• Last Seen: 6 yrs ago
  • Old Guild Username: mbl
  • Joined: 11 yrs ago
  • Posts: 3648 (0.92 / day)
  • VMs: 0
  • Username history
    1. mdk 11 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

9 yrs ago
new leg today. I AM TERMINATOR REBORN
3 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

<Snipped quote by mdk>

Then why make that comparison? One got death threats for pissing on a flag, one got death threats for advocating a white ethnostate.


You posted a video of this random guy I've never heard of before, and the only thing I could remember six hours later at work was the part where he said "this everyone-that-isn't-me-is-hitler bullshit probably isn't healthy," then demanded to know why I hadn't compared him to this other random asshole who peed on things. I think there's a possibility you just spend more time with the assholes than I do. Anyway they're both perfectly within their rights. I don't know who these people are and I don't know why you're talking about them and I don't know what you want from me.


Misgendering a person in the state of California now carries a heavier prison sentence than stealing a gun and murdering a human being.
<Snipped quote by mdk>

Umm is that your interpretation for advocating for a white ethnostate?


No.
<Snipped quote by mdk>

any more 'lovely' than the guy in the video? Who wants an ethno state?

Both are teens by the way.


All's I know about either of these people is what's in your posts. Pissing on a flag seems significantly dumber than presenting an argument about the contributing factors to political violence. Your rights aren't contingent on you to be a non-dumbass though. What, uh.... What's going on here, what are we doing
<Snipped quote by mdk>

The girl who pissed on the american flag.


Well she sounds lovely.
EDIT:
I'm sure @mdk believes he shouldn't be getting death threats, as do I, but during the Emily Lance story, his free speech advocacy was surprisingly absent. Thoughts?


The what? Who?
Never posted in here before, but saw something on my Facebook feed that I thought would provoke some interesting - and entertaining - debate.
Thoughts?


Under no circumstances should participation in a lifestyle be compulsory.

....okay under only a very few circumstances should participation in a lifestyle be compulsory. There's such a thing as a "right time" for, like, the draft. This is not one of those special circumstances. And it's actually spelled out pretty clearly in the first amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


I've bolded the part which should pretty clearly rule out "you must do things you consider murder." Certainly the first portion applies as well -- congress shouldn't be banning abortions on religious or moral grounds either, but I digress. Compulsory homicide is the thing we're talking about. That.... doesn't sound like we even need to have a conversation about it, but I'll run it up the flagpole and see who salutes.
what y'all need is some

© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet