Avatar of HachiRoku

Status

Recent Statuses

4 mos ago
Current "Back after two years", I said three years ago. Five years, then! What's up?
2 likes
3 yrs ago
Back after two years... what's new?
2 likes

Bio

here to write some posts and kick some ass

and I'm all out of posts

Most Recent Posts

To be honest, this is an interesting concept that I like.

Question, though: what kind of universe is it?
<Snipped quote by HachiRoku>

I think what we're finding is that "Conservative = Republican" and "Liberal = Democrat" has been a fraud and the conservatives (and liberals) are done with it. Republicans did not want Trump; Trump spanked them. Democrats did not want Bernie (so they rigged the primary and bought him off); the establishment is losing its control though.

It's easy to overplay the significance while we're in the moment though. Ocasio-Cortez could be a ripple. Trump could be a ripple. Will any of it (beyond the SCOTUS picks) last? Is there still an establishment (on either side of the aisle) in six years? That's what I wanna know. Hopefully the answer is "no, and term limits in Congress will prevent another one from rising ever again." But that's awfully optimistic.


In my best case scenario the 'media outsiders' like Philip DeFranco, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, etc. get some foothold/political capital, but we all know that's a long shot. When considering something a bit more practical, I just want them to overtake the TV media in influence. It's sickening to see them become establishment ideologues, and profiting off of controversy/tragedy. The reason they're like that in the first place is a result of their environment. The only way they can ever get views or ratings is by capitalizing off some sort of "crazy event", be it a shooting or Trump 'scandal'. Of course, this is only a negatively repetitive cycle, so my only hope is that the spiral hits a bottom.

Regarding Congress/SCOTUS, I would kill to see the end of two things: polarization and establishment. If we could use term limits or some other means to get the corrupt establishment out on both sides and free up the media, maybe then people will learn to view things objectively rather than from one side of the spectrum.
<Snipped quote by HachiRoku>

At some point we decided words can change in meaning and usage, which is fair... to an extent. To my mind, the concept of conservatism being authoritarian is structurally unsound historically. Conservatism is based in small government and the individual rights of man, which is the ideological opposite of authoritarianism. Libertarianism (as it stands today), arguably, is the true original form of conservatism which would also make it closest to the vision of the founding fathers. You're not alone in the irritation of shifting definitions. Liberal no longer means what it was meant to mean anymore, and the same could be said of conservatism. Both of these shifts are responsible by far left individuals outright changing what the parties stand for, and this goes for the Mitt Romney's, McCain's, and the Bush's who significantly expanded government power. I'd also add that Obama did the same thing: see the NDAA.

This is why I'm particularly glad that Trump is in office, we can now see who is ACTUALLY conservative and who is not. And, he's also getting politicians to reveal how left of center they truly are.


Granted, the American conservative movement has always more or less been the Coolidge/Reagan/Ben Shapiro type. The point I was trying to make was that Democrats are synonymous to liberal, and that Republicans are synonymous to conservative. I do agree that American conservatism is based on values similar to those of the classical liberal movement as a whole, and it's interesting to see the honest shift Trump is making. While I don't agree with every facet of his policy, it really is interesting to see how he's led to the polarized left and right to expose themselves (although he isn't really bringing them together by any means). It's refreshing to see CNN criticize everything he says and FOX circlejerk everything he does, because at least you know to trust both equally low.

Your next line is, "is this a JoJo reference?!"
I hate to butt in, but the wording of 'conservative' and 'liberal'— rather, the way they've been misconstrued in American politics— is always something that ticked me off. On a traditional political scale, conservative means authoritarian and liberal means libertarian: i.e., conservative referring to traditional group-oriented politics, while liberal refers to progressive individualism. Oddly enough, in politics, it's noted that the scale got flipped 90 degrees, to which the authoritarian right is 'conservative' and the whole left is 'liberal', with no proper words left standing for the libertarian right.
<Snipped quote by Odin>

like I said it's hard to tell

Well, Poe's law. Without a blatant display of humor, it's impossible to parody an extreme view in a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.

Honestly I got into this from The Office S2E1 'The Dundies'
Welcome to the site!



SETTING

March 1998: the beginning of spring. Every spring in Japan, the ice melts, and the cherry blossoms bloom. To a small niche of car enthusiasts, who run dangerous night races down the mountain passes, it signals the beginning of racing season. These tōge racers, infamous for their suicidal speeds down poorly-lit, windy roads, are rife across Kanto, but the hotspot location is Mt. Hakone. Located in western Kanagawa, the beautiful, scenic mountain means much more to the street racers of Kanto, who come in from as far away as Tochigi to race and spectate. In fact, this is because as opposed to the typical singular route most mountains take up, Hakone has four iconic passes.

In the early 1990s, Hakone was dominated by the legendary Z Brothers; as the name may infer, two brothers who drove Nissan Z-cars. The elder brother, Ryuki Fujimoto, ran with a light, agile '82 280Z, and was an analytical expert who specifically mastered the Turnpike downhill. Noriyuki, his junior by 8 years, went with a more 'modern' Z32, and pushed his skills to the limit, tuning it up and dominating the Nanamagari hillclimb. However, after Ryuki retired from racing and Noriyuki moved away in the mid-90s, the street racing scene has seen a power vacuum of sorts. Several small teams have sprouted up, attempting (and failing) to shatter the Z Brothers' times, but none yet have been able to even mimic the success of a truly strong street racing team. Oh, that's probably where you come in. Or not, that's fine too.







CHARACTER/CAR SHEETS





RULES ON GAMEPLAY (TENTATIVE)

  • Play To Lose!
    We utilize the "Play-2-Lose" system:
    "Play To Lose" (Often referred to as P2L, or PTL), is the act of simply following the most logical and likely path in roleplay. It means taking into account your characters strengths and weaknesses, and being honest. P2L requires a lot of honesty, because a lot of the time, it can mean harm to your character. However, it is much more accountable and respectable than a "Play To Win" system. Note that this doesn't necessarily mean putting your own character at a strong disadvantage each time, but rather taking logical factors into account and giving your opponent the benefit of the doubt.
    Example - P2W
    Takumi full throttled with a huge rev kick, shoving his AE86's nose in front. Pulling ahead, the Trueno maximizes its advantage by sliding, preventing its opponent from overtaking in return.

    Example - P2L
    Ryosuke begun to countersteer, hoping to adjust his FC at an optimal angle. However, due to the stress his previous actions had taken on his tires, his RX-7 slid outward. Such an opportunity would allow the 86 behind him to make a move, if the driver was adept enough to pass by.
  • Realism
    In terms or the type of 'realism' we'd expect of the races, the honest answer is that players are given the liberty to err on the side of caution and fairness. In other words, make the most reasonable and fair judgement, taking P2L in account. Regarding characters, obviously there should be no godmodding, metagaming or powerplaying. That also means no overpowered Gary Stus or Mary Sues. Your characters could be the most skilled drivers in the RP, but they are far from invincible. Everyone has strengths and weaknesses, which means everyone has a fair chance in the field of battle. So please, play fair. Although there are more lenient rules in terms of tuning and modification, we do ask that you do your best to not overstep your boundaries and do things realistically impossible. Real life is not a complicated world to understand as we all live in it. Japan takes place on Earth, not in space, so anything you would have your character do in the RP must be plausibly bound by the laws of reality, so that means no Fujiwara Zone. This rule cannot be emphasized enough; be mindful of your character's equipment and capability. Unrealistic scenarios such as an AE85 effortlessly "turbo kicking" past, say, a Skyline GT-R on a straight line, or a DC2 Integra drifting through a hairpin cleanly at 200 km/h, are naturally frowned upon. Make sure your character's actions are coherent and logical.
  • Times
    Now that you know what to do for a race, maybe it's over. How well did they do? Seek no further.
    Yes, I know it's not the most accurate and realistic time source, but the most reliable and comprehensive time attack list I could find was the Initial D Arcade Stage 8 World Record Times*note. For lore purposes, i've made a list here.
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet