<Snipped quote by Audacious>
Not currently, no. Are you opposed to it?
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
I suppose we'll see.
I have about a million thoughts running around right now.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
Not currently, no. Are you opposed to it?
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
I suppose we'll see.
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Perhaps, but knowledge of capabilities and actioned abuse are worlds apart.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
My point. If you wish to live by a moral code, live by that moral code. If you wish to live by structure, join or create said structure. If you wish to reject all of this, you're free to do so, and you can adopt any contradiction, thought, or creed in its place. However, none of it will be assigned for you. No structure, by justice or otherwise, and no tenets, true or false. You must take those up yourself.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
*Nods*
I agree completely. But similarly, countless others die while you, so far, have not. Does that forfeit your right to live, as much as any "right" can exist?
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
You have as much a right to it as anybody else.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
Whatever you decide is in your best interest, I would assume. Broader Existence is an anarchy, and we can but do what we desire.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
And you’re able to enforce that feeling if you so choose. You certainly have that ability.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
And who would stop whomever is given that power, should they choose to abuse it? “Who watches the watchers” is an unsolved problem.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
Ought they? Accountability necessitates a social hierarchy.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
With all due respect, the suggestion amounts to detaining a man in a quasi-legal system to evaluate his actions and deliver a corresponding punishment. To what end?