Fuckers!
Plot twist: her first act as President is to colonize Britain. Payback's a bitch.
mdk Member
3/4
- Last Seen: 6 yrs ago
- Old Guild Username: mbl
- Joined: 11 yrs ago
- Posts: 3648 (0.92 / day)
- VMs: 0
-
Username history
- mdk 11 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
Terminal,
AlteredTundra,
Little Bill
Status
Recent Statuses
9 yrs ago
new leg today. I AM TERMINATOR REBORN
3
likes
Bio
User has no bio, yet
Most Recent Posts
Plot twist: her first act as President is to colonize Britain. Payback's a bitch.
@POOHEAD189 Mdk was waving the flag for women's rights when the Weinstien Story broke, where is he now with the Roy Moore story?
Florida. Visiting my old-ass granddad before he croaks and not spending time with you fucks.
Though it's interesting to me that you picked Roy Moore (who has an argument, I guess? Idunno) over Charlie Rose, Al Franken, Joe Biden, Conyers, et al. Which again, was my only point when I brought up Weinstein -- not to say the GOP is awesome, but to say Moral Outrage Inc. is hypocritical and dumb.
I think this is one of those times where people should hit the pause button on their political alignment.
Do that, and check out this interview. I was definitely on the neutrality bandwagon, and this sorta moved me into "wait, maybe I don't know what the hell I'm talking about" territory, where I am now.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
I guess that's at least thinking outside the box.
them gays are ALWAYS thinking 'outside the box.'
Just so everyone knows ahead of December.
So how's about that local sports team?
<Snipped quote by mdk>
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone about what happened at Warsaw. I just want quantifiable evidence about what happened, specifically from the immediately accessible person that claims to have been there and personally experienced the rallies.
That's kind of a weird tone to take with that person, if you're not taking sides.
Then again it's Andre.
<Snipped quote by mdk>
You do get that I'm not supporting the articles, right? I'm just asking Andreyich to provide the evidence for his claims. If he had just left it at, "Where's the proof that they're pro-genocide?", I would've been like, "Yeah, that's a good point." But, he said that he was actually there when the rallies took place. His personal experience could be evidence, but he hasn't proven that he was actually there to gather said evidence.
Here's where I jumped in:
<Snipped quote by Andreyich>
<Snipped quote by Andreyich>
Can you explain how, by being in Warsaw when these rallies took place, you know that the 60,000 people which were present espouse little to no views that call for genocide? If you spent just 1 second sampling each person's views, you'd have spent at least 16 hours sampling all 60,000 people. I'm rather skeptical that you accomplished such a feat, but if you have any quantifiable statistics to back up your assertion, I'd love to review them.
So like...... that's not what that looks like to me. The impression I got from that post wasn't "Oh, he's just saying that he wants evidence that Andre was there, and then he'll weigh everything appropriately." What I got from that post, and what prompted me to stick my nose where it don't belong, was "....well like you can't prove that NONE OF THEM were genocidal, with, like, stats or something, so like whatever dude."
Apologies if I'm misreading. It's starting to sound like you would have a similar complaint, if you perceived a post the way I perceived yours.
© 2007-2024