1. Home
  2. Casual Roleplay

[OOC] Yu-Gi-Oh! Ω [OMEGA] Page 2

Join Status: Full
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rethel34
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rethel34

Rethel34 Inverted Archery

Member Seen 5 mos ago
That's . . . actually, a good, solid, well-rounded card.

EDIT: Someone thinks they're cool. TSFH's Archangel for a theme.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Scarifar
Raw —
Avatar of Scarifar

Scarifar Presto~!

Member Seen 4 days ago
So... This is a card I made a while ago, not sure how balanced I can say it is, so I'm asking you guys to help me judge this.

Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by UnendingEmpire
Raw —
Avatar of UnendingEmpire

UnendingEmpire bye~

Member Seen 7 yrs ago
1Charak2 said The effect is not op It only happens once XD

YCM style review [+]

EDIT:
Rethel34 said That's . . . actually, a good, solid, well-rounded card.

Please don't take this as me arguing, but I want your dealer's number.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rethel34
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rethel34

Rethel34 Inverted Archery

Member Seen 5 mos ago
XD I've actually read that before XD

Of course, Raigeki is no longer banned. :(

My only question is if its effect only activates once, then why not remove all three Materials?

And I don't see the effect as overpowered because it's Lightning Vortex in an Xyz Material. Or you can get a temp 2000 boost. Simple answer to that problem: Draining Shield, then nuke it next turn.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MightyGos
Raw —

MightyGos

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
1Charak2 said
The effect is not op It only happens once XD


I'm okay with the effect but the attack is unusually high for a rank 4 xyz, it is in fact, the highest I've ever seen for a rank 4. If you're going to have such a badass effect you should nerf down the attack to 2000.

EDIT: Just noticed the second effect destroys ALL attack position monsters. No thank you, make that a one.

Scarifar said
So... This is a card I made a while ago, not sure how balanced I can say it is, so I'm asking you guys to help me judge this.


Do you really need this? I mean, you already have a big influx of high level monsters by the look of your deck.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rethel34
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rethel34

Rethel34 Inverted Archery

Member Seen 5 mos ago
Rank 4 Xyz Monster that requires 3 Xyz Materials. . . .
I've seen a Rank 4 that requires 2 non-specific materials that has 2500 ATK. It's called Utopia.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MightyGos
Raw —

MightyGos

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
Oh, its been a long time since i last checked what new cards were out. Cross my previous statement out.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by UnendingEmpire
Raw —
Avatar of UnendingEmpire

UnendingEmpire bye~

Member Seen 7 yrs ago
Rethel34 said Rank 4 Xyz Monster that requires 3 Xyz Materials. . . .I've seen a Rank 4 that requires 2 non-specific materials that has 2500 ATK. It's called Utopia.

Yeah, but Utopia has no nuking or ATK-gaining abilities on his own. He's just right there at 2500 - not a hard number to meet or exceed by any means in today's game - and is easily disposed of. But against 4500 ATK points staring you in the face...you pretty much need to destroy it by card effect. I for one think Charak should put it up on YCM's forums for better, more seasoned opinions on how to balance it out, but for now, imma just go back to working on my character.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rethel34
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rethel34

Rethel34 Inverted Archery

Member Seen 5 mos ago
Alright, so, to show what is common among Rank 4 Xyz Monsters . . .
Rank 4 Xyz Monsters with 2500 + ATK [+]

Now, maybe not all of those are amazing, but a number of those not only have good points, but also have REALLY good effects. And how many are at all touching the Limited list? Not a one. I MIGHT hit this thing with a Semi. (As in, Semi-Limit it . . . not run it over with a tractor trailer) Maybe. No guarantees.

4500 is until the end phase. Compare against Night Papilloperative. Or Dark Rebellion Xyz Dragon. I see Charak's monster as on-par.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MightyGos
Raw —

MightyGos

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
Welp, what the hell do I know about yugioh, right?
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by malmshodes
Raw —
Avatar of malmshodes

malmshodes

Member Seen 1 yr ago
Sweet! I'm glad to see this is up again. I'll start working on my cards ASAP. :D
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rethel34
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rethel34

Rethel34 Inverted Archery

Member Seen 5 mos ago
Hi, mr. malm
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by UnendingEmpire
Raw —
Avatar of UnendingEmpire

UnendingEmpire bye~

Member Seen 7 yrs ago
Rethel34 said 4500 is until the end phase.

...oh. I still think there should be a "Your opponent takes no further damage this turn" claus on that nuking effect at the least. Especially given it's otherwise just Exciton on steroids.
MightyGos said Welp, what the hell do I know about yugioh, right?

It's cuz your posts always end up between other posts
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by malmshodes
Raw —
Avatar of malmshodes

malmshodes

Member Seen 1 yr ago
Sweet! I'm glad to see this is up again. I'll start working on my cards ASAP. :D
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rethel34
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rethel34

Rethel34 Inverted Archery

Member Seen 5 mos ago
Sorry, Gos.

@Empire: Fair enough, I suppose. I'll leave it to Charak to see if he agrees.

@ Scar: Sorry for ignoring. Charak's card blew everything up. Uhm . . . maybe a tad OP'd, but then again, maybe not. I'll see what everyone else thinks.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The Irish Tree
Raw —
Avatar of The Irish Tree

The Irish Tree Hot-Blooded Loser

Member Seen 18 hrs ago
Scarifar said
It uses current atk/def. He even says so in the first post.



...I don't even know how I missed that...reread it before I asked...
I am but a tree, with a love of card games and the inability to read.
UnendingEmpire said
I immediately say we should let Irish Tree in. Anyone with that sig is frickin' awesome in my book.


*is now thankful for pushing out the thought of changing his signature Danke.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The Red Seelie
Raw —
Avatar of The Red Seelie

The Red Seelie Eliminate the Impossible / What remains is Truth

Member Seen 1 mo ago
well i will bump it up to all 3 materials. as cost and on the buff no other monsters you control can attack this turn if you guys believe that will fairer it.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by MightyGos
Raw —

MightyGos

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
Incidentally, I won't post my CS until sunday, some stuff going on today and tomorrow but I should be operational again after that (?)
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rethel34
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rethel34

Rethel34 Inverted Archery

Member Seen 5 mos ago
@Tree: Nah, you're good. I don't mind giving an extra demonstration. Sometimes it helps peoples. :)
@Char: How about 500 for each material if all three? Then you have a 4000 monster. Then you say it can't attack your opponent directly this turn and be done?
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The Red Seelie
Raw —
Avatar of The Red Seelie

The Red Seelie Eliminate the Impossible / What remains is Truth

Member Seen 1 mo ago
Rethel34 said
@Tree: Nah, you're good. I don't mind giving an extra demonstration. Sometimes it helps peoples. :)@Char: How about 500 for each material if all three? Then you have a 4000 monster. Then you say it can't attack your opponent directly this turn and be done?


any battle damage taken from this card is halved?
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet