@MetalLover
Could you review my expanded military section?

There seems to be some misconception about religion in the Caliphate so I am going to clarify things a bit^^

The Caliphate is a radical sunni Islamic state. There is no freedom of religion. The only option is to be sunni and if you don't want to you will feel the wrath of allah :)

Any other forms of religion are prohibited by law and their institutions dissolved between 2020 and 2035. There is no christian ortodox church, there are no catholic churches, no Jewish temples, no shia mosques. Also there are no religious minorities. They have all been persecuted, murdered, forced to leave the Caliphate or converted to Islam. Only a handful (less then two million) of non-sunni people remain in the Caliphate as slaves.

This policy of expelling all the other religions from the country has led to an unprecedent period of stability and prosperity within the Caliphate's borders. Sectarian violence has been eradicated by removing the competition. Women can go to the markets without having to fear getting blown up by suicide bombers. All the instability you see in present day Syria and Iraq has been gone. Everybody lives happily ever after under the sharia law, unless you're gay or commited adultry. Then you get stoned to death ;)

Here's my final app. I made a major change to the military section. I don't think it's too strong, but you might have another opinion.

Unified Territories of America [+]

Legal Nation Name:

Unified Territories of America

What Areas Do You Control:

California, Utah, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Montana, Wyoming, the Baja Peninsula, and Colorado

Flag or Banner:

Political Party:

The American Restoration Committee currently holds power in the UTA, and is led by Commander In Chief Richard MacEoin.

Type of Government:

Military Dictatorship.

Military:

The UTA military is, of course, controlled by Norton. Each of the four branches (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines) is led by an appointed "Branch Chief". The Branch Chiefs are as follows:

Army: Christopher Huerta
Navy: Richard Ančjo
Air Force: Yuuki Sora
Marine Corps: Yeong Suk

The total active combat personnel number for the UTA Armed Forces is approx. 862 thousand. Most of these personnel are in either the Army or the Marines, with the Air Force at a close second and the Navy coming in last. The Marine Corps is the smallest due to UTA policy, which kept it out of overseas wars for the entirety of the first Commander In Chief's reign. In fact, there has been talk of simply merging the Army and Marine Corps into a single branch as the two are more or less treated as one entity already.

The Army and Marine Corps make extensive use of "Soft Exosuits", which are a derivative of the cutting-edge power armors that are beginning to make their way into the world's armies. Unlike such power armor, Soft Exosuits offer no extra protection. They do, however, greatly increase the carrying capacity and mobility of soldiers. These exosuits are nowhere near as rare as powered armor, and are standard issue in the UTA. Powered Armor is being developed, and prototypes are in field testing already. Even so, some in the military hierarchy believe that the focus should be on improving the soft exosuits instead of introducing powered armor.

Ground vehicle design hasn't changed much since before WWIII, though new technology has been implemented. Artillery designs utilize railguns, which allow the shells to have a higher explosive capacity and an adjustable velocity. These railguns have nowhere near the destructive power of naval ones, however, and have much smaller ranges. Tanks still utilize traditional weaponry, however, as the power requirements for railguns have yet to be reduced to such a range.

All UTA ground vehicles utilize a system to limit collateral damage from shockwaves, which utilizes a sensor capable of detecting a shockwave-generating explosion and an arc generator that receives the signal from the sensor to ionise a small region, producing a plasma field between the target and the explosion using lasers, electricity and microwaves. Main battle tanks use an upgraded system which is capable of deflecting projectiles, but it's chances of successfully deflecting a shot have been described as the same as one's chances of rolling snake eyes.

The Navy of the UTA is disproportionately large to its military doctrine, having inherited the old USA Pacific Fleet and it's five aircraft carriers. Alongside these behemoths are 10 Cruisers, 25 Destroyers, and 15 Littoral III Combat Ships. Naval weaponry is where the technology of the late USA truly shows its potential. Lasers are widely deployed, as are high-power railguns. All ships use defensive systems similar to those used on main battle tanks, but obviously quite a bit more powerful. Of course, they're still just as much of a gamble. As the plans of the new dictator go forward, new ships are being design for larger-scale combat with foreign navies.

Last but not least is the Air Force, which works extremely closely with the Army. It extensively utilizes drone technology, though for the most part only in ground attack aircraft. Fighters tend to be manned for quicker response time, as well as the prevailing belief that pilots will fight better if their lives are actually in danger. Thanks to their extensive aerospace complex, the Air Force has some of the best planes on the continent, not to mention their high numbers considering the size of the nation. The UTAF also controls the nuclear weapons formerly stationed by the USA in UTA territory. This has never been officially disclosed, and no weapons have ever been tested due to fear of igniting a war. However, their possession of such weapons could easily be inferred due to the fact that they are a successor state of one of the recognized nuclear powers of the pre-WWIII world.

Productions:

Aerospace products, information technology, natural gas, and high-tech military products.

History of the Nation (Easy Pz):

Though the UTA was not born until nearly halfway through the Third World War, the events that led up to its creation begin much further back. It was first conceived in 2018 as the end result of a long series of schemes and plans. The original goal of this overarching "master plan" was to unite the USA under a highly centralized government in order to prevent its collapse. To keep the nation stable, it would be turned into a dictatorship to be governed by only the best and the brightest. The idea was that the people were incapable of governing themselves, and that monarchy was worthless since heirs were chosen according to blood and not ability. Thus, a dictatorship where leaders are appointed by the former was the only realistic option.

These plans were set in motion by a select few, chosen by the man now remembered as the first dictator of the UTA. Through politics and business, they gained power. They drummed up support in the public and military alike, slowly but surely preparing for the coup. Whether or not this would have actually worked is up for debate, but after the collapse of the USA in the middle of WWIII, it didn't even matter. All that mattered was that the country was in chaos, and the movement had support, money, and power.

Like so many other military dictatorships, the UTA rose because the people believed they had no other choice. They could either choose to stand with the remnants of the once-great Union, or join one of its many successor states. Given the choices the states that had not been claimed by one of the successors had, many of them chose the UTA. It was founded mere months after the collapse in California, the largest of the independent states. Promising all who would join it safety, order, and justice, it incorporated the states that now make it up.

Work began on turning the UTA into a stronger nation, companies were nationalized to ensure that all resources were focused on building up the fledgling nation. Among these were multiple aerospace firms, including spaceflight companies such as Virgin Galactic and SpaceX. Sensible acquisitions for the government, after all, they provided them with production facilities that could easily be retooled for military production (if they weren't already). However, the UTA's military government wasn't satisfied. They wanted to set themselves up to have one of the best Air Forces in the new, turbulent region of North America.

So they went to war.

The newly-formed Mexican Empire, a fascist nation that had arisen from the ashes of the ill-fated democracy, controlled the Baja Peninsula. Despite it's reputation for having Tijuana in it and nothing else, the peninsula's northern state was home to multiple aerospace corporations. The UTA knew that in the hands of the militaristic fascist government, they would all be dedicated to producing military aircraft. Fearful of the power Imperial Mexico would hold and thirsty for more power of their own, the UTA immediately drew up invasion plans.

The UTA got lucky in the short-lived Second Mexican-American war (as it is known in the UTA). The Empire was focused on expanding their borders south in the chaos of the Third World War, believing that after the collapse of the USA nobody would care to stop or attack them. With their armies tied up, the UTA unexpectedly launched a blitzkrieg into the Baja Peninsula. They stormed in from the North with the full force of their military, hoping that the other successor states of America wouldn't take advantage of them as they had done to Mexico. They fortified the small northern land border heavily, continuing to push South with little resistance. To prevent Mexican reinforcements from arriving, they moved their fleet in-between the peninsula and the rest of Mexico, effectively blockading them.

