Avatar of Innue
  • Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: Innue
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 1478 (0.36 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. Innue 11 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

6 yrs ago
Current Re-released our creature capture thread: roleplayerguild.com/topics/…
8 yrs ago
Mostly Janna is best summoner name. Sadly, Project, that is mine.
8 yrs ago
FF12 Zodiac Age players - if you want to have the optimal party, PM me. Working on a spreadsheet to determine best party makeups and I will share it once done.
1 like
8 yrs ago
Too many things I want to write right now, which is resulting in 0 writing getting done. Yaaaaaay.
8 yrs ago
Pondering re-releasing my western fantasy thread. >.>
1 like

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

Definitely true, but Qiao would want to be prepared for situations where there aren't Pokemon lol, so may edit in a civilian appropriate weapon.
@NuttsnBolts

I think the opinion could have been better phrased because (it seem sufficient without the first line), to be frank, the only reason I commented was because of that post.
Finished the bio. I'm not sure what gear a bodyguard would have in this world, so I left that vague until I could get specifics. Also still need to find the pictures for those two.

Admittedly, the history was more of a struggle than I expected.
So the agreement seems to be just because the character interaction doesn't involve yours allows you to dismiss it as unimportant (as per the OP), but that also 'you must read all posts' (as per some of the immediately following comments) has certain conditions that I think have been well documented. I'm glad there has been some clarification and discussion from some of the earlier posts. Made an interesting read at least.

At least for the most part, 'you should read all posts on most threads and most posts on all threads' has held true.
However, it is not the same as being with a RP from the beginning and refusing to read posts which I think what the topic is more centrally about.


I think yes, for a new thread it is definitely an instance to be reading all of the posts. However, I think the question was broadly posed to all threads, unless I missed something in the OP.

---

I think @yoshua171 is right to stress the important of communication. If a player is interested, willing to communicate with a sufficient understanding of what is going on, and one one of my threads where I know they really don't need to be reading every post because of a large amount of filler, I'm going to work with them to get them involved.

This is the type of thing I'll judge on a thread by thread basis when I GM and ultimately it is just that - it is up to the GM. RP has very few hard set rules.
I'm rewriting history for mine, but am close to wrapping up.
I'm glad @Odin posted, as I think his insight is crucial to this discussion.

While I think in principle what @Inkarnate,@Lady Amalthea, and @NuttsnBolts said is probably applicable to most instances, I think that there are threads where it is far from necessary. I think Odin's example was a good one, and I think further extrapolating from there, roleplays with significant amount of unscripted combat are definitely an 'exception' to the 'rules'. Other categories could include threads that are run partially as games - I would have zero expectation, or requirement, of any of my players to read every other player's capture posts for when they went to hunt wild creatures in my Pokemon-esque RP. Especially true on thread types with expansive player bases where some characters may never interact and we have interactions that are done specifically for singular characters to occupy themselves while they wait for other things to move along elsewhere. The context in which certain posts happens is important.

Definitely probably a more of 'you probably should be reading all the posts on most threads, and most of the posts on all threads' (I'm sort of proud-ish of this line) versus some rigid you must do something in all instances.

Also, definitely not in agreement with telling people to stop roleplaying. Just saying.

EDIT: One more thing, I also think some of the instances where there is something called useful ignorance where true lack of knowledge can create a thoroughly enjoyable, organic (and gluten free), non-contrived interaction. I've had this happen arising from people missing posts where another character was defeated or acquired some powerful artifact (in a game) where it spawned some of the most interesting character conversations I've ever had.

Yes, there is a line where the ignorance is burdensome, but I've had very few instances where that has been a problem in a thread. That type of ignorance is obvious though because the ones that are in that category are generally apparent at the beginning because they also don't tend to read the introduction...
Table o' contents coming soon.
© 2007-2025
BBCode Cheatsheet