check reports on the Gulf War's efects.
BTW, people are alreafy living in Hiroshima and and Chernobyl. You confuse radioactive materials with viruses and neurotoxins. Thing is dangerous but its effects are more subtle than some super lethal zone which you can't approach without dying.

Lastly, point your hair drier and laser pen at yourself, just for a minute. If you caugut cancer I am so sorry and I pay your treatment. If not then that's exactly what you can expect with pure nukes. Sure, unlucky dudes caught in the close proximity of the detination may suffer fromadiation poisoning but that's like saying frag grenades are contaminating because a stray sharpnel can wound people. Pure fusion nukes aren't exactly Disney Land and there coule complications wr didn't considered before but from what we know they are sure as hell more eco friendly than meteor impacts and kinetif bombardment.

As for launching kinetic rods via railgun mechanism. It may help but it defeats the whole point on them being cheap. The system would still cheaper per shot than a nuke but you're getting dimnishing returns. That abd you can only get so far by accelerating a multi-ton projectile. Try how crazy amount it needs by just inputing the KE formula of E= 0.5m*v^2
That and even if it's fast it ravels in a straight line for entire hours. More tnough time to predict its course and shoot it down.

I don't wish to turn this game into a number crunching science fair. I am merely giving you the correct answers.
I wrote this on the mobile phone so excuse me for the mess of typos. Anyways, like I said don't take this to heart and I agree that while realism is good we shouldn't get overboard with it.
I just answered to your argument with my own. If anything seems offensive, none intended.

Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Antediluvixen
Raw
Avatar of Antediluvixen

Antediluvixen Kemonomimi Dystopia Creator

Member Seen 7 mos ago

@Willy Vereb You actually make excellent points, and I will concede that you know more about this than I, and I haven't put a lot of thought into this, which I intend to rectify. So if my plan is Swiss cheese, I'm not surprised.

I am however, reluctant to use nukes because of their connotations, and wonder what you could suggest as an alternative to an easily interceptable weapon like a "Rod from God" and a weapon like a fusion warhead (and I am aware of fusion's lack of fallout) with the connotations it carries.

I was actually thinking spaceship batteries, but again, I haven't been able to put too much thought into military matters.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Willy Vereb
Raw
Avatar of Willy Vereb

Willy Vereb The Wordy Engineer

Member Seen 3 days ago

@Willy Vereb You actually make excellent points, and I will concede that you know more about this than I, and I haven't put a lot of thought into this, which I intend to rectify. So if my plan is Swiss cheese, I'm not surprised.

I am however, reluctant to use nukes because of their connotations, and wonder what you could suggest as an alternative to an easily interceptable weapon like a "Rod from God" and a weapon like a fusion warhead (and I am aware of fusion's lack of fallout) with the connotations it carries.

I was actually thinking spaceship batteries, but again, I haven't been able to put too much thought into military matters.
I think at roughly equivalent level of energy everything looks like a nuke, so the connotations would be there.


On the other hand who needs weapons of mass destruction to begin with?
Their power is mostly just a waste and they are mostly good for terror.
Although well if you do need a weapon for terestrial bombardment then I do suggest kinetic bombs. That is nothing but dropping random mass from space. Or if precision is required use smaller munitions but en-masse.
Good'ol missiles can also help but most of the time their explosive content would be an unneded surplus for terestrial bombardment. Gravity would accelerate the misile to such speed its own KE would be greater than the energy of its explosive.
They say anything at 3km/s carries its own mass in TNT explosive power.
Alternatively if you have a Type IB ship (big-ass fusion reactor thus sufficient energy output) you may try to snipe down to the surface via lasers and particle weapons. Whichever makes you feel better.
You can empty gigajoules of energy with ease which is kind of equal to dropping a 1000lbs bomb.

Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Antediluvixen
Raw
Avatar of Antediluvixen

Antediluvixen Kemonomimi Dystopia Creator

Member Seen 7 mos ago

Although well if you do need a weapon for terestrial bombardment then I do suggest kinetic bombs. That is nothing but dropping random mass from space. Or if precision is required use smaller munitions but en-masse.


That's actually what I was planning basically, when I said kinetic bombardment I didn't mean WMDs and such, basically just the en masse bombardment, like naval arillery but in spaaaaaaaace.

As to the ships, the Confederation does have those, and in fact most of their military power is space based, though there's a tendency to favor kinetic energy weapons over directed energy, though they certainly do have many of the railguns that'll launch plasma projectiles.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Willy Vereb
Raw
Avatar of Willy Vereb

Willy Vereb The Wordy Engineer

Member Seen 3 days ago

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

That's actually what I was planning basically, when I said kinetic bombardment I didn't mean WMDs and such, basically just the en masse bombardment, like naval arillery but in spaaaaaaaace.

As to the ships, the Confederation does have those, and in fact most of their military power is space based, though there's a tendency to favor kinetic energy weapons over directed energy, though they certainly do have many of the railguns that'll launch plasma projectiles.
Well, if you have a Type 1B kind of ship using its full reactor output for a railgun like mechanism then you can be sure that the end result would be a stream of plasma.
personally i have one such idea where a few terajoules of energy is released intantenously in a rail or coil gun system and the acceleration renders the few kilograms of tantalite into a thin stream of superheated plasma traveling at thousands of kilometers per second.


Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Antediluvixen
Raw
Avatar of Antediluvixen

Antediluvixen Kemonomimi Dystopia Creator

Member Seen 7 mos ago

@Willy Vereb Not full output, and several railguns, so not full plasma.

I'll be on my computer in a bit, would you like to talk about this in more depth then?
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Willy Vereb
Raw
Avatar of Willy Vereb

Willy Vereb The Wordy Engineer

Member Seen 3 days ago

@Monochromatic RainbowI am busy with 3 other RPs for now so nah.
you'll see my approach to the tech when I update my NS.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Antediluvixen
Raw
Avatar of Antediluvixen

Antediluvixen Kemonomimi Dystopia Creator

Member Seen 7 mos ago

@Willy Vereb Fair enough.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by End Here
Raw
Avatar of End Here

End Here I am a human, not a toaster.

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Who accepts the nations?
↑ Top
2 Guests viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet