Beatrix said
Compared to Ken Ham... Bill Nye's presentation started off really weak.
As much as I love him, Bill's making a lot of assumptions about his audience's level of knowledge. I get what he's saying, but the ignorant won't.
Beatrix said
Compared to Ken Ham... Bill Nye's presentation started off really weak.
mdk said
to be fair it is Bill's turn now
Shy said
The Kangaroo argument. Beauty.
mdk said
If you assume that the creator of the universe supplied the blueprints then I think that'd trump shipwrights in Maryland but.... well that's not....
Shy said
14 So make yourself an ark of cypress[c] wood; make rooms in it and coat it with pitch inside and out. 15 This is how you are to build it: The ark is to be three hundred cubits long, fifty cubits wide and thirty cubits high.[d] 16 Make a roof for it, leaving below the roof an opening one cubit[e] high all around.[f] Put a door in the side of the ark and make lower, middle and upper decks (Genesis 5:14-15), He told them how big to make it but he didn't really give blueprints.
Captain Jordan said
That's why Creationists continue to perpetuate their one-sided view. The end-all argument is just "God did it" and that's the end.
Taaj said
bill nye talking about sexchildhoodwhere r u
mdk said
There's Bill 'The Hammer' Nye. BOOM. Lay it down.
mdk said
That's the premise, yes, and (as Ham has pointed out about a thousand times) they don't have a problem with moving on to go to actual science afterwards. As a premise it's not much more ridiculous than 'God didn't do it and that's the end.'
Captain Jordan said
Personally, I don't see why religion and science have to be diametrically opposed.