@gammaflux@akje No snacks!

@TheWizardLizard It might be a trap

Does anyone know of anybody that would like to join us since I'm still going to have one spot open. I would prefer if it was someone that was trusted instead of someone off the streets that would join and then get lost because the weren't here the whole time and leave

Speaking of Carver, anyone else find it ironic he has a diplomat skill, but is unable to lie?

Speaking of Carver, anyone else find it ironic he has a diplomat skill, but is unable to lie?

I'm just surprised that someone was able to jump over Carver without invoking an attack of opportunity

<Snipped quote by Dragonbud>

Well in this case, in DnD terms, it was by all technicalities Carver's turn and he chose to use charge, while charging if you enter any adjacent enemy squares then you provoke an attack of opportunity. So basically Carver was to busy with his face in the shield charging to stop and swing upwards.

<Snipped quote by Dragonbud>

Well in this case, in DnD terms, it was by all technicalities Carver's turn and he chose to use charge, while charging if you enter any adjacent enemy squares then you provoke an attack of opportunity. So basically Carver was to busy with his face in the shield charging to stop and swing upwards.

<Snipped quote by Kronshi>

In DnD terms, charging into threatened area doesn't provoke AoO.
Charging trough or out of threatened area does. So Furnace would have been able to take a AoO against Carver, but he's not hostile so the option is usually skipped. Now what the bandit did:
As a move action (at half movement speed) you can move trough threatened space. Moving trough a hostile characters space ads 5 to the roll.
If you fail you still move but provoke.

So what the bandit did was legit, he'd just have to make two tough acrobatics rolls. (one to make the jump, one against Carver's maneuver defence + 5). If he'd failed the first he'd fallen on his face, if he'd failed the second he'd gotten a stab up de hurtybits.

<Snipped quote by akje>

Yes, but most DnD rules are up to the DM's discretion, it's how I run things and, according to DnD, adjusting the rules to fit your play style is legitimate. So how I did things was just as legit, but either way you make a good point and I did do an acrobatics check for both but considered the fact that he was able to even make a check to be because of AoO

Alternatively, my idea is to ruin the whole duel and defeat the swordsman by killing his friends via ambush. Who's up for that? Eh? Eh?

Carver is forever guilty by association and will never be able to clean his hands of this. He must his renounce his role as a paladin.