After that, they allowed the war to fall into a stalemate. They let the Mexican Empire try to retake the peninsula, pushing them back each and time. They didn't want to win the war by pushing in further and turning it into an offensive war. Instead, they kept it defensive, trying to break the will of the Empire. In the end, it worked. Mexico surrendered the Baja Peninsula, and the UTA immediately made it quite clear to the inhabitants of the northern half that they were now their citizens. Revolts were brutally put down, but protests were not. Instead, the UTA simply forced demonstrations to be put through registration and guarded. They made themselves look like benevolent rulers, and slowly but surely the independence movements began to die down.

The southern half, however, was a different story. The UTA attempted to hold onto it, but the majority of their occupation forces were sent to the North. After all, they were barely concerned with the South. Revolts were successful in multiple cities, requiring direct military offensives to retake them. Instead of redirecting forces from the North or the original territories, the government placated the South by giving them significant autonomy, turning them into a "Special Administrative Zone" where they kept the laws of Mexico while flying the UTA flag alongside the flag of the original state of Baja California Sur. Of course, they also stationed an aircraft carrier in Tijuana and made it quite clear that separatist movements would not be tolerated.

Immediately after this, the UTA swung straight into the production of military equipment. They sold to the Allies of WWIII, which found themselves in great need of new equipment. The UTA's designs, which were some of the most advanced of the time thanks to the advancements made in the old USA being incorporated into different vehicles, were a great boon to the Allies. Demand for the UTA-produced products grew as the war inched towards its climax. Nobody cared that they were buying from a dictatorship that conquered a chunk of Mexico, they only cared that they were getting American rifles, American tanks, and American railguns and lasers to use on their Navy.

The UTA's industrial capability grew and grew, with the government-owned factories being intentionally built to be easily modified. They had no illusions that the war would last forever, and wanted to be ready for any political or economic climate afterwards. When the war came to a close, the UTA innovated. They began to build advanced artillery, better tanks, networked battlefield information systems linked right into holographic heads-up-displays in soldier's helmets. They wanted the most advanced military on the continent, and they had the capability to get it.

Now, the UTA has found itself with advanced military technology, the men and women to operate it, and a massive Empire that would prefer it if the UTA just ceased to exist. In fear of Mexico, they continue to expand their military. Though their current dictator, Richard MacEoin, may very well have plans for it beyond countering a hypothetical Mexican offensive.

Main Race:

68% of European descent, 10% of African descent, 20% of Asian descent, 2% Other (Native North/South American, Pacific Islander, Alaskan Native, etc).

Main Religion:

The UTA is mostly Christian, which is split into Protestant and Catholic sections far more equally than it's neighbor nations due to its large population of Hispanics/Latinos. Atheism and Agnosticism are also more popular than in neighboring countries, and the secular Government pushes a policy of religious tolerance.
Other:

<Snipped quote by Durandal>Coilguns are generally a bad idea if you need something powerful yet compact. If you want something strong you have to start from the size of a truck.
I mean a coilgun with a size of a truck, not a coilgun mounted on trucks.
Railguns are preferable in general.
If anything I'd replace the 7 giant gun emplacements with coilguns. They are less needy in maintenance which may help to keep the big guns more affordable.
If you don't like that name, call them Gauss Guns/Cannons. This and coilguns are practically interchangeable in meaning.

Also if you can have a coilgun/railgun that can threaten tanks then so could you build a conventional gun with it.
And if it can threaten tanks with a gun, then obviously that's a tank gun in size. Meaning it would be anything but man-portable.
Like I said before railguns and such are no OP wonderweapons. They are just a different mechanism.

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

So basically switch the two for their current positions?

<Snipped quote by Durandal>More or less.
And try to stick with ATGMs for infantry-use anti-tank methods.
Or at best try to use coilguns to launch anti-tank warheads.

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

It is a fairly large gun, when I said two people operate it I meant that's the only thing they carry. But yes, they use anti-tank warheads. Faster than missiles.

