Inequality can't exist.

Humans are inherently unequal.

Only yields comparatively fruitful results in Western European (see: non-clannish) societies.

I don't see the Middle East or Africa suddenly accepting that homosexuality is normal, that transgender people deserve a safe space in the contemporary world , and that women need to be unshackled from the potent, malevolent grip of patriarchy.

If you want them to embrace your egalitarian philosophy and its keystone principles, you're going to have to radically genetically engineer them to be something that they are clearly not.

-Snip-

<Snipped quote by ASTA>

<Snipped quote by ASTA>
Kek

Inequality as in humans being different from one another =! Inequality perpetuated by the state and capitalist ideology designed to create economic disparity

<Snipped quote by ASTA>
Except it is happening? Just last week a Saudi prince promised to donate $32 billion in order to "help build bridges to foster cultural understanding, develop communities, empower women, enable youth, provide vital disaster relief and create a more tolerant and accepting world." Women can vote in Saudi Arabia this year. Lebanon legalized homosexual acts just last year, and although I'm not the biggest fan of Israel, they are one of the most progressive countries in the world when it comes to women and LGBT rights.

A Transgender celebrity in Angola has been in the international spotlight for years, and is one of the best selling artists in the country. Mozambique just decriminalised homosexuality on June 1st. In fact, as far as Africa goes, it's actually the remaining colonial Christian influence that's left so many nations with the cultural attitudes they have today (obviously that's a vast generalization, but the influence still remains) pre-scramble for Africa, women were pretty much on par with men in most areas, sexual fluidity and homosexuality between men and women was open in places like Lesotho and the Congo-- Hatshepsut may have literally identified as a man. But that was like a million years ago-- back to the point--

Does that mean it's over? No. In a lot of these places, it's worse for women, LGBTQ individuals, and other minority groups than most Westerners can even imagine. But that doesn't mean that things aren't slowly getting better.

These threads always restore my faith in humanity. Because nobody ever agrees with The Patriarch.

Not like it will matter if the feminists or MRAs get there way once the robots take over. Since we will than be all equal under the all seeing digital god who watches your every move and reads your every action.

<Snipped quote by Nilesapa>

It's better than eating menstrual blood pancakes for breakfast in a feminist ruled society.

Surely blood doesn't retain that color when cooked? That looks like food dye.

<Snipped quote by ASTA>

Damn dude, like, did your school have any books printed after 1900? All of this pseudo-darwinism was thrown out before your Great-Grandma was born. Like, the 300 years or so that western society developed liberalism isn't enough time for us to somehow become genetically liberal. This isn't genetics, its cultural patterns, and those are too fluid to be explained by genetics.

This isn't genetics, its cultural patterns, and those are too fluid to be explained by genetics.

<Snipped quote by ASTA>

So I could kill off everyone who opposes homosexuality, which would eventually wipe out the "homos ewwwwwww" gene, and that would be morally acceptable because I'm a more fit creature, which I've demonstrated by murdering millions?

What if I killed everyone but five hundred people whom I like for arbitrary reasons. Are those five hundred superior beings to everyone who died because they're still alive? What if they're all obese, drooling idiots? Are they still superior?

<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>

You know, you could've just skipped to the point and evoked Godwin's Law by comparing me to Hitler.

The cultural makeup of various human civilizations and societies are, in many ways, diametric manifestations of their native population's collective psychological profile. The overt cultural and administrative texture of Japan, for example, differs from that of Jordan's because the Yamato people are measurably dissimilar to Arabs when it comes to a distinctive assortment of psychological attributes. Both are subsets of the encompassing human species, but they've evolved in different geographical locales over the course of several thousand years.

Culture influences genetics; genetics influences culture.

<Snipped quote by Vilageidiotx>

Well duh, it's pretty obvious that it isn't real. What I want to know is whether or not you could actually make a pancake using blood in general.

Feminism is still incredibly illogical at times and uses science as only a way to prove their viewpoints. They're no different than any other extreme group, anyone who doesn't agree with you is your enemy and must be converted or silenced.

Feminism is still incredibly illogical at times and uses science as only a way to prove their viewpoints. They're no different than any other extreme group, anyone who doesn't agree with you is your enemy and must be converted or silenced.