Avatar of rezay
  • Last Seen: 4 yrs ago
  • Joined: 4 yrs ago
  • Posts: 419 (0.30 / day)
  • VMs: 1
  • Username history
    1. rezay 4 yrs ago

Status

Recent Statuses

4 yrs ago
Reading books while driving is a good way to expand your knowledge
1 like
4 yrs ago
I hate the part of the world that uses "lollies" to refer to candies
2 likes
4 yrs ago
Imperials go home
2 likes
4 yrs ago
"What if you told a joke and somebody laughed?"
2 likes
4 yrs ago
I enjoy peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, but hold the peanut butter and jelly. Hate condiments on my sandwiches.
4 likes

Bio

User has no bio, yet

Most Recent Posts

*Retracted, idle speculation on an issue that doesn't exist yet
@DX3214That's also an important consideration— I think his are the only ones who do that as well. The advance of civilization would affect them quite differently
@DX3214I see what you mean. It really depends on how much people want to get invested into individual characters I suppose, I'll wait for the responses of the others on that. From @Klomster's IC post for example, he seems to be focusing on the story of Ata.

Perhaps we should come to a consensus of how many turns we give to a particular period in time/character.

I interpret the premise of this RP as a broader civilization-building thing, so it would be limiting to focus on one stage in the history of this island's civilization.
*Especially if we're focusing on the early days, where no one has much contact with other civilizations, or the civilizational... infrastructure, or backing, or whatever you want to call it, to make very impactful stories between species (situations like the skittermander and adamians excluded, the takhal particularly seem to be out of the way of everyone else).

@Dark CloudNah, all's good

Aside from that, @Dark Cloud @DX3214 @Crusader Lord @Klomster @Dog, since @6slyboy6 is being lax with the timescale, what's the opinion of you all? How fast should time advance for these first couple turns? Days? Years? Decades? Centuries? I assume the first turn will pick off where we were in our introduction— I keep forgetting that we've only gotten to post turn 0, as it were

I REQUIRE AN ANSWER
While you're here :)
No pressure
I didn't bother reading the speculation stuff since in my opinion we need to just type what we feel is right instead of continuously strategizing out loud.


Just teething stuff with the takhal, it seems like it's sorted out now.
Aside from that, @Dark Cloud @DX3214 @Crusader Lord @Klomster @Dog, since @6slyboy6 is being lax with the timescale, what's the opinion of you all? How fast should time advance for these first couple turns? Days? Years? Decades? Centuries? I assume the first turn will pick off where we were in our introduction— I keep forgetting that we've only gotten to post turn 0, as it were
@6slyboy6More likely I read over it and forgot :P scatterbrained I know

But, of course your say will be whichever way I decide. If you're fine with the new fauna, then I'll keep everything as-is. Otherwise is otherwise

I've also added the map to my CS.
@6slyboy6I was originally considering having no shelters, but on an open grassland like that the wind can pick up pretty hard, and there's zero natural cover from any bad weather (at least, the occasional tree isn't enough to shelter a whole tribe, maybe depending on how many takhal there are). Also I wasn't sure of the natural range of the herbivores in the bestiary, tbh I sort of glanced over it. It would also require them to hunt, which I wasn't sure was in their nature to do. Maybe scavenge, but that's unreliable. I suppose you could say slaughtering livestock isn't that different, but perhaps on a psychological level it is. I'll give the bestiary a better read

*On more reading, the Krollan seem like they'd be in contact with the takhal.
@KlomsterYes. I'm still awaiting ruling on population, but I doubt it would support anything like that. I'll clarify that they're large (not giant) for sheep, but small for the takhal. There are more anatomical differences for flavor, pending GM opinion I will probably add to sheet.

But, I'm not sure how else they'd make clothing, or their mobile shelters except by some livestock (which require leather at the least). *I don't think GM would begrudge me glorified teepees, that's certainly stone-age technology. On that note, an alternative is that they hunt some bison-like creature (Ovis), which I'd be fine with but since they aren't carnivores, I didn't imagine them as the hunting type.

*I've removed the wool aspect, on researching the timeline of wool use in human history they'd probably be a few centuries away at least from manufacturing any textiles from the aad's wool.

*Makes me wonder how much time will pass between turns, on average. If it's whole decades or centuries, this little story will probably be a simple snapshot of this time period. I am planning on having it directly precede a big schism in takhal society that creates multiple tribes for the first time. I suppose it is only the introduction. Eh, is that a spoiler? Oh well

*None of the pre-existing herbivores really fit the bill for what the takhal needed in the case they don't hunt. Interesting consideration: No hunting, no need for bows. Weapons are a given, there's bound to be some infighting occasionally. Good justification for balance, if needed. Still, you need to defend from predators, I imagine there are a lot of wolves on the steppe (/grassland). That would be justification in the other direction
Just posted first IC! Very excited.



I know that second link I included for the singing starts out hilariously, they're silly little Bojacks
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet