NarcolepticSailor

World in Revolution: 1861

Giant said
Well, couldn't hold myself back.

It's alright, neither could Chris Benoit.

World in Revolution: 1861

Outcast said
Made a decison - naval purchases are now based on industry level. Kho's purchase has been cut back (sorry Kho). Went over income stats and couldn't find any errors. Belgiums income has not been added to the Netherlands because that takes two updates - and before you get angry and say I should have said that, most parts of the stats are kept secret, and it was the same for all nations; Prussia, Sweden, Siam, all of them.Now will you all stop whinging?

Danke schon.

We will be informed when we should send in orders for a war mini, correct?

World in Revolution: 1861

Dedonus said
I mean, even if someone could "win", does that really mean anything? Does winning this actually mean that much? It sure doesn't for me. If I wanted to "win", I would play a "Total War" or "Age of" game.

It is more so the fact that things that shouldn't really be possibly are so. I don't expect everything to be realistic considering the same powers would reign supreme every time, but when certain things happen and the punishment is a one turn revolt, or a bunch of ships that shouldn't be possible or even if it is should probably cause some domestic issues... Though that doesn't seem to be happening which is why people aren't particularly pleased.

World in Revolution: 1861

Dedonus said
I second this. Just be the bigger man (that goes for everyone one).

Doesn't seem to ring true often enough. I mean, I'm not exactly pleased with the outcome myself nor do I fully understand the reasoning behind it and other actions in the past which went by with little punishment, but just kind of have to press on.

World in Revolution: 1861

Kho said
What's the matter guys? They're just a bunch of paper ships and club-weilding cavemen. No need to shit yourselves.Just keep teasing me, it inspires me to greater and greater levels of cold-blooded murderous intent ;)And just to put it out there, Outcast is doing a brilliant job, though I don't understand how such a puny nation like the Netherlands could raise such a force, even if they paid double. Just one of the countless mysteries of the world...

This is sure going to help matters.

World in Revolution: 1861

Out of curiosity, are we allowed to change orders even past the deadline?

World in Revolution: 1861

Pasta Sentient said
Sometimes it just comes down to the rolls as well. This is not supposed to be some hyper-realistic game. It's about the fun of all those involved and creating an enjoyable alternate history. Yeah, that means that sometimes 'realistic' details might not seem 100% logical, but does it really matter?

Outcast said 3) Keep things realistic. I understand that it is unlikely that we will be following the OTL to the letter, but that doesn't mean you can go and invent nuclear weapons in 1880 or release a tribe of smallpox-infested African Gorillas in downtown London.

Edit: Ottoman Empire making that many Ironclads that fast is kind of Gorillas in downtown. Even more so provided I don't believe they possess the capability to make them at the time, then again neither did Italy though I only have three coming. It does raise a question though as the Russian DoW on Persia while a bit silly without buildup was blocked, but certain moves made by Britain was responded to with barely an repercussions.

World in Revolution: 1861

Giant said
Cue everyone building the biggest navy ever seen.

Ikr? If I knew how much debt I could go into and be dandy I would be ruling the waves right now, rofl.

World in Revolution: 1861

Outcast said
@Nex; it didn't. Raising a bunch of troops reduced your income.

Out of curiosity, why did our incomes decrease from a small amount of soldiers but the Turks increased with much more soldiers and ships?

World in Revolution: 1861

AegonVI said
Is the update up yet? What have I missed?

No update yet, mang.