<Snipped quote by Durandal>Problem with electronic weapons that they are even more cumbersome than conventional weapons.
Unless you go under certain limits.
Granted, you probably don't need the gun for more than a few shots so perhaps putting together several or dozens of regular "railgun rifle batteries" is enough to power the system.
The barrel would still require to be crazy-long and overall we talk about tons of weight here to make an "anti-tank railgun".
Then there's the much-obvious issue with the recoil. You'd need a large and rather stable platform for any level of safety and reliability during fire.
If you want an actual anti-tank railgun you need a tank, a comparable vehicle or something like a towed field artillery.
That's why I didn't recommend this to you.

Having something more similar to an altered coilgun mortar could be more viable.
Basically think of a coilgun but it launches a warhead at higher velocities. Somewhere around the supersonic range, for example.
This of course renders your system into an actual cannon with the recoil to deal with which explains why the weapon is heavy and needs two men to operate.
Personally I'd still prefer missiles for their softer launch and guided nature but it's really just a matter of opinion.

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

Wouldn't said coil gun mortar still need to be quite large? And the purpose of the rail gun isn't to defeat tanks but light armored vehicles. The cumbersome nature is also a reason why it rarely sees use outside of defensive positions due to the time required to set up the gun.

<Snipped quote by Durandal>Well, it needs an energy source (which would likely look like a car battery in size/weight), the launch tube/system (kinda the same weight as a larger ATGM nowadays), some kind of pod to provide stability and of course the warheads.
It'd be a two-man system alright but it won't be particularly that bad in regards of weight.
Like I said it'd be like a somewhat heavier mortar system.
Actually, there are plans to make mortars launch their projectiles via coilgun mechanisms.
Each of your projectiles would only have half the weight compared to missiles with similar role, so about 10-15kg a piece.
The weight of the Mortar could be reduced by CNT or other carbon-polymers, although I think it might be counterproductive at one point due to the recoil.
So perhaps 50-100kg for the weapon system alone.
Let's surmize.
10-15 kg per warhead, let's say they carry 3-4.
15kg for the battery
60 kg for the weapon itself.
Unless the two are already encumbered this set-up is viable for a two man team.

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

But would a man-portable railgun system carried by two men with exoskeletons be viable against light vehicles? Without too much armor, a round fired from this should be able to punch through thin metal and maybe medium armored vehicles. But this coil mortar sounds interesting in concept. Perhaps I'll use that instead.

<Snipped quote by Durandal>Hm, it'd be sorts of an engineering marvel.
I mean it'd be seriously edged out to match tank railguns at armor-defeating role in spite of being smaller and operated by a much lighter unit.
It'd also question why don't everyone starts adopting such system if it actually works against tanks.
But let's get back to the technicalities.
Because the barrel is 4 times shorter with the same acceleration the gun can only achieve half the velocity compared to tank railguns.
Or to be exact, this is the force of the railgun. You can compensate by using lighter load and lighter rails.
Reducing weight to 1/4th can balance out the speed/length scale here.
You can then compensate the loss in weight by reducing the cross-section of the impact.
Half the diameter, quadruple the theoretical penetration.
Defeating armor is kind of a complex thing though so you can't just safely say this. Actually since the impact energy is halved the tank may absorb the impact still while the heavier slug will penetrate better.

Okay, I won't bore you further with the details.
Point is, it's possible but the chance of scoring a kill will be a gamble even with all these mods.
Overcharging will be inevitable to give the weapon just a faint more edge.
Also the recoil will require bracing/stabilizing to the ground to be properly handled.
I say you would better focus on anti-tank warheads to kill tanks. Meanwhile your railgun can be used against hard targets and bunkers that aren't as well-rounded in protection as contemporary tanks.

I lost interest in this, I will allow anyone to take my claims now.

<Snipped quote by Vanguardian>

Mhm, hey @Keyguyperson, feel like a friendly conflict over some southwestern territories?