<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Perhaps, but knowledge of capabilities and actioned abuse are worlds apart.
We’ll see I guess. Like I said, I have some feelings.
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Perhaps, but knowledge of capabilities and actioned abuse are worlds apart.
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Perhaps this incident will be enough of a system shock to convince them otherwise.
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Sway over what individuals?
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
Perhaps something to think about and evaluate.
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Such as?
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
That being said, I don't approve of the approach. In my opinion, this weapon should be dismantled, or donated to research purposes.
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
My point. If you wish to live by a moral code, live by that moral code. If you wish to live by structure, join or create said structure. If you wish to reject all of this, you're free to do so, and you can adopt any contradiction, thought, or creed in its place. However, none of it will be assigned for you. No structure, by justice or otherwise, and no tenets, true or false. You must take those up yourself.
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
What happened to the others?
<Snipped quote by Audacious>
For all non-actionable items, in any case.
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Then what would we have done? Executed him for his crimes?
<Snipped quote by Revolutionary>
Even if we were, what would have been our option? Restrain him until we verified that nobody was hurt? And what if they were?